I think the bus delay is a more likely scenario, than the latter. We will check specially for you guys, how 'bout that? (Don't need to answer that one, we know the answer.)
*Andrew just realizes that he just threw a sliver of meat into a pit of ravenous wolves.*
Originally posted by: Vonkhan
more like a pack of ravenous, psycotic, yuppie wolves with disposable incomes
we need either the HL2 benchmark demo
or
the 9800XT review
or both!!!
give us something to atleast chew upon, throw us a bone!
*growl*
chomp, chomp...
Melikes hardware reviews and fandazidozi game reviews
Have you heard anything yet? Have you heard anything yet? Can you hear me now?
sniff growl growl.
HL2 Benchmark where are you?
sniff growl growl.
HL2 Benchmark where are you?
Originally posted by: Andrew Ku
I will have details later on today: between the afternoon and early evening (EST). Hang tight.
Ahem...Er...not to be a nag, but....You got anything yet?
This HL2 benchmark makes me remember when I was patiently awaiting my XBOX Live Beta tester email last Aug -Sep, it too got delayed but in the end in was definitely worth it.
Jeff7181
Lifer
- Aug 21, 2002
- 18,368
- 11
- 81
Since nobody posted any GeForce FX results yet... here's mine... keep in mind, I ran this test with my FX5900 overclocked to 520/950 using the 45.23 drivers.
ShaderMark v2.0 - DirectX 9 HLSL Pixel Shader Benchmark - ToMMTi-Systems (http://www.tommti-systems.com)
video mode / device info
(1024x768) X8R8G8B8 (D24X8) vram used 56623104
HAL (pure hw vp): NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 (Anti-Detect-Mode: on, gamma correction: DAC)
options
pixel shader version: 2_0
partial precision: off
number of render targets: 1
results:
shader 2 ( Per Pixel Diffuse Lighting): 117 fps 8.5246 mspf 587 rendered frames
shader 3 ( Per Pixel Directional Light Shader (Phong)): 82 fps 12.2349 mspf 409 rendered frames
shader 5 ( Per Pixel Spot Light Shader (Phong)): 65 fps 15.2780 mspf 328 rendered frames
shader 6 ( Per Pixel Anisotropic Lighting): 83 fps 11.9855 mspf 418 rendered frames
shader 7 ( Per Pixel Fresnel Reflections): 71 fps 14.0552 mspf 356 rendered frames
shader 9 ( Per Pixel Car Surface Shader): 30 fps 33.6971 mspf 149 rendered frames
shader 10 ( Per Pixel Environment Mapping): 152 fps 6.5920 mspf 759 rendered frames
shader 11 ( Per Pixel Environment Bump Mapping): 130 fps 7.6781 mspf 652 rendered frames
shader 12 ( Per Pixel Bump Mapping): 64 fps 15.6567 mspf 320 rendered frames
shader 13 ( Per Pixel Shadowed Bump Mapping): 39 fps 25.4730 mspf 197 rendered frames
shader 14 ( Per Pixel Veined Marble Shader): 43 fps 23.3947 mspf 214 rendered frames
shader 15 ( Per Pixel Wood Shader): 60 fps 16.6421 mspf 301 rendered frames
shader 17 ( Fur Shader With Anisotropic Lighting): 6 fps 180.9387 mspf 28 rendered frames
shader 18 ( Per Pixel Refraction and Reflection Shader with Phong Lighting): 25 fps 39.8511 mspf 126 rendered frames
Average = 69 fps
ShaderMark v2.0 - DirectX 9 HLSL Pixel Shader Benchmark - ToMMTi-Systems (http://www.tommti-systems.com)
video mode / device info
(1024x768) X8R8G8B8 (D24X8) vram used 56623104
HAL (pure hw vp): NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 (Anti-Detect-Mode: on, gamma correction: DAC)
options
pixel shader version: 2_0
partial precision: off
number of render targets: 1
results:
shader 2 ( Per Pixel Diffuse Lighting): 117 fps 8.5246 mspf 587 rendered frames
shader 3 ( Per Pixel Directional Light Shader (Phong)): 82 fps 12.2349 mspf 409 rendered frames
shader 5 ( Per Pixel Spot Light Shader (Phong)): 65 fps 15.2780 mspf 328 rendered frames
shader 6 ( Per Pixel Anisotropic Lighting): 83 fps 11.9855 mspf 418 rendered frames
shader 7 ( Per Pixel Fresnel Reflections): 71 fps 14.0552 mspf 356 rendered frames
shader 9 ( Per Pixel Car Surface Shader): 30 fps 33.6971 mspf 149 rendered frames
shader 10 ( Per Pixel Environment Mapping): 152 fps 6.5920 mspf 759 rendered frames
shader 11 ( Per Pixel Environment Bump Mapping): 130 fps 7.6781 mspf 652 rendered frames
shader 12 ( Per Pixel Bump Mapping): 64 fps 15.6567 mspf 320 rendered frames
shader 13 ( Per Pixel Shadowed Bump Mapping): 39 fps 25.4730 mspf 197 rendered frames
shader 14 ( Per Pixel Veined Marble Shader): 43 fps 23.3947 mspf 214 rendered frames
shader 15 ( Per Pixel Wood Shader): 60 fps 16.6421 mspf 301 rendered frames
shader 17 ( Fur Shader With Anisotropic Lighting): 6 fps 180.9387 mspf 28 rendered frames
shader 18 ( Per Pixel Refraction and Reflection Shader with Phong Lighting): 25 fps 39.8511 mspf 126 rendered frames
Average = 69 fps
Jeff7181
Lifer
- Aug 21, 2002
- 18,368
- 11
- 81
