Oh that's nice, putting down those with different view from you with name calling eh? Why, afraid that you cannot win a civil debate if you were on an even playground?
I won't stoop to your level and instead I will give you some factual number. In the US, 3 per 100 children born were adopted, I would venture to guess those adopted by gay couple is much less than that figure. And I don't care how you criticize the traditional marriage, I would bet that more than 90% of people posting on this board was born from a traditional marriage. So before you attack traditional marriage to justify your view, think about where you would have been if traditional marraige didn't exist.
I am more than willing to accept your view if you can give me factual figures on how gay marriage contribute to society the same way traditional marriages do. Let's say show me equal or higher percent of gay couples adopt children compare to traditional couples given birth. Show me equal or higher percent gay couples stay together for the long haul compare to traditional traditional couples do and I will agree they deserve the same privilage society gives to traditional couples for taking the responsibility to care for the next generation and the spouse.
My dear Sir, I can show you nothing. You are a bigot. You have been shown over and over but you can't see it. That's what bigots do, what defines them.
In this case you are stuck with the bigoted notion that marriage has to serve a purpose in order to derive benefit. You hold that as a core belief. It is absurd but you can't be made to see why. Rights are rights but that the meaning and implications of that can't penetrate your head. You are guarded from the facts by bigotry. You will see a religious bigot for what he is because you are not a religious bigot. You have a different kind. The arguments you make, while cogent to you are completely out to lunch.