Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jlee

Lifer
Sep 12, 2001
48,518
223
106
Originally posted by: tm37
Originally posted by: CadetLee
without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications..

There's my loophole.. "I didn't intend to!"
:p

And what makes it impossible to enforce.

Kind of hard to prove intent

:thumbsup::D
 

azoomee

Golden Member
Jan 5, 2002
1,054
0
0
You know, this whole website/forum could be considered annoying to someone -- what if someone visited the forum and got annoyed by people's posts....everyone has a pseudonym.

I don't get it....
 

EKKC

Diamond Member
May 31, 2005
5,895
0
0
i find this site annoying. im suing anand for half his $$$!!!

me FTW!!! :D

j/k :p
 

DaShen

Lifer
Dec 1, 2000
10,710
1
0
Hahahahaha!!!! :thumbsup:

what a moron ;)

***EDIT***
Oh crap, Am I going to jail now :confused:
 

DaShen

Lifer
Dec 1, 2000
10,710
1
0
I am placing all of you under citizens arrest. ;)

Don't try to leave the country, you're already screwed.
 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
12
81
To grease the rails for this idea, Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, and the section's other sponsors slipped it into an unrelated, must-pass bill to fund the Department of Justice. The plan: to make it politically infeasible for politicians to oppose the measure.

The tactic worked. The bill cleared the House of Representatives by voice vote, and the Senate unanimously approved it Dec. 16.

Sounds familiar to me...

SPEAKER
Then it is unanimous, we are going to approve the bill to evacuate the town of Springfield in the great state of--

CONGRESSMAN
Wait a second, I want to tack on a rider to that bill - $30 million of taxpayer money to support the perverted arts.

SPEAKER
All in favor of the amended Springfield-slash-pervert bill?

FLOOR
Boo!

SPEAKER
Bill defeated.
 

Phoenix86

Lifer
May 21, 2003
14,644
10
81
Originally posted by: tm37
Originally posted by: CadetLee
without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications..

There's my loophole.. "I didn't intend to!"
:p

And what makes it impossible to enforce.

Kind of hard to prove intent

It's done all the time in court, murder vs. manslaughter.
 

Injury

Lifer
Jul 19, 2004
13,066
2
81
They will enforce this just like they enforce spam laws and crackdown on spyware and malware.

Might as well just leave this bill out for toilet paper.
 

hypn0tik

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2005
5,866
2
0
Originally posted by: C6FT7
There's a company out in CA that makes video chips and system chipsets that the Bush administration has hired to nForce the rules. :p

*Rimshot*
 

DAGTA

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
8,172
1
0
Gotta love that a group of people with the average computer literacy less than a 7 year old are writing and passing bills pertaining to computer use.
 

AMDZen

Lifer
Apr 15, 2004
12,589
0
76
By simply posting this news article, you have annoyed me extremely. I'm calling the police.

This rates as the all time dumbest law I've seen in my life time.
 

DAGTA

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
8,172
1
0
I think a friend of mine hit the bulls-eye with this comment:

"it all goes back to the "feeling" someone has... like in sexual
harassment. If you feel harassed, you are. If you feel annoyed,
someone is doing it to you.

No personal responsibility at all, but a logical consequence of where
we have been heading for the last 40 years."
 

Arkitech

Diamond Member
Apr 13, 2000
8,356
4
76
hmm lets see, thousands of displaced americans from hurricanes, us troops are dying overseas, white house personnel endangering fbi operatives, george bush passes a bill against neffing

wow