And the next big thing is: Brokerage firm overcharges

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
SEC IS SAID TO EXAMINE STOCK PRICING BY BIG BROKERS /// Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating dozen brokerage firms -- including Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Ameritrade, Charles Schwab and E Trade Financial -- on suspicion they failed to secure best available price for stocks for customers... Developing...

A physician friend of mine clued me in on these practices several years ago, about time it caught up with them.

Now if lawyers would be honest about their billed hours, we might have a perfect world;)



S.E.C. Is Said to Examine Stock Pricing by Big Brokers

The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating about a dozen brokerage firms - including Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Ameritrade, Charles Schwab and E*Trade Financial - on suspicion that they failed to secure the best available price for stocks they were trading for their customers, according to people who have been briefed on the inquiry.

At issue is the way the companies executed trades of Nasdaq-listed securities when the markets opened in the morning, a period of intense trading activity resulting from the backlog of orders since the market's close the previous day.

After examining trading data from the last four years, the investigation found evidence that trades were often processed in ways that favored the firms over their clients, these people said.

Securing the best price is one of the industry's critical obligations to investors. If the investigators' suspicions are confirmed, these practices are not likely to add up to significant costs for individual investors - the difference would be pennies a share traded - but in total they could represent substantial amounts of money for the brokers.

More important, the investigation opens another possible conflict of interest involving the big firms on Wall Street. In the last few years, the financial industry has been jolted by a series of scandals over practices that rewarded company insiders at the expense of ordinary investors.
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Not surprised. They can make a nice little bit of side money for themselves by not giving them the full discounted price. So they charge you a commission, and then charge you more per share than it is worth. Heh, what took it so long to be discovered?
 

AFB

Lifer
Jan 10, 2004
10,718
3
0
There was a thing on Bloomberg about a month ago on this. Not suprised.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
For firms who act as principal to their own trades or pay market makers (like Knight Trading or LaBranche) for order flow this will probably hit them hard. Schwab has already become a victim of collateral damage for their FundSource unit when the mutual fund issue blew up about a year ago. MSDW and Merrill both have entire graveyards of skeletons in their closets and I won't be entirely sad to see them get spanked. The online players like Ameritrade and E*Trade, I have trouble seeing how deep they can be in the sh!t considering they pretty much route their orders straight-thru on SuperSOES, unless the SEC is saying they're sitting on trades or selling out of inventory at an above market price. If they were then they deserve what they get.