Originally posted by: BigJ2078
Thats the same as me saying that the amount of people who are pro-war that have half a clue what they're talking about is much higher than those jumping on the "its cool to protest" bandwagon. Bunch of bullsh!t either way.
The main reason why people are having problems with this is most likely due to the fact it is:
1) affecting people who have nothing to do with the war and could be anti-war themselves
2) putting countless lives in danger if God forbid that there was a fire or some other emergency that necessitated going through that street
3) The countless number of situations that could've resulted from the protests, including someone getting run over and/or severely injured
4) This is no longer innocent protesting, it is now grounds for criminal persecution
1) If you supported the protestors and believed in civil disobediance as a way of disrupting such things as financial centers, yet couldn't actively become involved for whatever reason, i think the fact that your ability to get to work was disrupted would actually be welcomed.
2) That is a good point, and there are allways considerations like that to take into account, however, if you truly believed that what was happening in Iraq was wrong, more harm would be done there than could possibly be done by blocking the streets, especially because the areas that are targeted for blocking are usually not heavily residential.
3) I think that is just a restated number 2, but if for example a protestor was hurt i think they would say that they had realised that there was a chance that they could be injured but they went anyway. It is allways neccesary to way the pros and cons of any action you may take.
4) I don't know that the way you put your ideas into point form was all that coherant because usually numbered points are reserved for a list of similiar items, your last numbered point is merely a conclusion drawn from the previous point hence it could be argued that it should have been stated outside of those points. But then with the combined 2nd and 3rd points you would have been left really with only two points, much less impressive. But that is rather pedantic.