any handgun gurus?

huberm

Golden Member
Dec 17, 2004
1,105
1
0
I am interested in getting a new handgun, but not sure what to look for. I know I want a Ruger, but thats all I've concluded so far.

I want it to be fairly light, and comfortable while concealing (I plan to carry it sometimes once I get my permit). I also have fairly large hands, so it can't feel too small. As far as bullet size, I just want something that will effectively stop someone from harming me if I shoot them.

Oh, and I'm left handed, if that makes any difference. Any recommendations?
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
Originally posted by: huberm
I am interested in getting a new handgun, but not sure what to look for. I know I want a Ruger, but thats all I've concluded so far.

I want it to be fairly light, and comfortable while concealing (I plan to carry it sometimes once I get my permit). I also have fairly large hands, so it can't feel too small. As far as bullet size, I just want something that will effectively stop someone from harming me if I shoot them.

Oh, and I'm left handed, if that makes any difference. Any recommendations?

I have a Springfield XD .45 GAP compact. Small enough to conceal, but not too small, and those .45 rounds that effectively stop your target better than almost any other round.
 

PowerMacG5

Diamond Member
Apr 14, 2002
7,701
0
0
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: huberm
I am interested in getting a new handgun, but not sure what to look for. I know I want a Ruger, but thats all I've concluded so far.

I want it to be fairly light, and comfortable while concealing (I plan to carry it sometimes once I get my permit). I also have fairly large hands, so it can't feel too small. As far as bullet size, I just want something that will effectively stop someone from harming me if I shoot them.

Oh, and I'm left handed, if that makes any difference. Any recommendations?

I have a Springfield XD .45 GAP compact. Small enough to conceal, but not too small, and those .45 rounds that effectively stop your target better than almost any other round.

Is there an echo in here?
 
Aug 23, 2000
15,509
1
81
Ruger and light don't belong in the same sentance.

a 9mm is plenty for CC. a P89 is a good gun if you get some rubber grips for it.
I had a p89 and it was a reliable good shooter. Ruger semi-autos are definatly a good bargin for the price.
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Ruger and light don't belong in the same sentance.

a 9mm is plenty for CC. a P89 is a good gun if you get some rubber grips for it.
I had a p89 and it was a reliable good shooter. Ruger semi-autos are definatly a good bargin for the price.

I've heard stories of guys getting hit multiple times with 9mm and living. Remember, you don't shoot to wound, you shoot to kill. If the criminal lives, he may just live to sue your ass for shooting him.
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Ruger and light don't belong in the same sentance.

a 9mm is plenty for CC. a P89 is a good gun if you get some rubber grips for it.
I had a p89 and it was a reliable good shooter. Ruger semi-autos are definatly a good bargin for the price.

I've heard stories of guys getting hit multiple times with 9mm and living. Remember, you don't shoot to wound, you shoot to kill. If the criminal lives, he may just live to sue your ass for shooting him.

fvck then, might as well go for a .50 cal desert eagle right?
 

Stuxnet

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2005
8,392
1
0
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Ruger and light don't belong in the same sentance.

a 9mm is plenty for CC. a P89 is a good gun if you get some rubber grips for it.
I had a p89 and it was a reliable good shooter. Ruger semi-autos are definatly a good bargin for the price.

I've heard stories of guys getting hit multiple times with 9mm and living. Remember, you don't shoot to wound, you shoot to kill. If the criminal lives, he may just live to sue your ass for shooting him.

Whether you shoot them in a foot with a 9mm or a .45, they're probably going to live.

WHERE you hit them counts for quite a bit more than the caliber. If you can't accurately fire a .45, then who cares how much stopping power it has.

FWIW, I've read that many LOE's carry 9mm off-duty.

If you want a good mid-range caliber, try a .40SW. It's what I fire and I love it.
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Ruger and light don't belong in the same sentance.

a 9mm is plenty for CC. a P89 is a good gun if you get some rubber grips for it.
I had a p89 and it was a reliable good shooter. Ruger semi-autos are definatly a good bargin for the price.

I've heard stories of guys getting hit multiple times with 9mm and living. Remember, you don't shoot to wound, you shoot to kill. If the criminal lives, he may just live to sue your ass for shooting him.

fvck then, might as well go for a .50 cal desert eagle right?

Nope, those are extremely impracticle. They are not only tough to handel and shoot, but they actually don't stop as well as a .45 round because the bullets generally go right through the target (it's better for a bullet to tear through and stay in the chest). If you're looking for stopping power with magnum rounds, go with a .357, it's the perfect balance.

 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
Originally posted by: jbourne77

Whether you shoot them in a foot with a 9mm or a .45, they're probably going to live.

WHERE you hit them counts for quite a bit more than the caliber. If you can't accurately fire a .45, then who cares how much stopping power it has.

