Behrend, huh? I've got quite a few buddies up there right now as freshman. You might've already met them!Originally posted by: Jeff7
Geez, strict campus. Maybe they could just disallow file attachments in POP3 e-mails? Sounds like a lazy approach, like what Microsoft initially did to Outlook when it was found that it was being used to send viruses with ease - they simply stopped allowing ANY executable file attachments. Nice security, sure, but it was a pain when sending someone a compressed self-extracting EXE, or a file if they deleted their Show Desktop icon, or something to that effect.
Campus here (Penn State University, Erie campus) - I've got POP3, SMTP, full Internet, etc. All of the campus service websites that require any kind of login use 128-bit encryption. Prety impressive job. But do keep at the admins to get POP3 and SMTP support added. Plenty of people have POP3 e-mail accounts; disallowing it isn't cool.
Originally posted by: archcommus
Behrend, huh? I've got quite a few buddies up there right now as freshman. You might've already met them!Originally posted by: Jeff7
Geez, strict campus. Maybe they could just disallow file attachments in POP3 e-mails? Sounds like a lazy approach, like what Microsoft initially did to Outlook when it was found that it was being used to send viruses with ease - they simply stopped allowing ANY executable file attachments. Nice security, sure, but it was a pain when sending someone a compressed self-extracting EXE, or a file if they deleted their Show Desktop icon, or something to that effect.
Campus here (Penn State University, Erie campus) - I've got POP3, SMTP, full Internet, etc. All of the campus service websites that require any kind of login use 128-bit encryption. Prety impressive job. But do keep at the admins to get POP3 and SMTP support added. Plenty of people have POP3 e-mail accounts; disallowing it isn't cool.
This is exactly what angers me, though. If so many other campuses allow it just fine, W-T-F is my school thinking. They're the only ones around that feel POP3 is unsafe?
Hmm don't think so....Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: archcommus
Behrend, huh? I've got quite a few buddies up there right now as freshman. You might've already met them!Originally posted by: Jeff7
Geez, strict campus. Maybe they could just disallow file attachments in POP3 e-mails? Sounds like a lazy approach, like what Microsoft initially did to Outlook when it was found that it was being used to send viruses with ease - they simply stopped allowing ANY executable file attachments. Nice security, sure, but it was a pain when sending someone a compressed self-extracting EXE, or a file if they deleted their Show Desktop icon, or something to that effect.
Campus here (Penn State University, Erie campus) - I've got POP3, SMTP, full Internet, etc. All of the campus service websites that require any kind of login use 128-bit encryption. Prety impressive job. But do keep at the admins to get POP3 and SMTP support added. Plenty of people have POP3 e-mail accounts; disallowing it isn't cool.
This is exactly what angers me, though. If so many other campuses allow it just fine, W-T-F is my school thinking. They're the only ones around that feel POP3 is unsafe?
Drop out.
What???Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
There were no problems when you checked the school out.
There were no problems when you visitted the school.
There were no problems when you talked to members of the staff and faculty.
There were no problems when you talked to current students.
Why is there a problem now?![]()
Originally posted by: archcommus
What???Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
There were no problems when you checked the school out.
There were no problems when you visitted the school.
There were no problems when you talked to members of the staff and faculty.
There were no problems when you talked to current students.
Why is there a problem now?![]()
This sounds intriguing but I have to run for now. Will read later. Thanks for a suggestion!Originally posted by: Aves
Sign up for Yahoo! Mail and set it up to retrieve your mail from the POP3 server. Then you can use YPOPs! to get into your mail client.
I, uh, didn't exactly study the network policies of all of the schools I looked at and considered. Besides, even if I would've known, I wouldn't have let something like POP access deter me from wanting to go to an otherwise awesome school.Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Originally posted by: archcommus
What???Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
There were no problems when you checked the school out.
There were no problems when you visitted the school.
There were no problems when you talked to members of the staff and faculty.
There were no problems when you talked to current students.
Why is there a problem now?![]()
You didn't have problems with the policy previously, why the change of heart?
Trust me, I want to, but money is too tight to just go tossing $30/month around for that. Plus I'd need a modem, and I'd probably have to get a full year contract, and end up paying for it when I'm not in school.Originally posted by: yukichigai
I say you should really consider paying for your own DSL or Cable internet. Universities are getting into this new mode of thinking where they decide that highspeed internet on campus should provide you with nothing but http access. Bulls%$#. 5 years ago they could afford to let everyone game online and run as many f%$#ing fileservers as they wanted, and nobody had a problem with it. Now, suddenly, "it costs too much." Right. Either the Universities are full of crap, or the broadband companies are taking advantage of them. Someone is profiteering here, and the students are bearing the brunt of it.
So... yeah, DSL or Cable.
