And this happens when we have a idiot for the president...

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
M

mztykal

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2000
6,708
48
91
Since you're all so high-strung and opinionated all of a sudden. I've decided that whoever can come up with the best argument as to why this happened and why Bush is not a idiot will win a prize.

I suddenly find this topic of interest. So off we go to read replies. :D

Flames count too.

Have you no respect or reverence for the sanctity of human life? People are dead, and you want to take this time to flame President Bush. Take your flamebait elsewhere if this is the kind of contributions you would care to make. This is your FINAL warning. Don't test me today.

AnandTech Moderator
 
S

Static911

Diamond Member
Nov 24, 2000
4,338
1
0
lol ...blame bush? wow, then in that case, i blame FAA for not stopping the hijacking in the first place

static911
 
rudder

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
mzytykal, go back to playing fvcking video games loser. You know nothing of world politics. Who do you think was in the damn White House for 8 years ignoring all this shi!t.
 
M

mryellow2

Golden Member
Dec 2, 2000
1,057
0
0
God not another flame war, have some respect for all the people who have fallen. This is not a time to be arguing amongst ourselves.
 
J

Jzero

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
18,834
1
0
The US foreign policy that precipitated this incident has been developing and evolving for YEARS! You can't blame Bush. I don't like the guy, but pinning the blame on him is pretty pointless. He hasn't even been president long enough to have been singlehandedly responsible for this...
geez...
 
M

mztykal

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2000
6,708
48
91
<< mzytykal, go back to playing fvcking video games loser >>

I mean you can say what you want. But if they strategically planned this for awhile, why unleash it now? Why?

You mean to say they weren't sure and were waiting for the hell of it? Come on now. They saw a opening and struck.
 
L

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
I can't really believe all the idiocy this event has brought out.

How the hell could this be Bush's fault?

 
M

mztykal

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2000
6,708
48
91
Come on people relax. We aren't here to aruge, because arguing on the internet is like the special olympics. Even though you win, you're still retarded at the end. :D

So flame me all you want. I'm just saying, there was a opening, they took it, plain and simple.

The blaming Bush thing was a give-in. :D
 
L

Looney

Lifer
Jun 13, 2000
21,938
5
0
I mean you can say what you want. But if they strategically planned this for awhile, why unleash it now? Why?

You mean to say they weren't sure and were waiting for the hell of it? Come on now. They saw a opening and struck.

You're a moron. Do you really think they would sit on this plan for such a long period to wait for a 'good opening'? The longer they waited, the better chance the attack would have been discovered. They did this as soon as it was possible, and today just happened to be it.

 
C

Crimson

Banned
Oct 11, 1999
3,809
0
0
Don't blame this on Bush you idiot.. You can blame it on the failed security plans of administrations past if you want, but Bush obviously could not have prevented this.. Stop trying to start a political flame war in the middle of a national tragedy... Personally I think Bush will respond with MUCH more severe punishment that Clinton would have.. so I don't think your argument holds any water anyway.
 
G

gittyup

Diamond Member
Nov 7, 2000
5,036
0
0
Also, one of Bin Laden's associates is going on trial in Manhattan tomorrow for another bombing. Maybe that's why now. Who knows.
 
W

WhiteWonder

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2001
3,168
0
0


<< << mzytykal, go back to playing fvcking video games loser >>

I mean you can say what you want. But if they strategically planned this for awhile, why unleash it now? Why?

You mean to say they weren't sure and were waiting for the hell of it? Come on now. They saw a opening and struck. >>



there have been better openings,

clintons impeachment, the election, how was this an opening?
 
iamwiz82

iamwiz82

Lifer
Jan 10, 2001
30,772
13
81
i guess we can blame the Oklahoma bombing on Clinton, and Waco on Reno, oh wait, i already do, with Waco, at least.
 
S

Static911

Diamond Member
Nov 24, 2000
4,338
1
0
your are in college and above right? i know any engineers can understand political science if some1 explains to them: US has always been open. There is no such thing as "window of opportunity in US" cuz there is one everyday.

It wasn't like only till Bush came in then security decreased...was same yesterday, today and changing tomarrow


static911
 
L

Logix

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2001
3,627
0
0
I suppose you think Bush ordered the hijacking of those planes just so he could get more funding for the military!

[sarcasm]Gore certainly would have used his "voo-doo" powers to prevent this from happening if he were prez[/sarcasm]
 
M

MrBond

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2000
9,911
0
76


<< I mean you can say what you want. But if they strategically planned this for awhile, why unleash it now? Why? >>

Because on this day in 1978, the Camp David Peace Accords were signed. They apparently pissed off some people in the middle east enough to use this day as a symbolical date.

Bush will let the hammer fall, because he's got the cajones to. And I am thankful for that.
 
R

Rage187

Lifer
Dec 30, 2000
14,276
4
81
"Personally I think Bush will respond with MUCH more severe punishment that Clinton would have.. so I don't think your argument holds any water anyway."


Thats the truth, if Clinton/Gore were in office, the chinese would have been within our borders by now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom