- Aug 25, 2001
- 56,583
- 10,224
- 126
friend 1 lives in a house. Said house used to have a dog months ago, that may have had fleas. Humans living in house at the time were not getting bitten.
Friend 2, stayed over through the summer at friend 1's place. friend 2 brought his cat, no flea collar or flea shampoo. Claims cat had no fleas, which is debatable given owner's reticence to use a flea collar. friend 2, let cat outside on porch several times while staying at friend 1's place.
At conclusion of summer, friend 2 left and went back home. friend 2 claims that friend 1's place gave his cat fleas.
friend 1 was now getting bitten by fleas at the end of summer. friend 1 claims that friend 2, by bring over cat and not having flea collar and allowing cat outside, that the cat brought fleas into friend 1's place.
friend 1 bought a couple of rounds of "bug bombs" for multiple rooms, and was out a considerable expense.
friend 1 explained that he spoke with someone, and that flea infestations need a "host".
friend 2 wants to sue friend 1, for giving his cat fleas.
Whom is correct?
Friend 2, stayed over through the summer at friend 1's place. friend 2 brought his cat, no flea collar or flea shampoo. Claims cat had no fleas, which is debatable given owner's reticence to use a flea collar. friend 2, let cat outside on porch several times while staying at friend 1's place.
At conclusion of summer, friend 2 left and went back home. friend 2 claims that friend 1's place gave his cat fleas.
friend 1 was now getting bitten by fleas at the end of summer. friend 1 claims that friend 2, by bring over cat and not having flea collar and allowing cat outside, that the cat brought fleas into friend 1's place.
friend 1 bought a couple of rounds of "bug bombs" for multiple rooms, and was out a considerable expense.
friend 1 explained that he spoke with someone, and that flea infestations need a "host".
friend 2 wants to sue friend 1, for giving his cat fleas.
Whom is correct?