Another hero for those who empathize with Roman Polanski

[gingermeggs]

He should have his kiddy lovin' ass pimped out in the federal pen'
that's hard labor!
trynah squeeze a cheese stix shit,
after havin' ya arse fully schucked,
by some ass, pounding lifer'
Shake n bake, bitch!

 

[kylebisme]

Originally posted by: Dari
There has been a lot of pro-pedophilia expressions lately... people that support Roman Polanski fleeing from justice.

You're conflating Polansiki's crime of pedophilia with that of his fleeing, and also conflicting law with justice, which leaves you with distorted perspective of those who don't engage in such conflation, and a false sense of superiority to us.

 

[JKing106]

Where's the outrage for Rush Limbaugh going to the Dominican Republic with a shitload of Viagra to fuck little brown boys?

 

[BeauJangles]

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: DucatiMonster696
I guess a guy who only occasionally has sex with kids is not a pedophile in your book but he is in others peoples view.

Pedophilia is a sexual attraction to physically immature boys or girls. Please note Lack of Secondary Sexual Characteristics. Sex with a physically developed underage female may be abominable, especially given the age difference and power disparity between Roman Polanski and his victim, but it is not pedophilia.

Rapist? Yes. Statutory rapist? Yes. Creep? Yes.

Pedophile? No.

Not according to, you know, the people that define mental disorders:

The APA's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition, Text Revision gives the following as its "Diagnostic criteria for 302.2 Pedophilia":[23][24]

* A. Over a period of at least six months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years or younger);
* B. The person has acted on these sexual urges, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty;
* C. The person is at least age 16 years and at least five years older than the child or children in Criterion A.

 

[CallMeJoe]

Originally posted by: BeauJangles

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: DucatiMonster696
I guess a guy who only occasionally has sex with kids is not a pedophile in your book but he is in others peoples view.

Pedophilia is a sexual attraction to physically immature boys or girls. Please note Lack of Secondary Sexual Characteristics. Sex with a physically developed underage female may be abominable, especially given the age difference and power disparity between Roman Polanski and his victim, but it is not pedophilia.
Rapist? Yes. Statutory rapist? Yes. Creep? Yes.
Pedophile? No.

Not according to, you know, the people that define mental disorders:

The APA's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition, Text Revision gives the following as its "Diagnostic criteria for 302.2 Pedophilia":[23][24]
* A. Over a period of at least six months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years or younger);
* B. The person has acted on these sexual urges, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty;
* C. The person is at least age 16 years and at least five years older than the child or children in Criterion A.

Do you even read what you quote?

 

[FaaR]

Originally posted by: JKing106
Where's the outrage for Rush Limbaugh going to the Dominican Republic with a shitload of Viagra to fuck little brown boys?

I suppose that lack can be explained by wether:

* Rush actually ever travelled to the Dominican republic,
* He brought any viagra with him,
* Or had the intent to fuck any brown boys...

Seeing as you provide no evidence of these things occurring, I'm going to assume you just made the whole thing up in an effort to create forum controversy, AKA, trolling.

 

[Vette73]

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: between
"boys" is used to refer to young men, or even older gay men, in gay circles. it doesn't imply an actual, prepubescent male.
whether or not you think it is immoral or tacky to pay for sex is another issue. Personally I don't have a problem with prostitution.

M. Mitterand used the French word "garcon", which is even less age-specific than the English "boy".

"Garçon is the French word for boy."

Etymology: French, boy, servant, from Old French
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/garcon

 

[bl4ckfl4g]

Originally posted by: shira

Originally posted by: Dari
There has been a lot of pro-pedophilia expressions lately. First we had pedo-bear now we have people that support Roman Polanski fleeing from justice. G-d willing, these people will be chased by bullets or just tortured to death.

So, the correct response to SPEECH you dislike is torture and murder.

The irony of your outrage escapes you.

I agree with Dari.

 

[shira]

Originally posted by: bl4ckfl4g

Originally posted by: shira

Originally posted by: Dari
There has been a lot of pro-pedophilia expressions lately. First we had pedo-bear now we have people that support Roman Polanski fleeing from justice. G-d willing, these people will be chased by bullets or just tortured to death.

So, the correct response to SPEECH you dislike is torture and murder.

The irony of your outrage escapes you.

I agree with Dari.

There are supporters of Polanski in this country; will you track them down, then chase them with bullets or torture them to death?

Why not?

 

[CallMeJoe]

Originally posted by: Marlin1975

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: between
"boys" is used to refer to young men, or even older gay men, in gay circles. it doesn't imply an actual, prepubescent male.
whether or not you think it is immoral or tacky to pay for sex is another issue. Personally I don't have a problem with prostitution.

M. Mitterand used the French word "garcon", which is even less age-specific than the English "boy".

"Garçon is the French word for boy."
Etymology: French, boy, servant, from Old French
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/garcon

Please read what you quote. Garcon is also commonly used in reference to any adult male in a service capacity.

 

[CallMeJoe]

Originally posted by: FaaR

Originally posted by: JKing106
Where's the outrage for Rush Limbaugh going to the Dominican Republic with a shitload of Viagra to fuck little brown boys?

I suppose that lack can be explained by wether:
* Rush actually ever travelled to the Dominican republic,
* He brought any viagra with him,
* Or had the intent to fuck any brown boys...
Seeing as you provide no evidence of these things occurring, I'm going to assume you just made the whole thing up in an effort to create forum controversy, AKA, trolling.

As Meat Loaf once sang, "two out of three ain't bad..."

 

[Vette73]

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: Marlin1975

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: between
"boys" is used to refer to young men, or even older gay men, in gay circles. it doesn't imply an actual, prepubescent male.
whether or not you think it is immoral or tacky to pay for sex is another issue. Personally I don't have a problem with prostitution.

M. Mitterand used the French word "garcon", which is even less age-specific than the English "boy".

"Garçon is the French word for boy."
Etymology: French, boy, servant, from Old French
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/garcon

Please read what you quote. Garcon is also commonly used in reference to any adult male in a service capacity.

No the english made it referance that, not the french.

Garçon is the French word for boy. In English, and various other languages, it was adopted in the specific meaning of a (male, usually young) waiter, especially of low rank in a larger establishment, who serves customers food and/or drinks. However, in France, it is considered rude to address a waiter as garçon. It is instead recommended to call them monsieur or mademoiselle, depending on their gender.

Garcon = Boy

 

[alchemize]

Originally posted by: JKing106
Where's the outrage for Rush Limbaugh going to the Dominican Republic with a shitload of Viagra to fuck little brown boys?

I'm as outraged about that as I am your serial raping of foster kids.

 

[DucatiMonster696]

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: BeauJangles

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: DucatiMonster696
I guess a guy who only occasionally has sex with kids is not a pedophile in your book but he is in others peoples view.

Pedophilia is a sexual attraction to physically immature boys or girls. Please note Lack of Secondary Sexual Characteristics. Sex with a physically developed underage female may be abominable, especially given the age difference and power disparity between Roman Polanski and his victim, but it is not pedophilia.
Rapist? Yes. Statutory rapist? Yes. Creep? Yes.
Pedophile? No.

Not according to, you know, the people that define mental disorders:

The APA's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition, Text Revision gives the following as its "Diagnostic criteria for 302.2 Pedophilia":[23][24]
* A. Over a period of at least six months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years or younger);
* B. The person has acted on these sexual urges, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty;
* C. The person is at least age 16 years and at least five years older than the child or children in Criterion A.

Do you even read what you quote?

Did you not read the age part? What age was the victim?

 

[CallMeJoe]

Originally posted by: DucatiMonster696
Did you not read the age part? What age was the victim?

"Generally age 13 years or longer" gives an approximate age range for the specified characteristic prepubescent.
Read that one more time: PREPUBESCENT, as in not yet having reached puberty.

Are you really this dim, or do you use P&N to supplement your remedial English class?

 

[CallMeJoe]

Originally posted by: Marlin1975
No the english made it referance that, not the french.
Garçon is the French word for boy. In English, and various other languages, it was adopted in the specific meaning of a (male, usually young) waiter, especially of low rank in a larger establishment, who serves customers food and/or drinks. However, in France, it is considered rude to address a waiter as garçon. It is instead recommended to call them monsieur or mademoiselle, depending on their gender.
Garcon = Boy

You may be correct as to current usage; I've not been to France since the '60s. At that time, garcon was in common usage for waiters, bellhops and the like.

FWIW, I did learn French in England, which may have influenced my interpretation.

 

[CanOWorms]

This is just the typical European attitude to non-Europeans that developed from their colonialism activities. They just don't think that rape against a non-European can even be considered since only Europeans are humans in their view.

 

[JKing106]

Originally posted by: FaaR

Originally posted by: JKing106
Where's the outrage for Rush Limbaugh going to the Dominican Republic with a shitload of Viagra to fuck little brown boys?

I suppose that lack can be explained by wether:

* Rush actually ever travelled to the Dominican republic,
* He brought any viagra with him,
* Or had the intent to fuck any brown boys...

Seeing as you provide no evidence of these things occurring, I'm going to assume you just made the whole thing up in an effort to create forum controversy, AKA, trolling.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0706062rush1.html


JULY 6--Rush Limbaugh was traveling with four other men--including the producers of the hit show "24"--when he was detained over a mislabeled bottle of Viagra found in his luggage during a Customs search. A Department of Homeland security passenger manifest shows that Limbaugh and his four buddies flew from the Dominican Republic on a Gulfstream IV jet owned by Premiere Radio Networks, which syndicates his radio program. Limbaugh returned to Palm Beach, Florida on June 26 with Joel Surnow, "24"'s co-creator and executive producer and Howard Gordon, another of the Fox hit's executive producers (Hollywood agent Jeffrey Benson was also part of the Limbaugh quintet). With all those guys in tow, it is unclear what Limbaugh needed with those 29 100mg Viagra pills. The passenger manifest was among several documents released today by the Palm Beach County State's Attorney in response to a TSG open records request. Included in the material released were a copy of the handwritten statement Limbaugh provided investigators after he was detained upon the discovery of the impotency drug. An affidavit sworn three days later by Limbaugh was also released. In that document, Limbaugh explains that the Viagra "was intended for my exclusive use" and that the drug had been prescribed in the name of his drug treatment doctor, Steven Strumwasser, "to further maintain and protect my privacy."

The fucking little brown boys is speculation, I admit. But it's pretty obvious he's a self-loathing homosexual.

 

[JKing106]

Originally posted by: alchemize

Originally posted by: JKing106
Where's the outrage for Rush Limbaugh going to the Dominican Republic with a shitload of Viagra to fuck little brown boys?

I'm as outraged about that as I am your serial raping of foster kids.

Did you, or did you not, get caught having sex with a donkey? I know what I heard...

 

[alchemize]

Originally posted by: JKing106

Originally posted by: alchemize

Originally posted by: JKing106
Where's the outrage for Rush Limbaugh going to the Dominican Republic with a shitload of Viagra to fuck little brown boys?

I'm as outraged about that as I am your serial raping of foster kids.

Did you, or did you not, get caught having sex with a donkey? I know what I heard...

I thought that's what it was too, till she mentioned dropping you on your head as an infant 12 years ago.

 

[DucatiMonster696]

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: DucatiMonster696
Did you not read the age part? What age was the victim?

"Generally age 13 years or longer" gives an approximate age range for the specified characteristic prepubescent.
Read that one more time: PREPUBESCENT, as in not yet having reached puberty.

Are you really this dim, or do you use P&N to supplement your remedial English class?

You can ignore the complete definition and split hairs all you want to defend your hero. The guy is a fucking child raping pedophile even by the standards presented by definition.

 

[CallMeJoe]

Originally posted by: DucatiMonster696

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: DucatiMonster696
Did you not read the age part? What age was the victim?

"Generally age 13 years or longer" gives an approximate age range for the specified characteristic prepubescent.
Read that one more time: PREPUBESCENT, as in not yet having reached puberty.
Are you really this dim, or do you use P&N to supplement your remedial English class?

You can ignore the complete definition and split hairs all you want to defend your hero. The guy is a fucking child raping pedophile even by the standards presented by definition.

I'm not defending Mr. Polanski; he's a confessed rapist who should have been in jail decades ago. I'm trying to correct your abuse of the English language. Words have specific meanings, and your insistence of labeling a statutory rapist "pedophile" cheapens the term.

 

[Dari]

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: DucatiMonster696

Originally posted by: CallMeJoe

Originally posted by: DucatiMonster696
Did you not read the age part? What age was the victim?

"Generally age 13 years or longer" gives an approximate age range for the specified characteristic prepubescent.
Read that one more time: PREPUBESCENT, as in not yet having reached puberty.
Are you really this dim, or do you use P&N to supplement your remedial English class?

You can ignore the complete definition and split hairs all you want to defend your hero. The guy is a fucking child raping pedophile even by the standards presented by definition.

I'm not defending Mr. Polanski; he's a confessed rapist who should have been in jail decades ago. I'm trying to correct your abuse of the English language. Words have specific meanings, and your insistence of labeling a statutory rapist "pedophile" cheapens the term.

Words don't have specific meanings. They change over time.