FWIW, I've read that many LOE's carry 9mm off-duty.

If you want a good mid-range caliber, try a .40SW. It's what I fire and I love it.

But compare that with hitting somebody in the chest. Some guys have been known to take several 9mm rounds in the chest and still run and live. That usually never happens with .45 rounds.

I agree with the .40 cal though. It's becoming a very popular pistol for a reason.
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Ruger and light don't belong in the same sentance.

a 9mm is plenty for CC. a P89 is a good gun if you get some rubber grips for it.
I had a p89 and it was a reliable good shooter. Ruger semi-autos are definatly a good bargin for the price.

I've heard stories of guys getting hit multiple times with 9mm and living. Remember, you don't shoot to wound, you shoot to kill. If the criminal lives, he may just live to sue your ass for shooting him.

fvck then, might as well go for a .50 cal desert eagle right?

Nope, those are extremely impracticle. They are not only tough to handel and shoot, but they actually don't stop as well as a .45 round because the bullets generally go right through the target. If you're looking for stopping power with magnum rounds, go with a .357, it's the perfect balance.

I don't know who told you that. The .50 AE is only going 1400fps. Now, no doubt that's a good deal faster than a .45 ACPs 800-900fps, but it's also a wider bullet. A Speer Gold Dot 300 grain .50 AE wouldn't go right through a person. It would hurt them severely.

But a Desert Eagle is terribly impractical and expensive, as are the other weapons chambered in .50 AE.

Other things:
A 9mm will kill someone just as well as a .45.
Ruger's are cheap junk, IMO. Unreliable and ugly.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,385
45,839
136
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Ruger and light don't belong in the same sentance.

a 9mm is plenty for CC. a P89 is a good gun if you get some rubber grips for it.
I had a p89 and it was a reliable good shooter. Ruger semi-autos are definatly a good bargin for the price.

I've heard stories of guys getting hit multiple times with 9mm and living. Remember, you don't shoot to wound, you shoot to kill. If the criminal lives, he may just live to sue your ass for shooting him.

Load it with +P+ JHPs and I doubt you'll encounter that probem. I feed my Ruger P89T a fairly steady diet of +P and +P+ ammo and it keeps on going. They are strong, reliable budget guns though they have the beauty of a brick.

If the OP wants pistol with full ambi controls you'll have to look at the HK P2000, the S&W M&P, and a couple others.
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: jbourne77

Whether you shoot them in a foot with a 9mm or a .45, they're probably going to live.

WHERE you hit them counts for quite a bit more than the caliber. If you can't accurately fire a .45, then who cares how much stopping power it has.

FWIW, I've read that many LOE's carry 9mm off-duty.

If you want a good mid-range caliber, try a .40SW. It's what I fire and I love it.

But compare that with hitting somebody in the chest. Some guys have been known to take several 9mm rounds in the chest and still run and live. That usually never happens with .45 rounds.

I agree with the .40 cal though. It's becoming a very popular pistol for a reason.

I've been involved in more than one shooting with a 9mm. Both times the badguy went down with one shot. Here's a picture of a Speer Gold Dot .45 ACP next to a Speer Gold Dot 9mm. Want to get shot with either?

Pic.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,385
45,839
136
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Ruger and light don't belong in the same sentance.

a 9mm is plenty for CC. a P89 is a good gun if you get some rubber grips for it.
I had a p89 and it was a reliable good shooter. Ruger semi-autos are definatly a good bargin for the price.

I've heard stories of guys getting hit multiple times with 9mm and living. Remember, you don't shoot to wound, you shoot to kill. If the criminal lives, he may just live to sue your ass for shooting him.

fvck then, might as well go for a .50 cal desert eagle right?

Nope, those are extremely impracticle. They are not only tough to handel and shoot, but they actually don't stop as well as a .45 round because the bullets generally go right through the target. If you're looking for stopping power with magnum rounds, go with a .357, it's the perfect balance.

I don't know who told you that. The .50 AE is only going 1400fps. Now, no doubt that's a good deal faster than a .45 ACPs 800-900fps, but it's also a wider bullet. A Speer Gold Dot 300 grain .50 AE wouldn't go right through a person. It would hurt them severely.

But a Desert Eagle is terribly impractical and expensive, as are the other weapons chambered in .50 AE.

Other things:
A 9mm will kill someone just as well as a .45.
Ruger's are cheap junk, IMO. Unreliable and ugly.

I've found their P89s to be pretty damn reliable, though I know some people have trouble with their .45s
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Ruger and light don't belong in the same sentance.

a 9mm is plenty for CC. a P89 is a good gun if you get some rubber grips for it.
I had a p89 and it was a reliable good shooter. Ruger semi-autos are definatly a good bargin for the price.

