any point to on die graphics if laptop has seperate nvidia card?

RadNow

Junior Member
Jan 13, 2011
19
0
0
Is there any point to the chip having the integrated graphics such as sandy bridge if you are going to have a seperate nvidia card?

I am having second thoughts about getting the sandy bridge architecture and may just go with the intel core chip or something to save money.
 

OS

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
15,581
1
76
doesn't nvidia optimus switch between integrated and discrete based on performance on demand?
 
Dec 10, 2005
24,959
8,167
136
Why would you go with an earlier generation Intel processor over Sandy Bridge? Even if you don't use the SB integrated graphics, the processor is still significantly faster than previous generations.
 

PeeluckyDuckee

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
4,464
0
0
The newer integrated graphics is faster and more energy efficient, with the ability to switch gears to a dedicated GPU for more intensive work. Win win imo.
 

Zap

Elite Member
Oct 13, 1999
22,377
2
81
I am having second thoughts about getting the sandy bridge architecture and may just go with the intel core chip or something to save money.

Unless you can't afford a notebook with a Sandy Bridge CPU, there is no reason to get anything older. Even if you completely ignore the integrated graphics, a Sandy Bridge notebook will perform better, run cooler and have better battery life than any Core 2 based notebook except for ULV versions, which will run cool but perform even worse.
 

gsaldivar

Diamond Member
Apr 30, 2001
8,691
1
81
Is there any point to the chip having the integrated graphics such as sandy bridge if you are going to have a seperate nvidia card?

Having both allows you to the flexibility of switching as needed to maximize performance or battery life, or to minimize fan noise, heat... etc.
 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
239
106
Operational efficiency will be greater with Sandy Bridge. Unless there is some sort of game fetish involved, there's no reason to use Nvidia.
 

gsaldivar

Diamond Member
Apr 30, 2001
8,691
1
81
Operational efficiency will be greater with Sandy Bridge. Unless there is some sort of game fetish involved, there's no reason to use Nvidia.

Non-gaming discrete GPU uses: Business graphics, CAD/CAM, Graphic Design (Photoshop, etc), Hardware video codec assist...
 

StrangerGuy

Diamond Member
May 9, 2004
8,443
124
106
Is there any point to the chip having the integrated graphics such as sandy bridge if you are going to have a seperate nvidia card?

I am having second thoughts about getting the sandy bridge architecture and may just go with the intel core chip or something to save money.

The entire point is to save power. Keeping the discrete GPU on while during office work is going to drain a lot of unnecessary battery life.
 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
239
106
I suspect that there will not be noticeable visual difference between a SandyBridge based display and the Nvidia on a 14-in display at native resolution in any of those programs.

OTH, since OP already has the Nvidia GPU, does it makes sense to spend more $$$ to get Sandy Bridge? IMHO, no. Stick with the Nvidia as long as it does the job, and save some bucks.
 
Last edited:

alent1234

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2002
3,915
0
0
adobe flash has supported hardware assisted playback on intel GPU's going back a few years. unless you play games or do something like photoshop where there is GPU optimization in there you are wasting money buying a GPU laptop. even my core i5 intel graphics plays Mass Effect and older games OK