And the gun bans begin

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

poohbear

Platinum Member
Mar 11, 2003
2,284
5
81
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Care to clarify your concern? You have a problem with requiring a license to own a firearm? Why is this a problem? I need a driver's license, I need a fishing license, why would firearms be different?

Umm... Just gonna take a stab at this one...

Where in the constitution did our founding fathers feel the need to establish a specific right to go fishing... or drive... ???

They did, however, take the time to write the second amendment. You know... the part where it says that a free populace is dependant on that populace's ability to obtain and possess weapons. That's the problem. That concept is what is under attack.

If you're going to make an argument one way or the other, you might want to compare apples to apples.

but put things in context, that was the 18th century, where an empire loomed at the borders of America to the north. Things are very different now, do you still fear the king of England? The founding fathers also condoned & liberally partook in slavery, so it doesnt follow that everything they said and did was holy. We can question the validity of that amendment in the 21st century, no? i think its quite outdated by today's standards dont you think? im not against guns per say, but i dont think private citizens have any business owning guns, it should be reserved for law enforcement and the military, albeit that just seems like the most logical conclusion. What's your arguement for owning guns aside from this 2nd amendment? (im not american btw, im canadian, and its hard as heck to get a gun here in Toronto, Ontario. most ppl just give up trying from what i hear).

 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: poohbear
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Care to clarify your concern? You have a problem with requiring a license to own a firearm? Why is this a problem? I need a driver's license, I need a fishing license, why would firearms be different?

Umm... Just gonna take a stab at this one...

Where in the constitution did our founding fathers feel the need to establish a specific right to go fishing... or drive... ???

They did, however, take the time to write the second amendment. You know... the part where it says that a free populace is dependant on that populace's ability to obtain and possess weapons. That's the problem. That concept is what is under attack.

If you're going to make an argument one way or the other, you might want to compare apples to apples.

but put things in context, that was the 18th century, where an empire loomed at the borders of America to the north. Things are very different now, do you still fear the king of England? The founding fathers also condoned & liberally partook in slavery, so it doesnt follow that everything they said and did was holy. We can question the validity of that amendment in the 21st century, no? i think its quite outdated by today's standards dont you think? im not against guns per say, but i dont think private citizens have any business owning guns, it should be reserved for law enforcement and the military, albeit that just seems like the most logical conclusion. What's your arguement for owning guns aside from this 2nd amendment? (im not american btw, im canadian, and its hard as heck to get a gun here in Toronto, Ontario. most ppl just give up trying from what i hear).
We have a much more violent culture than Canada so I'm not sure how discussion is relevant but as far as having guns I had no problem bear & moose hunting in Ontario or Alberta. My friend owns a lodge up there (@eagle lake) and has tons of guns too.

In violent USA guns prevent lots of crimes. I read a story at least once a week of an aborted rape or robbery when gun owner shoots the felon. Besides right to self defense is a fundamental right no one should be able to take away. Someone bigger stronger faster younger has no right to victimize physically weak or elderly people. Guns are equalizer. All these school shootings could have been prevented, the type where gun yielding psycho is roaming the halls for hours executing at will, if only one or two had guns.

As far as govt oppression. a few hundred thousand hunters with high powered rifles and optics here could make the mujahideen in Iraq look like a school yard brawl. Never discount the power of small arms from a determined resistance.

Lots of reasons to own them besides hunting.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
I personally am dumping many guns because safe is overfull with guns and ammo. I had a gun show problem for years and was a spend thrift. Now I have over 20 guns I don't shoot and about 10000 rounds of ammo. I'd like to keep it down to one good pistol, one rifle probably a .308, and two shotguns my turkey gun and upland game gun. I'm waiting until Obama hysteria reaches full throttle before selling.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: K1052
From Bobby Rush with no cosponsors and has been referred to the Judiciary Committee where it will most likely die.

I think Heller has put a damper on enthusiasm in congress for more gun legislation, especially when there are more popular issues to be courted.