I've heard stories of guys getting hit multiple times with 9mm and living. Remember, you don't shoot to wound, you shoot to kill. If the criminal lives, he may just live to sue your ass for shooting him.

fvck then, might as well go for a .50 cal desert eagle right?

Nope, those are extremely impracticle. They are not only tough to handel and shoot, but they actually don't stop as well as a .45 round because the bullets generally go right through the target (it's better for a bullet to tear through and stay in the chest). If you're looking for stopping power with magnum rounds, go with a .357, it's the perfect balance.

guess i should have used the :roll: emoticon after that.

i was making fun of you saying that a .45 is better because you heard stories that people lived through being hsot multiple times with a 9mm.

like the other guy said, it matters where you shoot, not the caliber size.
 

dnuggett

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2003
6,703
0
76
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: pontifex
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Ruger and light don't belong in the same sentance.

a 9mm is plenty for CC. a P89 is a good gun if you get some rubber grips for it.
I had a p89 and it was a reliable good shooter. Ruger semi-autos are definatly a good bargin for the price.

I've heard stories of guys getting hit multiple times with 9mm and living. Remember, you don't shoot to wound, you shoot to kill. If the criminal lives, he may just live to sue your ass for shooting him.

fvck then, might as well go for a .50 cal desert eagle right?

Nope, those are extremely impracticle. They are not only tough to handel and shoot, but they actually don't stop as well as a .45 round because the bullets generally go right through the target. If you're looking for stopping power with magnum rounds, go with a .357, it's the perfect balance.

I don't know who told you that. The .50 AE is only going 1400fps. Now, no doubt that's a good deal faster than a .45 ACPs 800-900fps, but it's also a wider bullet. A Speer Gold Dot 300 grain .50 AE wouldn't go right through a person. It would hurt them severely.

But a Desert Eagle is terribly impractical and expensive, as are the other weapons chambered in .50 AE.

Other things:
A 9mm will kill someone just as well as a .45.
Ruger's are cheap junk, IMO. Unreliable and ugly.


Ruger's are ugly I agree. Not cheap junk though, not at all. I had a P90 I have since sold , that had around 20k rounds through it, with the original barrel. Great gun, never a problem. If I could pick another one up at a price that made sense I'd do it.

The closest thing to a Ruger with looks is the 345.

side note- it always cracks me up when you people talk about the effectiveness of one caliber over another, like any of you truly know what you are talking about besides what you read after some jello test was conducted. The 9mm round is a great round, and if any of you think it won't stop someone, take a well placed one for the team. Let's see if you can post the results.

BTW... getting shot in the chest is not always a game over event no matter if it's a .357, 9mm, .357 SIG, .40, .45 or anything else. There is a lot tissue mass and bone in the chest, and unless you tag a vital organ AND damage that organ it may not be game over.

If I were new to handguns and looking for one, I'd get a 9mm to start. Learn it. No one can pick up a gun and just shoot it effectively right away, much less if their life depended on it. 9mm is a caliber where you can put a lot of rounds out cheaply while you learn.

If I were you I'd look at a P90 if you had to have a Ruger. In 9mm I own a Sig P226 (one of the best 9mm made, period), and a Glock 22 fitted with a 9mm interchangeable barrel.

I'd recommend the Sig 226, Glock 17, 19 or Springfiled XD9. The Beretta 92FS is a nice gun as well, but maybe a bit too finicky for a newb. If you are into nostalgia and don't mind paying a premium a Browning HiPower is a good choice as well. Some of the S&W pieces that NYPD uses (in 9mm for all you toolbox naysayers) model 4506 I believe would be a fine choice too.
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
Originally posted by: pontifex


guess i should have used the :roll: emoticon after that.

i was making fun of you saying that a .45 is better because you heard stories that people lived through being hsot multiple times with a 9mm.

like the other guy said, it matters where you shoot, not the caliber size.

That plays a huge part in it. I still stand by the fact that there have been many more cases where people simply won't go down with a 9mm shot to the chest. This happens less often with a .45.

http://www.handloads.com/misc/stoppingpower.asp?Caliber=0

As you can see, the .45s have proven to be more effective at stopping their target.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,574
972
126
Originally posted by: huberm
I am interested in getting a new handgun, but not sure what to look for. I know I want a Ruger, but thats all I've concluded so far.

I want it to be fairly light, and comfortable while concealing (I plan to carry it sometimes once I get my permit). I also have fairly large hands, so it can't feel too small. As far as bullet size, I just want something that will effectively stop someone from harming me if I shoot them.

Oh, and I'm left handed, if that makes any difference. Any recommendations?

Is this your first handgun? If so, I recommend a .357 Magnum revolver. You can shoot .38 Special through it all day and load it with .357 Magnum rounds for self defense.

Ruger makes excellent revolvers but personally, I am partial to Smith & Wesson revolvers.
 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: huberm
I am interested in getting a new handgun, but not sure what to look for. I know I want a Ruger, but thats all I've concluded so far.

I want it to be fairly light, and comfortable while concealing (I plan to carry it sometimes once I get my permit). I also have fairly large hands, so it can't feel too small. As far as bullet size, I just want something that will effectively stop someone from harming me if I shoot them.

Oh, and I'm left handed, if that makes any difference. Any recommendations?

Is this your first handgun? If so, I recommend a .357 Magnum revolver. You can shoot .38 Special through it all day and load it with .357 Magnum rounds for self defense.

Ruger makes excellent revolvers but personally, I am partial to Smith & Wesson revolvers.

Excellent gun. My friend has a S&W .357 Magnum Revolver that's ported and it kicks ass. ALthough I'm not sure if a magnum revolver is necessarily the best choice for a first handgun. They have a kick to them.
 

dnuggett

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2003
6,703
0
76
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: pontifex


guess i should have used the :roll: emoticon after that.

i was making fun of you saying that a .45 is better because you heard stories that people lived through being hsot multiple times with a 9mm.

like the other guy said, it matters where you shoot, not the caliber size.

That plays a huge part in it. I still stand by the fact that there have been many more cases where people simply won't go down with a 9mm shot to the chest. This happens less often with a .45.

http://www.handloads.com/misc/stoppingpower.asp?Caliber=0

As you can see, the .45s have proven to be more effective at stopping their target.



Unless you can say where those shots were placed you are standing by worthless data.
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Originally posted by: dnuggett
side note- it always cracks me up when you people talk about the effectiveness of one caliber over another, like any of you truly know what you are talking about besides what you read after some jello test was conducted. The 9mm round is a great round, and if any of you think it won't stop someone, take a well placed one for the team. Let's see if you can post the results.

BTW... getting shot in the chest is not always a game over event no matter if it's a .357, 9mm, .357 SIG, .40, .45 or anything else. There is a lot tissue mass and bone in the chest, and unless you tag a vital organ AND damage that organ it may not be game over.

See my post in the "Are you prepared to shoot an intruder" thread. One shot to the chest with a 9mm took him down, and was not lethal.
 

dnuggett

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2003
6,703
0
76
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: huberm
I am interested in getting a new handgun, but not sure what to look for. I know I want a Ruger, but thats all I've concluded so far.

I want it to be fairly light, and comfortable while concealing (I plan to carry it sometimes once I get my permit). I also have fairly large hands, so it can't feel too small. As far as bullet size, I just want something that will effectively stop someone from harming me if I shoot them.

Oh, and I'm left handed, if that makes any difference. Any recommendations?

Is this your first handgun? If so, I recommend a .357 Magnum revolver. You can shoot .38 Special through it all day and load it with .357 Magnum rounds for self defense.

Ruger makes excellent revolvers but personally, I am partial to Smith & Wesson revolvers.

Excellent gun. My friend has a S&W .357 Magnum Revolver that's ported and it kicks ass. ALthough I'm not sure if a magnum revolver is necessarily the best choice for a first handgun. They have a kick to them.



Do you not know about .38 Specials?

 

BlancoNino

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2005
5,695
0
0
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: dnuggett
side note- it always cracks me up when you people talk about the effectiveness of one caliber over another, like any of you truly know what you are talking about besides what you read after some jello test was conducted. The 9mm round is a great round, and if any of you think it won't stop someone, take a well placed one for the team. Let's see if you can post the results.

BTW... getting shot in the chest is not always a game over event no matter if it's a .357, 9mm, .357 SIG, .40, .45 or anything else. There is a lot tissue mass and bone in the chest, and unless you tag a vital organ AND damage that organ it may not be game over.

See my post in the "Are you prepared to shoot an intruder" thread. One shot to the chest with a 9mm took him down, and was not lethal.

I'll bet the .45 would have killed him. It's better to have them dead, or you may get sued or they might get back up.
 

dnuggett

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2003
6,703
0
76
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: dnuggett
side note- it always cracks me up when you people talk about the effectiveness of one caliber over another, like any of you truly know what you are talking about besides what you read after some jello test was conducted. The 9mm round is a great round, and if any of you think it won't stop someone, take a well placed one for the team. Let's see if you can post the results.

BTW... getting shot in the chest is not always a game over event no matter if it's a .357, 9mm, .357 SIG, .40, .45 or anything else. There is a lot tissue mass and bone in the chest, and unless you tag a vital organ AND damage that organ it may not be game over.

See my post in the "Are you prepared to shoot an intruder" thread. One shot to the chest with a 9mm took him down, and was not lethal.



No need for me to see your post. You just echoed my last two sentences.