And here's some results using the beta 51.75 drivers (same clock speed)... honestly, I couldn't see any difference in image quality... but then again, what I can see at normal resolution, and what can be seen with the image blown up 1000% are two different things
ShaderMark v2.0 - DirectX 9 HLSL Pixel Shader Benchmark - ToMMTi-Systems (http://www.tommti-systems.com)
video mode / device info
(1024x768) X8R8G8B8 (D24X8) vram used 58720256
HAL (pure hw vp): NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 (Anti-Detect-Mode: on, gamma correction: DAC)
options
pixel shader version: 2_0
partial precision: off
number of render targets: 1
results:
shader 2 ( Per Pixel Diffuse Lighting): 156 fps 6.4288 mspf 778 rendered frames
shader 3 ( Per Pixel Directional Light Shader (Phong)): 99 fps 10.1421 mspf 493 rendered frames
shader 5 ( Per Pixel Spot Light Shader (Phong)): 85 fps 11.7477 mspf 426 rendered frames
shader 6 ( Per Pixel Anisotropic Lighting): 99 fps 10.1222 mspf 494 rendered frames
shader 7 ( Per Pixel Fresnel Reflections): 90 fps 11.1154 mspf 450 rendered frames
shader 9 ( Per Pixel Car Surface Shader): 44 fps 22.5460 mspf 222 rendered frames
shader 10 ( Per Pixel Environment Mapping): 191 fps 5.2414 mspf 954 rendered frames
shader 11 ( Per Pixel Environment Bump Mapping): 151 fps 6.6020 mspf 758 rendered frames
shader 12 ( Per Pixel Bump Mapping): 79 fps 12.6497 mspf 396 rendered frames
shader 13 ( Per Pixel Shadowed Bump Mapping): 46 fps 21.8164 mspf 230 rendered frames
shader 14 ( Per Pixel Veined Marble Shader): 61 fps 16.4579 mspf 304 rendered frames
shader 15 ( Per Pixel Wood Shader): 59 fps 16.9693 mspf 295 rendered frames
shader 16 ( Per Pixel Tile Shader): 41 fps 24.1618 mspf 207 rendered frames
shader 17 ( Fur Shader With Anisotropic Lighting): 7 fps 147.3336 mspf 35 rendered frames
shader 18 ( Per Pixel Refraction and Reflection Shader with Phong Lighting): 35 fps 28.7382 mspf 174 rendered frames
Average = 83 fps
ShaderMark v2.0 - DirectX 9 HLSL Pixel Shader Benchmark - ToMMTi-Systems (http://www.tommti-systems.com)
video mode / device info
(1024x768) X8R8G8B8 (D24X8) vram used 58720256
HAL (pure hw vp): NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 (Anti-Detect-Mode: on, gamma correction: DAC)
options
pixel shader version: 2_0
partial precision: off
number of render targets: 1
results:
shader 2 ( Per Pixel Diffuse Lighting): 156 fps 6.4288 mspf 778 rendered frames
shader 3 ( Per Pixel Directional Light Shader (Phong)): 99 fps 10.1421 mspf 493 rendered frames
shader 5 ( Per Pixel Spot Light Shader (Phong)): 85 fps 11.7477 mspf 426 rendered frames
shader 6 ( Per Pixel Anisotropic Lighting): 99 fps 10.1222 mspf 494 rendered frames
shader 7 ( Per Pixel Fresnel Reflections): 90 fps 11.1154 mspf 450 rendered frames
shader 9 ( Per Pixel Car Surface Shader): 44 fps 22.5460 mspf 222 rendered frames
shader 10 ( Per Pixel Environment Mapping): 191 fps 5.2414 mspf 954 rendered frames
shader 11 ( Per Pixel Environment Bump Mapping): 151 fps 6.6020 mspf 758 rendered frames
shader 12 ( Per Pixel Bump Mapping): 79 fps 12.6497 mspf 396 rendered frames
shader 13 ( Per Pixel Shadowed Bump Mapping): 46 fps 21.8164 mspf 230 rendered frames
shader 14 ( Per Pixel Veined Marble Shader): 61 fps 16.4579 mspf 304 rendered frames
shader 15 ( Per Pixel Wood Shader): 59 fps 16.9693 mspf 295 rendered frames
shader 16 ( Per Pixel Tile Shader): 41 fps 24.1618 mspf 207 rendered frames
shader 17 ( Fur Shader With Anisotropic Lighting): 7 fps 147.3336 mspf 35 rendered frames
shader 18 ( Per Pixel Refraction and Reflection Shader with Phong Lighting): 35 fps 28.7382 mspf 174 rendered frames
Average = 83 fps
*me thinks we have been run up an ally and left there*
Its all too much, I can't handle it! Even if you have no news, its still news, lol..... Pretty please?
Its all too much, I can't handle it! Even if you have no news, its still news, lol..... Pretty please?
Where's shader's 19-23? What are your results at stock 5900 speeds or overclocked 5900 Ultra speeds?
- Aug 22, 2001
- 32,062
- 32,582
- 146
The FX doesn't meet all of shadermark's requirements so it skips those tests, you'll notice test 4&8 are missing as well. Jeff's NV35 looks blazingly fast compared to my NV30, my avg. FPS is a horrendous 48.2@stock 500/1ghz and actually drop to 47.6 overclocked to 535/1.1ghz
*I ran stock and O/C of mem/core settings through 3 passes each to obtain avg. scores with reboot in between*
- Aug 22, 2001
- 32,062
- 32,582
- 146
I ran it with the 45.23's, I'll load the 51's long enough to run the bench with 'em and see what it does....
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter