Anyone have a Week 51 A64?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Ackbar

Senior member
Dec 18, 2004
391
0
0
Originally posted by: Amaroque
I just recently installed a...

ADA3500DIK4BI
CBBID 0451DPBW
1174045A50080

Booted straight up to 2.6GHz w/o even any type of burn in. I installed it, and had it at 10*260 4x HT within the hour. I still haven't pushed it yet.

Prime95 has ran for over 24 hours straight w/o as much as a hiccup.

Burnin? How do you do that?
 

driphter1

Junior Member
Feb 7, 2005
6
0
0
I have a week 51 3000+ winchester so far i've gotten it up to 2.2 from 1.8 (245x9) with +5%vcore (1.46v), prime95 stable for 3 hours. havnt tried anything higher but when i get the time i'll try to remember to post the results
 

John

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
33,944
4
81
DFI NF4 Ultra-D w/ 201 BIOS
3200+ Winnie
1GB (2x512) DDR400 el cheapo Micron G
OCZ Powerstream 520

ADA3200DIK4BI
CBBHD 0450APFW
1169457L40464

2.6GHz @ 1.5v 260 4x HT
 

Speedo

Senior member
Jan 12, 2000
492
0
0
I have two 3200+ 939 winchester CPU's here. I have only done quick tests so far. Both are week 47 (0447RPMW). So far I have only tried to boot windows, and run one loop of 3DMark. A cheapo 400w PSU was used. Both CPU's used stock cooler and default voltage. They are quite different:

CPU#1 2.45GHz
CPU#2 2.57GHz

I will put the better one in my own system, slap on a XP120 heatsink and use a Seasonic Tornado 400w PSU, up the voltage and see what it can do. Hopefully I get it stable at 2.6GHz.
 

housecat

Banned
Oct 20, 2004
1,426
0
0
0451 3200+, on Asus A8N SLI 2.5ghz semi-stable.. 2.4 prime stable. Booted into XP@2.55.

Getting DFI NF4, see if i get the exact same results or not.
 

chick3nhead

Member
Feb 15, 2005
44
0
0
My 0451 oc's exactly like yours housecat....it hits a wall at 2.6. But im happy with a pretty stable 2.5, still havnt tested in prime because im waiting for my ocz vx. Right now im having to deal with using 256mb b/c my other ram wouldnt work with my board.
 

govtcheez75

Platinum Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,932
0
76
Ok. My new stepping that I got from ZZF was a 0501 (forget the letters), but this one is a better oc'er than the 0451 that I had before. This one easily overclocks to 2500mhz 250x10 with 1.55v, and will boot into windows at 2700mhz. 2500 is the most stable that I've gotten it so fat, but I think it was my ram that was bad. I have IGBLE G.Skill that gets erros on memtest past 250mhz. I sent it back to Newegg to get it RMA'd and it turns out that it was discontinued. I got some PDP Patriot memory...so I'll see how that goes in a few days.
 

Speedo

Senior member
Jan 12, 2000
492
0
0
Ok, my 0447 also seem to be exactly like yours, housecat & chick3nhead. I can boot windows etc. at 2.6GHz, but need to back down to 2.5GHz 1.5v to get it prime stable.

But I'm not so sure the weeks are that important, since I have this other same week CPU, which only seem to do 2.4Ghz...
 

chick3nhead

Member
Feb 15, 2005
44
0
0
Yeah, im thinking its more to do with whether it is CBBID or CBBHD, these are the most common ones with CBBHD being the better overclocker in my reading. Mine of course is CBBID.
 

Speedo

Senior member
Jan 12, 2000
492
0
0
Hmm... not sure about that either. Look at this, two CPU's, one goes to around 2.4, and the other around 2.5:

CPU #1 (2.5GHz)
AMD Athlon 64
ADA3200DIK4BI
CBBHD 0447RPMW
1153497L40051

CPU #2 (2.4GHz)
AMD Athlon 64
ADA3200DIK4BI
CBBHD 0447RPMW
1153497L40154

All the "codes" were identical, except the last three numbers, which I assume is the serial number? I think it could more have to do where it was located on the wafer? As for these two, the first one (051) might have been more in the center, and the "dud" (154) perhaps was further out?
 

chick3nhead

Member
Feb 15, 2005
44
0
0
I wouldnt call 2.4/2.5 "duds". Ive heard lots of people say they only got 2.25 ghz out ot their winchester. Im happy with my completely stable 2.5.
 

Speedo

Senior member
Jan 12, 2000
492
0
0
I reffered to the 2.4 as dud, since it obviously overclocked significantly worse, a bigger difference than I had expected, considering the same codes. On the better of the two, I installed windows at 2.6GHz withouth problems, but to get it prime stable in a warm room I had to go down to 2.5GHz.