Originally posted by: user1234
I meant that a sentence like "... I do not like the Hard Drive setup..." without any reason or explanation is worthless because all it tells us that you don't like it, but all we want to hear are substantail arguments to back up your opinion. I guess saying "...just makes it a pain" is a little better, but still way to vague to help anyone understand exactly what's the disadvantage that you're complaining about.
btw, many new case models share this drive cage design and as I said, it is almost unanimously considered a positive (excluding you, whatever kind of "professional" you might be). For example, here's a review from
overclockercafe.com of the X-alien case, which shares this design:
"Now here is something I really like. A side loading drive rack. This works by securing your drive (with screws) to one of the removable tooless drawers. These drawers are loosened and removed just as the 5.25" drive bays are. The side mounting orientation gets high marks in my book because it helps to keep cable clutter to a minimum."
Here's anothere review of the Sonata from
Silent PC review (SPCR), which states: "Not only does it make more efficient use of space, this novel orientation improves installation and removal of the drives -- so much that it feels like a revelation. To install, screw metal rail to drive, slide rail into place till locked, then insert power and data cables. To remove, reverse the process."
And so it goes on and on. You need to understand that the drive rails with the rubber grommets can only effectively exist in a sideways orientation, because otherwise you'd need to take out the whole motherboard every time you install ot take out a hard drive (this is a pain even if you have a case with silding motherboard tray).
Tom's hardware agrees with that as well.
I guess if you rarely upgrade your system then it wouldn't matter, but otherwise it makes it easier to upgrade even other things like video cards, because the hard disks and their cables don't get in the way.
[conehead pwned^2]
Just let the people go, let them say what they want about the dang case, yes being more descriptive about what problems they have with the product would be a lot more helpful, but at least saying they don't like it may convince other potential buyers to look into it further to make sure they can deal with whatever the complaint is.
First off I would like to say that I like the idea of the sideways mounted drive cages, but I have yet to actually have a case with them like that. But I do see where these guys are coming from, that orientation can be a bit of a pain I am sure.
Secondly, when you started quoting reviews I was really hoping you wouldn't quote SPCR, but unfortunatel yuo did, which is fine, but you only took what pointed in your direction. According to the review of the antec BQE case with the same sideways mounted drives, here is what they had to say. And I think but am not totally sure, but I think 2 differant people reviewed these cases.
"DRIVE CAGE QUIBBLES
I have two quibbles about this "sideways" drive cage:
The way it's attached to the right side case wall doesn't leave much room for clean routing of flat ribbon IDE cables. There are only two slots available to run your wiring through and if they don't happen to line up (like they didn't on the board I used, which has it's IDE and floppy connectors in a very common location) you'll need to do some fancy cablegami in order to feed the cable through the slots in the drive cage. Not a big quibble."
"My second gripe is reduced ventilation for the hard drives that seems to be caused mostly by this sideways drive cage, a significant flaw in an otherwise well designed case. The drive cage has only four 5/8" x 4" slots in it for air to flow through. This is a similar situation to the drive cage in the Sonata.
With both sideways and normal mounting cages, the space between the drives remains about the same, so the same amount of air is flowing over and under them. However, with the sideways mounting cage, a strip of the metal cage blocks any direct air to the side edge of the drives. With a normal mounting cage, the front edge gets the cooling benefit of direct airflow hitting it. This does cause a significant drive temperature difference.
When I intially setup the 3700BQE I noticed my HDD temps were somewhat higher than I'm used to seeing and I suspected that the more restrictive HDD mounting cage was contributing to this. So I did an experiment: I set up the 3700BQE with the identical hardware configuration that was running in my 3700AMB, the only difference being the mounting of the HDD in the cage. The 3700AMB had the 80GB Seagate Barracuda IV mounted in the middle of the drive cage. Being a standard cage, it is completely open on both ends. The 3700BQE had the same Barracuda IV mounted in the second-from-the-top drive cage.
The systems consisted of:
Intel P4-2.4C with Thermalright SLK900U + 92mm Panaflo L1BX at 1500rpm.
Intel 875PBZ mobo.
2 x 512MB Mushkin PC3200 Level II RAM @ 2-3-3-6.
80GB Seagate Barracuda IV (same drive switched between the 2 systems)
ATI Radeon 7500.
Plextor Premiun 52x CDrw.
Sony FDD.
Seasonic Super Silencer 400.
120mm Panaflo FBK12G12L @ 5V as back panel case fan.
When I ran my temperature tests (75°F ambient, system idling for one hour to stabilize temps, then the system was fully loaded by running 2 instances of Prime95 for one hour to stabilize temps), in the 3700BQE, the drive consistently ran 4-5°C hotter than in the 3700AMB.
I then installed a 5 volt 92mm Panaflo L1A fan on the front of the case, a setup that's very effective for cooling HDDs without adding extra noise. I've been running my SLK3700AMB this way and find that it lowers my HDD temperatures by around 6-8°C compared to running with only passive airflow through the drive cage. The front fan did improve drive temp in the 3700BQE, too, but to a lesser degree than in the 3700AMB. With the front fan going at 5V, the drive temp in the 3700BQE was only a degree or two better than in the original 3700 without any front fan. All this, despite the much more open fan grill of the 3700BQE.
I can only blame the higher drive temps on the sideway HDD mounting in the 3700BQE, as everything else between the two systems was identical. The case and CPU temperatures at idle and load were the same in both cases; it was only the HDD temperature that was higher. "
Again those quibbles aren't major, but they can be more then enough reason for someone not to like this case. So leave these guys alone.
And to the people complaining about the case or any product, be more descriptive to what exactly you don't like about the product, that way others can see if that will be a problem for them as well.