I feel I should point out the definition of luddite (from google):
a person opposed to new technology or ways of working.
"a small-minded Luddite resisting progress"
I should also point out that we're spending our time on a tech forum talking about how technologically backward we are.
IMO if you're saying no to some particular tech, examine your reasons why. If they boil down to a sullen, arms-folded "I don't wanna", then maybe you're being a bit of a luddite. However if your reasons are logically sound, you're making a choice based on your needs.
For example, like Red Squirrel I don't do "smart" tech, IoT stuff because it has a rep for being poorly secured and reporting marketable data back to the manufacturer. For example, I'd consider the possibility of say CCTV for my home if they would offer the kind of features I want but with a rep for security. The design for this era of tech though is like, "how can we make this report back more and do stuff on the Internet more, even if it makes things more awkward for the end user?", for example many HP all-in-one printers (regarding scanning) are only offered with the option to scan and put the file in your HP cloud account. Windows nags users if the setup isn't cloud connected enough in Microsoft's opinion.
When my customers express concerns about "being left behind", I advise them to have a look around and see what's available from time to time and have a play with it if possible, and if it looks like it might be useful then consider giving it a try. The fact of the matter is we're talking about tools whose functions may not be that useful to many people, or how they function might not work too well for some people. I don't have a tablet because I have a decent desktop PC and a decent phone, and getting a tablet simply means making less use of those other devices which I do need, or not using the tablet. I also have a laptop which I need for occasional mobile use but the desktop is a far more comfortable choice for everyday usage IMO.