Originally posted by: yukichigai
I say you should really consider paying for your own DSL or Cable internet. Universities are getting into this new mode of thinking where they decide that highspeed internet on campus should provide you with nothing but http access. Bulls%$#. 5 years ago they could afford to let everyone game online and run as many f%$#ing fileservers as they wanted, and nobody had a problem with it. Now, suddenly, "it costs too much." Right. Either the Universities are full of crap, or the broadband companies are taking advantage of them. Someone is profiteering here, and the students are bearing the brunt of it.
So... yeah, DSL or Cable.
I don't doubt that, but to what do you attribute this sudden rise of interest in donkey porn?Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
5 years ago downloading 5GB in a day was done by the geeks. Today it's done by grandmothers downloading donkey porn. The speeds haven't increased a lot, but the "needs" of the users have.
Under Federal law, if you move you can move your service with you. If the company cannot or will not move the service to your new residence then you are legally entitled to cancel the contract without fear of an early termination fee or anything else. I'm not sure if you're willing to take your Cable/DSL with you, but at the very least if you can't use it you won't have to pay for it.Originally posted by: archcommus
Trust me, I want to, but money is too tight to just go tossing $30/month around for that. Plus I'd need a modem, and I'd probably have to get a full year contract, and end up paying for it when I'm not in school.
Originally posted by: yukichigai
I don't doubt that, but to what do you attribute this sudden rise of interest in donkey porn?Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
5 years ago downloading 5GB in a day was done by the geeks. Today it's done by grandmothers downloading donkey porn. The speeds haven't increased a lot, but the "needs" of the users have.![]()
Originally posted by: archcommus
Trust me, I want to, but money is too tight to just go tossing $30/month around for that. Plus I'd need a modem, and I'd probably have to get a full year contract, and end up paying for it when I'm not in school.Originally posted by: yukichigai
I say you should really consider paying for your own DSL or Cable internet. Universities are getting into this new mode of thinking where they decide that highspeed internet on campus should provide you with nothing but http access. Bulls%$#. 5 years ago they could afford to let everyone game online and run as many f%$#ing fileservers as they wanted, and nobody had a problem with it. Now, suddenly, "it costs too much." Right. Either the Universities are full of crap, or the broadband companies are taking advantage of them. Someone is profiteering here, and the students are bearing the brunt of it.
So... yeah, DSL or Cable.
And OMG. Now even GMAIL'S WEBSITE isn't working half the time. I have to refresh it like a dozen times to get it to load. In the meantime, it keeps showing me this. What bullsh!t.
Originally posted by: yukichigai
I say you should really consider paying for your own DSL or Cable internet. Universities are getting into this new mode of thinking where they decide that highspeed internet on campus should provide you with nothing but http access. Bulls%$#. 5 years ago they could afford to let everyone game online and run as many f%$#ing fileservers as they wanted, and nobody had a problem with it. Now, suddenly, "it costs too much." Right. Either the Universities are full of crap, or the broadband companies are taking advantage of them. Someone is profiteering here, and the students are bearing the brunt of it.
So... yeah, DSL or Cable.
We're sorry, but your argument could not be processed at this time in part because it lacked the following:Originally posted by: spidey07
The landscape of free for all internet has drastically changed in the last 5 years, thanks in part to P2P.
Go design a couple college networks, take into account security and total cost of operation then come back and explain your rash accusation.
You know little of what you speak. Very, very, very little. I'm not gonna poke holes in yor post about "broadband" and even utter the words that you wouldn't even grasp.
there is no profiteering here, there is no conspiracy, put down the tinfoil hat and learn some before you utter such bullcrap.
The entire network communications industry shifted about 5 years ago due to network security wise.
Sorry to be so harsh, but you guys are off your rocker here.
Originally posted by: yukichigai
We're sorry, but your argument could not be processed at this time in part because it lacked the following:Originally posted by: spidey07
The landscape of free for all internet has drastically changed in the last 5 years, thanks in part to P2P.
Go design a couple college networks, take into account security and total cost of operation then come back and explain your rash accusation.
You know little of what you speak. Very, very, very little. I'm not gonna poke holes in yor post about "broadband" and even utter the words that you wouldn't even grasp.
there is no profiteering here, there is no conspiracy, put down the tinfoil hat and learn some before you utter such bullcrap.
The entire network communications industry shifted about 5 years ago due to network security wise.
Sorry to be so harsh, but you guys are off your rocker here.
Proper use of paragraphs
Facts
An actual argument
Additionally, the Insult per Word Index (IWI) of your submission indicates you are attempting to sumbit a "groundless flame". If so, you have used the incorrect submission form. Instead please use our Flame Submission Form, which can be found here.
I also have a point: you want to make an argument, make an argument. Don't insult me and expect me to actually care what you say.Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Don't be stupid. He has a point, and it's a good one.
Originally posted by: yukichigai
I also have a point: you want to make an argument, make an argument. Don't insult me and expect me to actually care what you say.Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Don't be stupid. He has a point, and it's a good one.
