• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Another ebay ripoff.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

DesiPower

Lifer
Nov 22, 2008
15,299
740
126
Another thing consider is under which category did he list it in... just saying... I still don't fell he should be jailed. Atleast here in US, the seller has no say, ebay or paypal can simply give the money back to buyer based on his "satisfaction" if ebay determined the case in buyer's favor. Ebay should have reviewed the case, determined it was wrong, taken money out of seller's account and returned to buyer, end of the story, jail time is insane, it shouldn't have happened.
 

Ricochet

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 1999
6,390
19
81
Jail time well deserve. It has been determined wrong and a willful intent to scam. I wish it was a longer sentence. As it is it's not too much of a deterrent for such behavior.
 

bradly1101

Diamond Member
May 5, 2013
4,689
294
126
www.bradlygsmith.org
I remember another ebay scam where on computer parts the ad would say, "Retail box." And that's all you got was the box. I guess they deserved to be scammed too?
 

Number1

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2006
7,881
549
126
Oh cry me a freaking river. There was no need to call me a moron, you asswipe.

I disagree, there was. People like you who think it's perfectly OK to scam people should DIA

IMG_6780Large.jpg


PS: Did I mention feet first?
 
Last edited:

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
It's clear our members want to defend their own future retardation.

His auction was crystal clear.

Even in B.C.times, Buyer Beware! was common.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
So, if the seller did not give all the info on real gold bars, would that make the seller legal?
 

88keys

Golden Member
Aug 24, 2012
1,854
12
81
I wonder how this is covered under the law. Judge Judy is entertainment and she might not actually be applying the law.

It is how the law would most likely see cases like that. And in these cases, it is the intent to deceive which is plainly obvious.