NutBucket
Lifer
- Aug 30, 2000
- 27,085
- 590
- 126
I would argue both. Trust me, in general I don't need the government telling me what I can or can't do. In my home every light except for the two bed-side lamps are CFL or regular florescent. My choice. Hell, even my aquarium is lit with LEDs. Saves me money so I'm going to complain why?The government forced the change, and mandated the phase out of incandescents. CFLs are a false economy. They divert the cost to other locations on the planet, and the energy savings is overstated. They make more sense in public/municipal facilities than they do in the house.
While there are certainly downsides to CFLs, the main one I see people complaining about is color temperature. You can get CFLs is just about color range you like these days. I don't see the basis for the complaint.
But I will be the first to admit it does take getting used the warm-up time of CFLs. Aside from that I haven't had to change a bulb in the last two years.
But ultimately, if you replace bulbs and save money on your energy bill most consumers are going to choose CFL/LED. I think my local utility is prepping for a rate increase this year too....