Anonymous To Release Document Proving BOA Committed Fraud on Monday?

[shabby]

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/ha...s-proving-bank-america-committed-fraud-monday
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/...ocument-Proving-BOA-Committed-Fraud-on-Monday

After Julian Assange crashed and burned in his threat to release documents that expose fraud at Bank of America, many thought he had been only bluffing, and that BofA is actually clean. Not so fast. A member of the hacker collective Anonymous, which singlehandedly destroyed "hacker defense" firm HB Gary, who goes under the handle OperationLeakS "is claiming to be have emails and documents which prove "fraud" was committed by Bank of America employees, and the group says it'll release them on Monday" reports Gawker. As to the contents of the possible disclosure: ""He Just told me he have GMAC emails showing BoA order to mix loan numbers to not match it's Documents. to foreclose on Americans.. Shame." If indeed this makes the case against BofA' foreclosure practices stronger, it certainly explains why the banking consortium is scrambling to arrange a settlement, and also why Bank of America recently split off its $2 trillion in mortgages into "good bank" and "bad bank" entities.

Anon seems fearless, looks like shit will hit the fan tomorrow, wonder how this will play out.

Updated Mar 14:
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011...nce-scheme-with-cooperation-of-servicers.html
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/op...dicating-premeditated-intent-deceive-governme

 

[JSt0rm]

Thats seriously fucked up that they would intentionally mix up the loan numbers.

 

[her209]

If true, why hasn't the DoJ gone after these guys?

 

[Londo_Jowo]

If true, why hasn't the DoJ gone after these guys?

Because the current administration is just as deeply in cahoots with the banking sector as the previous administrations have been.

 

[Phokus]

Someone please tell me why Wikileaks and their supporters like Anonymous are bad again?

 

[WHAMPOM]

The "BIG SHOTS" don't like them.

 

[Infohawk]

Someone please tell me why Wikileaks and their supporters like Anonymous are bad again?

Anonymous is just a modern day partisan vigilante. If you don't understand why vigilantism is bad just try to pretend that a group of hackers was attacking Planned Parenthood and claiming its to save the lives of unborn babies.

As for Wikileaks you just have to look at Assange's behavior in withholding certain documents as leverage. If he were a real journalist, he wouldn't withhold important information from the public out of self-interest. Also, they are just an unaccountable organization deciding what sensitive information should or should not be released.

 

[her209]

As for Wikileaks you just have to look at Assange's behavior in withholding certain documents as leverage. If he were a real journalist, he wouldn't withhold important information from the public out of self-interest. Also, they are just an unaccountable organization deciding what sensitive information should or should not be released.

News organizations do this frequently at the request of the government. See the story about the CIA agent in Pakistan.

 

[Phokus]

Anonymous is just a modern day partisan vigilante. If you don't understand why vigilantism is bad just try to pretend that a group of hackers was attacking Planned Parenthood and claiming its to save the lives of unborn babies.

As for Wikileaks you just have to look at Assange's behavior in withholding certain documents as leverage. If he were a real journalist, he wouldn't withhold important information from the public out of self-interest. Also, they are just an unaccountable organization deciding what sensitive information should or should not be released.

Is planned Parenthood witholding secret documents of wrongdoing? This analogy doesn't hold up to water.

If BOA is intentionally forging documents to fuck people over in foreclosures, then all praise Anonymous.

News organizations do this frequently at the request of the government. See the story about the CIA agent in Pakistan.

That and I remember the NYT witholding some information about secret cells or something at the request of the Bush admin.

 

[Vette73]

Anonymous is just a modern day partisan vigilante. If you don't understand why vigilantism is bad just try to pretend that a group of hackers was attacking Planned Parenthood and claiming its to save the lives of unborn babies.

As for Wikileaks you just have to look at Assange's behavior in withholding certain documents as leverage. If he were a real journalist, he wouldn't withhold important information from the public out of self-interest. Also, they are just an unaccountable organization deciding what sensitive information should or should not be released.

Last I checked abortion is legal, banking fraud not so much.

 

[Infohawk]

Is planned Parenthood witholding secret documents of wrongdoing? This analogy doesn't hold up to water.

Hold up to water? Let's cut to the point, you think ends justify the means and you support illegal action if it's aligned with your agenda. You don't really understand the rule of law. You're just a partisan hack.

 

[Infohawk]

Last I checked abortion is legal, banking fraud not so much.

And who makes the determination of legality in Anonymous? Give me a break that's like a vigilante mob claiming that their summary hanging of a suspected murderer is legit because murder is illegal.

 

[her209]

And who makes the determination of legality in Anonymous? Give me a break that's like a vigilante mob claiming that their summary hanging of a suspected murderer is legit because murder is illegal.

Is that like water boarding a suspected terrorist because terrorism is illegal?

 

[Phokus]

Hold up to water? Let's cut to the point, you think ends justify the means and you support illegal action if it's aligned with your agenda. You don't really understand the rule of law. You're just a partisan hack.

In this case it sure as hell does. We're witnessing the synergy of big corporations (especially banks) and government into an unstoppable force that's destroying America. There's very little other recourse. It doesn't surprise me that you'd support the corporatist agenda though.

Besides that, you batshit crazy rightwingers keep quoting Jefferson: "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

This way is a bit less messy than what you bathshit crazy morons propose.

 

[wuliheron]

Crazy is as crazy does.

In fact, the whole idea of crazy is against the Bible! These are demonic possessions boys and the last of days is upon us! Repent sinner before it is too late!

Or, see you local psychiatrist and then repent!

In either case the truth shall set you free and his name is Jesus Christ!

 

[Infohawk]

In this case it sure as hell does.

Then we agree. You're ready to throw away democracy and rule of law when you don't get your way.

 

[Infohawk]

Is that like water boarding a suspected terrorist because terrorism is illegal?

What is your point? Do you think I support waterboarding?

 

[Phokus]

Then we agree. You're ready to throw away democracy and rule of law when you don't get your way.

There's no such thing as democracy when you have no transparency. You prefer BOA to continue to fuck over the American people (with the government's backing). That's a helluva lot more disturbing than my position.

 

[Infohawk]

There's no such thing as democracy when you have no transparency. You prefer BOA to continue to fuck over the American people (with the government's backing). That's a helluva lot more disturbing than my position.

It's not a choice between BofA and and Wikileaks. That's a false dichotomy. Again it's like a vigilante mob saying that someone who's against them prefers that criminals not be punished for their crimes. Keep thinking in black and white though, I wouldn't expect anything different from a hardcore partisan hack.

 

[Lemon law]

If true, why hasn't the DoJ gone after these guys?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe Her209 has unwittingly put the finger on it. We have trillions and trillions of dollars in valid bank accounts in the USA and international bank accounts, yet who are the bookkeepers, who say who owns what? Its the very fraudulent bankers who are the scorekeepers.

And if we go after the same fraudulent scorekeepers, they can apply the nuclear option and says, they and not the legitimate account holder really owns all assets. the scorekeepers will lose their accounting.

You think you got a bank account, sorry Charlie, prove it?

Another in bankers we trusted, in bankers we busted.

You don't like it boys and girls, sue em , we know what they will say, you had an account, what account? We have no record of it. Its the golden rule, they that have the gold makes the rules

 

[JSt0rm]

What is your point? Do you think I support waterboarding?

Confirming infohawk is a fascist apologist for BoA

 

[Phokus]

It's not a choice between BofA and and Wikileaks. That's a false dichotomy. Again it's like a vigilante mob saying that someone who's against them prefers that criminals not be punished for their crimes. Keep thinking in black and white though, I wouldn't expect anything different from a hardcore partisan hack.

THE GOVERNMENT IS IN BED WITH THE BANKS you jackass. It's not a false dichotomy, the banks are more powerful than any other organization in the country. You implicitly support the thugs at BOA and wallstreet by being against these actions. Who's going to prosecute and investigate wrongdoing? Should we just let the legal proceeding take it's course when it's never going to start in the first place? You are such an unbelievable corporatist whore, it's mind boggling.

 

[Phokus]

Confirming infohawk is a fascist apologist for BoA

I guarantee you, Infohawk would change his tune if he was the victim of BOA's fraud, in this case.

Edit: I'm beginning to think Infohawk works at one of these parasitic institutions.

 

[Argo]

Anonymous is just a modern day partisan vigilante. If you don't understand why vigilantism is bad just try to pretend that a group of hackers was attacking Planned Parenthood and claiming its to save the lives of unborn babies.

As for Wikileaks you just have to look at Assange's behavior in withholding certain documents as leverage. If he were a real journalist, he wouldn't withhold important information from the public out of self-interest. Also, they are just an unaccountable organization deciding what sensitive information should or should not be released.

This.

 

[manimal]

Radical transparency hurts....the rats scatter and cockroaches retreat when they are subjected to direct sunlight.