- Apr 10, 2000
- 19,579
- 17
- 81
So here's my current situation
My current home, I have about 45% equity in (I'm probably using the term wrong but I owe about 55% of the homes value still). I spoke with an agent and I plan on putting my house on the market in a few days or so.
We have a home in mind that we'd like to make an offer on.
I spoke with the seller's agent and he said he can put in an offer with a contingency that I sell my house first. My concern with going this way is how much of a colossal pain in the ass it'll be if I get a contract for my house and the seller of the new house backs out for whatever reason (she's a little wonky).
So my goal is to purchase the new home and then sell my old home. I plan on putting about $120k down so that my new mortgage amount would be the same as my current one. I ran the following scenarios by a Citi Mortgage rep (who I have my current mortgage with):
Any other ideas that I'm not thinking of?
CLIFFS:
EDIT 12/3/2013:
So looks like I'll be going with option #3. The citi mortgage rep either lied to me or gave me wrong information since it apparently wouldn't be considered an investment property. The one broker I was speaking with told me that when I was ready to remove my dad from the mortgage, I'd basically have to refi. Given that, I started looking at rates and I was offered a rate of 2.875% if I get a 5/1 ARM 30 year mortgage. Normally I'd avoid ARM loans like the plague but I figured if I have to refi anyways, might as well take advantage of the lower rate as long as I can. Good/bad/stupid idea?
My current home, I have about 45% equity in (I'm probably using the term wrong but I owe about 55% of the homes value still). I spoke with an agent and I plan on putting my house on the market in a few days or so.
We have a home in mind that we'd like to make an offer on.
I spoke with the seller's agent and he said he can put in an offer with a contingency that I sell my house first. My concern with going this way is how much of a colossal pain in the ass it'll be if I get a contract for my house and the seller of the new house backs out for whatever reason (she's a little wonky).
So my goal is to purchase the new home and then sell my old home. I plan on putting about $120k down so that my new mortgage amount would be the same as my current one. I ran the following scenarios by a Citi Mortgage rep (who I have my current mortgage with):
- Use the equity that I have in my current home to use as the down payment for the new home. Was told that it can't be done (which I expected as much)
- My father said he can purchase the home in his name and get an assumable loan (he'd basically be "loaning" me the down payment). I'd be the one making the mortgage payments and once I sold my house, I'd assume the loan. The rep told me that it's hard to make an assumable loan plus it'd be considered an investment property since my dad wouldn't be the one living in the house
- My father would apply for the loan along with me and once I'm all set, he'd remove himself from the loan. The rep told me that it'd be considered an investment property and I'd end up with a much higher rate (though I'd be on the loan and this would be my primary residence).
- Worse comes to worse, the citi rep said I'd qualify for both mortgages and my dad could gift me the down payment ($120k). The problem with this is the tax implications it would have since I think the IRS limits gifts to $14k per person so I'd only be able to get a total of $56k ($14k to me and the wife from my dad and $14k each from my mom)
- Dad could loan me the money but since it's a large amount, he'd have to charge me interest which I couldn't figure out what the going rate is. Again, the govt trying to take money they have no right to :/
Any other ideas that I'm not thinking of?
CLIFFS:
- want to purchase new home before selling mine
- need to finance new home
- can't figure out how to do so without getting screwed.
EDIT 12/3/2013:
So looks like I'll be going with option #3. The citi mortgage rep either lied to me or gave me wrong information since it apparently wouldn't be considered an investment property. The one broker I was speaking with told me that when I was ready to remove my dad from the mortgage, I'd basically have to refi. Given that, I started looking at rates and I was offered a rate of 2.875% if I get a 5/1 ARM 30 year mortgage. Normally I'd avoid ARM loans like the plague but I figured if I have to refi anyways, might as well take advantage of the lower rate as long as I can. Good/bad/stupid idea?
Last edited:
