<< It'd be nice if someone could do a study to determine how many people actually have problems that are due to the chipset and not to user error or faulty drivers or whatever. Until then I don't think we'll know for sure how many problems are due to VIA. I think a lot of problems fall under the heading of "well, something's wrong, it must be the chipset." It's hard to get a statistically valid sample from a user, me for example, who has built a few systems. I could say, "Well, I've NEVER had a problem with ANY Via chipset on any system I've built!" And that would be true, except that I've only used three different motherboards with VIA chipsets. Statistically, it's not a valid sample. I have a KT266A system right now and I love it. And I'll probably keep using VIA-based motherboards unless I have a horrible experience along the way somewhere. I'm rambling, but basically it seems to boil down to personal experience, just like with many things in life. If you like Chevy, you'll keep buying Chevy no matter how many other people tell you how much they suck and they don't work right and on and on. What matters most is what YOU experience. Some people never have a problem with VIA motherboards, others do. I don't think anyone knows for sure what the real truth is, though. >>
It's not that Chevy doesn't work, it's just that it sucks (other than the Corvette). But I digress. The majority of people never have problems with Via, but more people have problems with Via than do people with SiS, Acer Laboratories, inc. (ALi), or nVidia.