PrinceofWands
Lifer
- May 16, 2000
- 13,522
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: George P Burdell
Originally posted by: DrPizza
Which is more likely:
His IQ really is 186
OR
He read his IQ upside down while it was sitting in front of the test administrator:
It's really 98.1
IQ scores are normally distributed with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. [Graph] Statistically, the latter is more likely.
But, everything on the internet is true. So the former must be true.
If the poster really has an IQ of 186, he would almost be a savant and must have got some media coverage. He can easily post said media coverage as proof.
Don't confuse savant with gifted. IQ has little to do with being a savant. IQ is general intellect...computational speed, interaction of various cognitive functions, etc. It isn't knowledge and it isn't savantism. Being a savant means you are beyond classification in a specific area (or more rarely multiple areas). It defies our understanding of IQ completely. Savants will often test average (or quite often a few sd's below average - aka 'idiot savant') on IQ tests. The can just operate in their field in an entirely different way than other people.
