Angelina Jolie or Kim Kardashian?

[dfuze]

I would have to go with Kim

 

[edro]

Kim

If you want a tall thin / short curvy debate, you could have picked better examples.
Your comparison throws it off because Angelina is old, bony and pale now.

 

[zinfamous]

this.

not even sure why this question has to be asked. jolie used to be hot but she is bony as shit now and just looks unhealthy.

People care less that Kim is getting fatter and fatter?

I do agree, though, that after her appearance at the Oscars, and seeing how thin she has become, she's been knocked way down that hotness scale.

I'd probably put Kim over her, but for me, her personality and that elephant ass still contribute to her looks.

 

[Sunburn74]

Kim is hotter.

Angelina would be better in bed (I've heard about the stuff she's into)

 

[uclaLabrat]

They're both dumpster fires. I wouldn't fuck them with Hal's dick.

 

[darkewaffle]

People care less that Kim is getting fatter and fatter?

She's getting fatter than not fat at all? Goddamnit!

 

[Krazy4Real]

Neither... but Jolie like 10 years ago? Hell yeah. Too bad she's all skin and bones now.

 

[CraigRT]

I'm not batshit crazy about either.
Probably a slight win for Kim.

 

[Atomic Playboy]

Based solely around body type, Kim Kardashian. I've never been hot on skinny women, and Jolie has gotten way too skinny.

 

[peonyu]

I would take Britney Spears when she was 20'ish over both of them.

 

[QueBert]

Hum...

Congratulation, you found a semi-unflattering picture of a person.

 

[peonyu]

Congratulation, you found a semi-unflattering picture of a person.

And you found a airbrushed picture of a person who is dolled up to look good by a staff of 20+ people. Makeup and a crew of people who dedicate themselves to making sure other people look good can turn a ugly duck like Kim K into a decent looking duck any day of the week.

 

[QueBert]

And you found a airbrushed picture of a person who is dolled up to look good by a staff of 20+ people. Makeup and a crew of people who dedicate themselves to making sure other people look good can turn a ugly duck like Kim K into a decent looking duck any day of the week.

Ummm, relax it's a picture of her taken by a paparazzi with no airbrushing. She doesn't even have on lip gloss. I've seen Kim in person, and I've seen pictures of her without makeup, she looks better naturally. She doesn't even need makeup imho. Nice tirade though.

and to everyone calling her fat, this pic is from like 2 weeks ago

If this is fat, I wish my GF was fat 🙁

 

[zokudu]

This thread needs more of Angelina Jolies Right Leg

 

[Dr. Zaus]

Congratulation, you found a semi-unflattering picture of a person.

Seriously? I thought she looked a lot better with her natural skin blotches.

I guess I"m not into plastic people 🙁

 

[Perknose]

Kim K. is a vacuous, no-talent pig, inside and out.

Angelina is creepy scary . . . deeply so.

That said, both can and have looked quite doable at their respective physical peaks.

But Piggy Kim is one month away from the media cameras from bloating up like the Pillsbury dough boy in a hot oven.

 

[tboo]

Its amazing how much Angelina has changed since her Lara Croft days.

 

[Keeper]

Anymore Jolie looks like Skeletor, so I'd have to pick Kardashian. She's pretty high on my list anyway. Mid 1990's Jolie on the other hand...

THIS, plus one. I'd even stretch it to early "00's" fo AJ. the last 5 years, a little like that pic above.......

 

[JulesMaximus]

Kim

And this thread needs moar pole!

 

[Joseph F]

this.

not even sure why this question has to be asked. jolie used to be hot but she is bony as shit now and just looks unhealthy.

Yeah, If this was five years ago, I would have cast my vote for Jolie, but she's too bony now.

 

[Saint Nick]

Kim

And this thread needs moar pole!

It's got plenty of pole, but all the wrong kind.

 

[KeithTalent]

I really have no idea what Kim Kardashian looks like, so I will take Angelina.

KT

 

[Rudee]

Kim Kardashian's ass is kind of sexy now, because she's relatively young. But in another 10 years from now, it's going to be disgustingly huge. As she ages and her metabolism slows down and her hormones go out of whack like they do for most woman who hit their 40s', that ass is going to get bigger and bigger and bigger. And it's going to sag like a bean-bag chair.

I know this because I'm in my 40's now, and most all the hot girls that I went to high school with that had sexy booty going on, now, some 25 years later, those same girls have absolutely enormous asses and it's absolutely disgusting. I've yet to see an ass get smaller as a woman ages, it only gets larger and larger.

 

[GundamW]

Specifically, if you took their faces off their bodies, what body type is more attrative to men? Angelina Jolie or Kim Kardashian.

Like most posters, after looking at Jolie's Oscar photos, I will have to pick Kim.

Is Jolie really on a diet or is she getting thin for a role? Like Bale/Machinist.

 

[hdeck]

Angelina back in the day was better, but based on today there is no question Kim is more attractive.