Originally posted by: Skoorb
Better than Ford but it's not Toyota. That's if you're talking reliability.
If you're talking all out pimpedness it's better than Ford but it's no Nissan![]()
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Better than Ford but it's not Toyota. That's if you're talking reliability.
If you're talking all out pimpedness it's better than Ford but it's no Nissan![]()
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Better than Ford but it's not Toyota. That's if you're talking reliability.
If you're talking all out pimpedness it's better than Ford but it's no Nissan![]()
Originally posted by: Millennium
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Better than Ford but it's not Toyota. That's if you're talking reliability.
If you're talking all out pimpedness it's better than Ford but it's no Nissan![]()
You bastard.
Originally posted by: dawop
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Better than Ford but it's not Toyota. That's if you're talking reliability.
If you're talking all out pimpedness it's better than Ford but it's no Nissan![]()
I agree, I had a Maxima and that was my all time favorite.
Mine too!Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: dawop
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Better than Ford but it's not Toyota. That's if you're talking reliability.
If you're talking all out pimpedness it's better than Ford but it's no Nissan![]()
I agree, I had a Maxima and that was my all time favorite.
thats my all time favorite too![]()
Originally posted by: Millennium
BTW, incidentally I have crash tested a Mazda 626 Rental Car. Old bag hit me on the interstate outside of Starkville, MS. The POS fell apart like a French Infantry division in the middle of a firefight.
Originally posted by: RossMAN
Originally posted by: Skoorb
Better than Ford but it's not Toyota. That's if you're talking reliability.
If you're talking all out pimpedness it's better than Ford but it's no Nissan![]()
Sadly, I agree with the Canadian![]()
Originally posted by: rbloedow
Having work done on it costs WAY too much.
Originally posted by: dawop
Why do you say that?Originally posted by: rbloedow Having work done on it costs WAY too much.
Originally posted by: rbloedow
Originally posted by: dawop
Why do you say that?Originally posted by: rbloedow Having work done on it costs WAY too much.
My family has owned quite a few Mazdas (929, MPV, Protege) and we've always found that having work done at the dealership is more costly than our other non-mazda vehicles. Not to mention Mazda doesn't really have a clean record when it comes to reliability. My father had to have the engine in his 929 replaced (after only 90k miles) because the price to rebuild it cost more than a new engineBut then again, if you're having most of your work done at the dealership, expect to get screwed.
Originally posted by: Thera
I paid cash in 1996 for a '93 626 LX. I've done regular maintence on it and I've not had any troubles. The only semi-major thing I did was replace both front axles, which cost less than $400. Also be aware that the rear brake calipers will probably fail to recompress when you have the brakes done, but that's not a big deal.
The main problem with older Mazdas is that they have a pretty hit or miss service record. Some model years are awesome while others are much worse than average (all documented). And then they have models like the 929 which was a total joke.
Better than Ford but it's not Toyota. That's if you're talking reliability.
