Because at the moment you're stuck in an endless loop of "find the best SSD drive". You're probably imagining the poor 840 Evo owners are cursed with some of the slowest drives in history, which could not be further from the truth. My work machine uses a PM 851 drive, which is the OEM version of the 840 EVO. The drive works just fine, especially after the firmware upgrade, and although it's not as fast as the Pro tier drives, you would be hard pressed to notice slowdowns of the machine due to read performance degradation.
Moving on, there is no proof out there, either from forum members or the press, that 850 Evo is even partially affected by this issue. The drive has been on sale for 6 months already, no one rang any bells as of yet.
Furthermore, according to this
Techreport article,
it takes Samsung 19nm TLC NAND 8 weeks to degrade: that's 2 months.
It also takes Samsung 21nm TLC NAND 40 weeks to degrade. Therefore owners of the original 840 saw read performance degradation after 10 months. In other words, it takes 5 times more time for 21nm Samsung TLC to degrade as much as 19nm TLC. Meanwhile the 850 EVO is made using 40nm TLC, cells are a few times bigger and Samsung claims 10x reduction in voltage state overlaps. If we were to follow this fear mongering mumble that 850 EVO is plagued by the same problem, performance degradation would have to be significantly slower than 21nm TLC, in the area of 3x-5x.
It might take 850 EVO from 2 to 4 years to start showing read performance degradation. If it happens at all. Are you ready to wait that long?
My advice to you is to choose a brand and buy a SSD with decent reviews and low price: Crucial, Samsung, SandDisk, OCZ (Toshiba), Intel, and others. Enjoy the performance boost and learn more in the process.