QueBert
Lifer
- Jan 6, 2002
- 22,976
- 1,178
- 126
A new phone -especially a model that's not even out yet- is one thing.
My point is anyone whining they don't have ICS on their current year old phone so it can have WTF 'facial unlock' or whatever else they likely never even heard of is what I find funny.
If I'm in a 2 year contract, it's reasonable imho for me to think I should get updates to the OS for those 2 years. Especially when my phones plenty powerful enough to run them. Do I care about facial unlock? not a bit, but there are things in ICS I would like without having to installed a hacked rom. A phone that's a year old really isn't old in my eyes. There are people still in a contract who have a phone that ICS won't be released for. And they'll RUN out and buy a new phone when ICS hits the market so they can get facial unlock. It's sad Google doesn't force HTC/Samsung/Moto to provide updates to their customers. Should a 1.6 device get ICS? hell no, but something that shipped with 2.1 or 2.2 should. If I listen to HTC & Google my Evo 4G's ancient and needs to be upgraded.
People talk about how evil and money grubby Apple is but their phones get updates far longer than Android handsets. And ICS will have a lot more than 'facial unlock' as you put it. But I'll never know unless I decide to hack ICS on my phone. Somehow in the eyes of a Fandroid dude that's a plus though "it's open! you can do what you want! r0x0rs my b0x0rs!" Only online would having to hack something to an update be better than a simple OTA. But again since you think ICS is lame I'm sure you think people who expect their 12 month old phone to get it who won't as lame too.
Last edited: