Anyone compared Opty 165 and X2 3800+ performance?

perdomot

Golden Member
Dec 7, 2004
1,390
0
76
I wanted to know if anyone has seen a comparison of how these two match up at the same speed. I know the Opty has more cache but am unsure how much a difference this will make. Thanks
 

darksparkz

Junior Member
Jan 6, 2006
6
0
0
I think there are a few reviews comparing more cache and less cache, but I don't think anyone made one between the Opteron and the X2s like that. But since the Opteron 165 is probably only a few dollars more expensive then the X2 3800+, the 165 would be much better then the X2 3800+ The 165 has more cache obviously, but it also runs at a lower stock vcore, which means more headroom for OCing and lower temps.
 

Unkno

Golden Member
Jun 16, 2005
1,659
0
0
if you don't oc the X2 should win out in most applications/games..........it only loses or performs equally with the opteron in application that rely on cache.
 

Unkno

Golden Member
Jun 16, 2005
1,659
0
0
Originally posted by: mrkun
Who on this forum buys a CPU and runs it at stock? =)


those that run mission critical programs and/or servers that needs all the stability it can.
 

richardrds

Senior member
Dec 7, 2004
303
0
0
Originally posted by: Unkno
Originally posted by: mrkun
Who on this forum buys a CPU and runs it at stock? =)


those that run mission critical programs and/or servers that needs all the stability it can.

Yep, unfortunetely for those quys they don't realize that they can safely OC there Opteron's or A64's and still maintain 100% stability with the propper testing!!!

 

Skott

Diamond Member
Oct 4, 2005
5,730
1
76
Not everyone wants to OC their systems and there is nothing wrong with that.
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,353
10,876
136
That was a good read & I don't know haw I managed to miss that article.. thanks!