Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: Jzero
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: TwinkleToes77
Yeah pediatrician did it. Anyways. Infant tattoes and branding are already here. My friend does tattoes and he was telling me that atleast every 2 weeks someone asks him to tattoo their kid. He refuses and tells them to go elsewhere... unfortunately.. they do.
Ear piercing though isnt a big deal for baby girls. You cant tell I have them pierced unless i have earrings in. Last time i wore earrings was for a few hours on my wedding day..
I find it funny how someone can condemn one form of scarring infants and then in the next sentance condone another form that's really basically the same thing, just because his or her friends/family/social group/etc has deemed the second one more acceptable.
There's a big difference. If I get my kid AC/DC ear rings, at least she can take them out and all that's left are barely noticeable pinholes.
They're still holes. And if the only thing that matters is how noticeable it is, then I guess it's ok to put a tattoo on a baby's ass. I mean, it's not noticeable when he wears pants. At what point does the scarring become unacceptable? 1/8" sq. of scarred skin? 1/2" sq? 10 sq in? What's your cutoff point for when scarring a baby becomes a bad idea?
I think it's obvious by my response - tiny holes in the ears.