And the Lies Just Keep On Coming

Jan 25, 2011
17,056
9,526
146
I don't know. I have a hard time believing that was meant to deceive. Just seems like a crappy panoramic cropping to me.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Dude, they have the whole image screwed up and the lesson learned is white people? Looks like a nomination for a "worst photoshop" thread. Someone looked at that and all they saw is more white folks?
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
"Wisely, they didn’t Photoshop any non-white people into the picture, or it would have been too obvious." They were damn clever...but not smart enough to fool Perknose!
 

diesbudt

Diamond Member
Jun 1, 2012
3,393
0
0
"Wisely, they didn’t Photoshop any non-white people into the picture, or it would have been too obvious." They were damn clever...but not smart enough to fool Perknose!

Don't people understand? Go big or go home!

Should have photoshopped it to be all black/asian/hispanic men and women.
 

nextJin

Golden Member
Apr 16, 2009
1,848
0
0
It's pretty sad that he can't even get the crowds that a cracked out old senile racist tea party congressman could get well after the fact he lost the Primaries.

GOP: Burn it to the ground.
 

QuantumPion

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2005
6,010
1
76
Also, perky is racist because his avatar has a black cat watching a white cat lick itself, clearly trying to connect subconsciously sexual predator behavior and voyeurism with black people.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
I wouldn't jump to conclusions on this photo. It looks to me like it could easily be a bad stitch of a constructed panoramic photo. In the confined space of a tent, a photographer would need an ultra-wide-angle lens to capture that view, perhaps even a fish eye. One simply cannot back up far enough to get that view. It seems plausible they used automatic panoramic software to stitch together multiple photos, and the software did it poorly.

Such software works well when you have a landscape with distinct features. It wouldn't work so well when all you have is a room full of homogeneous, pasty white faces. ;)
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
I wouldn't jump to conclusions on this photo. It looks to me like it could easily be a bad stitch of a constructed panoramic photo. In the confined space of a tent, a photographer would need an ultra-wide-angle lens to capture that view, perhaps even a fish eye. One simply cannot back up far enough to get that view. It seems plausible they used automatic panoramic software to stitch together multiple photos, and the software did it poorly.

Such software works well when you have a landscape with distinct features. It wouldn't work so well when all you have is a room full of homogeneous, pasty white faces. ;)

It's pretty obvious that it's a botched patch job and buzzfeed goes about pointing out the obvious with red arrows saying in effect "water is wet!". The only possible conclusion? Need more white people!

I didn't see conspiracy I saw a crappy job. Imaging if the exact same thing happened at an OBAMA rally and someone accused him of getting more blacks. "Oh yeah we see that"? Hell no they would be saying what I did and it would be equally absurd. Reality isn't that hard.
 

xBiffx

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2011
8,232
2
0
What good does it do anyways to make the crowd at a Romney event look more white? Does the left even think about their attacks before they conduct them.

It would be far more scandalous and newsworthy if they were doing the opposite, I would think.
 

randomrogue

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2011
5,449
0
0
I have never seen that happen with stitching. It's cloning since photoshop would not be confused by the support beams.

Even if it was though it's still a blatant manipulation since tripled the size of the crowd.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
I wouldn't jump to conclusions on this photo. It looks to me like it could easily be a bad stitch of a constructed panoramic photo. In the confined space of a tent, a photographer would need an ultra-wide-angle lens to capture that view, perhaps even a fish eye. One simply cannot back up far enough to get that view. It seems plausible they used automatic panoramic software to stitch together multiple photos, and the software did it poorly.

Such software works well when you have a landscape with distinct features. It wouldn't work so well when all you have is a room full of homogeneous, pasty white faces. ;)
No lies? You're no fun. ;)
 

randomrogue

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2011
5,449
0
0
What good does it do anyways to make the crowd at a Romney event look more white? Does the left even think about their attacks before they conduct them.

It would be far more scandalous and newsworthy if they were doing the opposite, I would think.

The color of people's skin is irrelevant. The intent here was to multiply the crowd size many times over.
 

xBiffx

Diamond Member
Aug 22, 2011
8,232
2
0
Even if it was though it's still a blatant manipulation since tripled the size of the crowd.

You have never seen it before, can't really explain it in terms of imaging software but by God they were blatantly doing something to manipulate the look of the crowd size. You are sure of that.

Funny you are.