Anyone have the video of Roy getting attacked?

[Amused]

Originally posted by: Aharami
tigers are wild by nature and should not have been introduced to civilization.

So were house cats, dogs, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc...

Or do you think "god" created those animals already domesticated?

 

[Anubis]

Originally posted by: Viper GTS

Originally posted by: Anubis

Originally posted by: UlricT
its ain't roy rogers!!! Its roy horn... and you guys havent been watching CNN???

i havent watched CNN in years. whats you point??

i dont watch TV i get my News from ATOT, i figue if its important someone will post about it

It's been all over the news sites, don't you read ANY news?

Viper GTS

no

 

[Aharami]

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Aharami
tigers are wild by nature and should not have been introduced to civilization.

So were house cats, dogs, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc...

Or do you think "god" created those animals already domesticated?

but they have been domesticated through selective breeding. and small dogs and cats arent wild by nature. tigers were never domesticated over many generations. so yes, they are still wild. and animals evolve

 

[hdeck]

Originally posted by: Anubis

Originally posted by: UlricT
its ain't roy rogers!!! Its roy horn... and you guys havent been watching CNN???

i havent watched CNN in years. whats you point??

i dont watch TV i get my News from ATOT, i figue if its important someone will post about it

...it was posted on ATOT a few days ago. you must have missed it.

 

[AbsolutDealage]

Getting back to the topic here... who has the video?

 

[Amused]

Originally posted by: Aharami

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Aharami
tigers are wild by nature and should not have been introduced to civilization.

So were house cats, dogs, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc...

Or do you think "god" created those animals already domesticated?

but they have been domesticated through selective breeding. and small dogs and cats arent wild by nature. tigers were never domesticated over many generations. so yes, they are still wild. and animals evolve

But at one time, ALL were wild, right? (of course) So some human had to first start breeding and domesticating them, right? Tell me, when was the cut-off point for that? When did it become wrong to do what has been done for millennia?

BTW, at one time, small cats and dogs were as wild as any other animal.

 

[Ynog]

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Aharami
tigers are wild by nature and should not have been introduced to civilization.

So were house cats, dogs, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc...

Or do you think "god" created those animals already domesticated?

Obviously not, however most of these animals have been domesticated
over a long period of time. Yet you still see dogs attacking people and
their owners. Tigers aren't domesticated. Even if you bottle feed one
its still has its own instincts. Those instincts are alittle more dangerous
than the instincts of a cat or a dog.

Another good idea when it comes to pets. Don't get a pet that looks at you
and at anytime might think food.

 

[adlep]

So were house cats, dogs, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc...

Or do you think "god" created those animals already domesticated?

I hpe you are kidding....
Tigers ARE NOT pets. There is no way you will be able to "domesticate" a tiger....
Heck, even your small, qute kitty can be plain MEAN at times, so can you imagine a tiger?

 

[xdraenor]

i say put em both in a cage and lets go for round 2. just like in nature. the toughest survive

 

[Amused]

Originally posted by: adlep

So were house cats, dogs, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc...

Or do you think "god" created those animals already domesticated?

I hpe you are kidding....
Tigers ARE NOT pets. There is no way you will be able to "domesticate" a tiger....
Heck, even your small, qute kitty can be plain MEAN at times, so can you imagine a tiger?

No, I'm not kidding. Many domesticated animals can kill. That doesn't make them any less usefull.

How many bulls have you pet?

 

[Aharami]

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Aharami

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Aharami
tigers are wild by nature and should not have been introduced to civilization.

So were house cats, dogs, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc...

Or do you think "god" created those animals already domesticated?

but they have been domesticated through selective breeding. and small dogs and cats arent wild by nature. tigers were never domesticated over many generations. so yes, they are still wild. and animals evolve

But at one time, ALL were wild, right? (of course) So some human had to first start breeding and domesticating them, right? Tell me, when was the cut-off point for that? When did it become wrong to do what has been done for millennia?

BTW, at one time, small cats and dogs were as wild as any other animal.

yea sure. cats and dogs were wild many years back. and im sure they mauled some people too when they were being domesticated. and im sure those cats and dogs who attacked humans were put down. but the fact is, killing those animals for their "bad behavior" didnt have any effect on the population since they werent endangered. but the white tiger is endangered. killing that one tiger will have an impact on the tiger populaiton today. thats why i said to not kill the animal but just keep it in a zoo where it can breed or something

 

[Amused]

Originally posted by: Aharami

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Aharami

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Aharami
tigers are wild by nature and should not have been introduced to civilization.

So were house cats, dogs, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc...

Or do you think "god" created those animals already domesticated?

but they have been domesticated through selective breeding. and small dogs and cats arent wild by nature. tigers were never domesticated over many generations. so yes, they are still wild. and animals evolve

But at one time, ALL were wild, right? (of course) So some human had to first start breeding and domesticating them, right? Tell me, when was the cut-off point for that? When did it become wrong to do what has been done for millennia?

BTW, at one time, small cats and dogs were as wild as any other animal.

yea sure. cats and dogs were wild many years back. and im sure they mauled some people too when they were being domesticated. and im sure those cats and dogs who attacked humans were put down. but the fact is, killing those animals for their "bad behavior" didnt have any effect on the population since they werent endangered. but the white tiger is endangered. killing that one tiger will have an impact on the tiger populaiton today. thats why i said to not kill the animal but just keep it in a zoo where it can breed or something

I musta jumped in the middle, because I don't believe he should be put down either. Hell, I think bulls who win bull fights should be rewarded with a lifetime of grain and sex.

My point was that ANY animal can be domesticated, given enough time and effort.

 

[Aharami]

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: adlep

So were house cats, dogs, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc...

Or do you think "god" created those animals already domesticated?

I hpe you are kidding....
Tigers ARE NOT pets. There is no way you will be able to "domesticate" a tiger....
Heck, even your small, qute kitty can be plain MEAN at times, so can you imagine a tiger?

No, I'm not kidding. Many domesticated animals can kill. That doesn't make them any less usefull.

How many bulls have you pet?

since you are using usefulness of an animal in your arguement, what is the usefulness of a show tiger besides pure entertainment. and im sorry, but that one type of entertainment is not necessary for the survival of humans.
Bulls? yes they are useful.... tigers....not useful to humans. so why not leave the tigers in their natural habitats?

 

[Amused]

Originally posted by: Aharami

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: adlep

So were house cats, dogs, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc...

Or do you think "god" created those animals already domesticated?

I hpe you are kidding....
Tigers ARE NOT pets. There is no way you will be able to "domesticate" a tiger....
Heck, even your small, qute kitty can be plain MEAN at times, so can you imagine a tiger?

No, I'm not kidding. Many domesticated animals can kill. That doesn't make them any less usefull.

How many bulls have you pet?

since you are using usefulness of an animal in your arguement, what is the usefulness of a show tiger besides pure entertainment. and im sorry, but that one type of entertainment is not necessary for the survival of humans.
Bulls? yes they are useful.... tigers....not useful to humans. so why not leave the tigers in their natural habitats?

Neither is beef or cow milk. These are luxuries. Entertainment IS useful, and profitable.

BTW, Don't you think that zoos and shows do more to raise awareness of these animals, thus helping to ensure their survival? Taking a few out of the wild and breeding them in captivity will not change what is happening to cause their extinction.

 

[Lucky]

Originally posted by: brigden

The tiger is in quarantine in accordance with state law, Feldman said, and a decision on what to do with the animal won't be made until more is known about Horn's condition.

WTH does that mean? If he dies, they'll put the tiger down, but if he pulls through they'll spare its life?

it means that
roy requested the tiger not be killed.. if roy dies i imagine that request would not matter and he'd be put down.

 

[dabuddha]

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Aharami
tigers are wild by nature and should not have been introduced to civilization.

So were house cats, dogs, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc...

Or do you think "god" created those animals already domesticated?

There's a tad bit difference between a tiger and cats/dogs/cows/sheep/pigs/chickens/etc.

You're a smart man, think about it

 

[Amused]

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Aharami
tigers are wild by nature and should not have been introduced to civilization.

So were house cats, dogs, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc...

Or do you think "god" created those animals already domesticated?

There's a tad bit difference between a tiger and cats/dogs/cows/sheep/pigs/chickens/etc.

You're a smart man, think about it

OK, Bulls.

 

[dabuddha]

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Aharami
tigers are wild by nature and should not have been introduced to civilization.

So were house cats, dogs, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc...

Or do you think "god" created those animals already domesticated?

There's a tad bit difference between a tiger and cats/dogs/cows/sheep/pigs/chickens/etc.

You're a smart man, think about it

OK, Bulls.

Theres still a difference. But I do agree with your sentiment that the tiger should not be put down

 

[Amused]

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: dabuddha

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: Aharami
tigers are wild by nature and should not have been introduced to civilization.

So were house cats, dogs, cows, sheep, pigs, chickens, etc...

Or do you think "god" created those animals already domesticated?

There's a tad bit difference between a tiger and cats/dogs/cows/sheep/pigs/chickens/etc.

You're a smart man, think about it

OK, Bulls.

Theres still a difference. But I do agree with your sentiment that the tiger should not be put down

What's the difference? Would tigers be more dangerous than bulls if tigers were domesticated for millennia?

 

[deerslayer]

Where's the damn video?

 

[cressida]

Roy Jones Junior

 

[AbsolutDealage]

Originally posted by: deerslayer
Where's the damn video?

 

[damiano]

Originally posted by: AbsolutDealage

Originally posted by: deerslayer
Where's the damn video?

 

[StageLeft]

Where's the vid? A local radio show made a parody song based on "eye of the tiger". Quite funny

 

[Jhill]

I don't think there is a video.

I don't think the the video on cnn has the attack on it.