Bobby wants to make sure only his criminal constituency have guns. A much better plan , if he were really interested in preventing all those murders, would be a $500 per gun buy back in his crime ridden area.
 

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
johnny buys a gun. He moves 5 years later. Johnny doesn't know or remember about that the Feds are watching so he forgets to report. He's now a criminal. Wonderful.
 

KK

Lifer
Jan 2, 2001
15,903
4
81
Originally posted by: Farang

Actually law abiding citizens would only be treated like criminals as soon as they broke the law.

And yet criminals will still be doing the same crap they do, whether this shit passes or not. The only thing this will do is make current day law abiding citizens criminals and tax the hell out of us gunowners.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Care to clarify your concern? You have a problem with requiring a license to own a firearm? Why is this a problem? I need a driver's license, I need a fishing license, why would firearms be different?

Driving and fishing aren't in the Bill of Rights?

An activity not being in the Bill of Rights does not mean it isn't a right

Which was exactly the argument Jefferson and others had against even creating a Bill of Rights.

But hey, when you can get your entire edumacation from YouTube and stupid websites, why bother reading actual history books written by scholars, historians, and peer reviewed journals.

Far better to listen to everything on the internet, especially with regards to the Constitution, BoR, and finance/economics.
 

Gand1

Golden Member
Nov 17, 1999
1,026
0
76
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
johnny buys a gun. He moves 5 years later. Johnny doesn't know or remember about that the Feds are watching so he forgets to report. He's now a criminal. Wonderful.

Johnny should stop smoking weed....

Owning a gun is not something you simply forget about and if you actually shoot your gun it makes it even tougher to forget about.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! A national gun registry. Scary!!:roll:

Considering how it takes the Federal government to get states to cooperate with each other and considering how easy it is for criminals to cross state lines, something like this should've been done ages ago.

 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
johnny buys a gun. He moves 5 years later. Johnny doesn't know or remember about that the Feds are watching so he forgets to report. He's now a criminal. Wonderful.

Ignorance of the law has never been an excuse. Furthermore, while I have a problem with any infringement, there is some good basis for this yearly update if you believe in back ground checks in the first place, which even NRA is on board with. Did the person go crazy since purchasing gun? Did his criminal status change? and so on.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Originally posted by: Dari
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! A national gun registry. Scary!!:roll:

Considering how it takes the Federal government to get states to cooperate with each other and considering how easy it is for criminals to cross state lines, something like this should've been done ages ago.
:roll:
Criminals don't have registered guns. One can go downtown or in the meth hills and buy an AR15 serials wiped for $200 a .45 for $100, etc. This system, like all control and registration measures, will not impact criminals whatsoever.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Dari
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! A national gun registry. Scary!!:roll:

Considering how it takes the Federal government to get states to cooperate with each other and considering how easy it is for criminals to cross state lines, something like this should've been done ages ago.
:roll:
Criminals don't have registered guns. One can go downtown and buy an AR15 serials wiped for $200 a .45 for $100, etc. This system, like all control and registration measures, will not impact criminals whatsoever.

Some (or their friends or kin) do. That will just make law enforcement's job easier should they flee across state line.

Again, we have a federal system, not a centralized one. In situations like this, a more centralized setup makes more sense considering how easy it is for Americans to travel between states and how difficult it can be for states to cooperate. Besides, if all 50 states wanted to cooperate better it would have to be done through the Federal Government.
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: KK
And yet criminals will still be doing the same crap they do, whether this shit passes or not. The only thing this will do is make current day law abiding citizens into criminals and tax the hell out of us gunowners.
this.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,101
47,241
136
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Care to clarify your concern? You have a problem with requiring a license to own a firearm? Why is this a problem? I need a driver's license, I need a fishing license, why would firearms be different?

Driving and fishing aren't in the Bill of Rights?

An activity not being in the Bill of Rights does not mean it isn't a right

Which was exactly the argument Jefferson and others had against even creating a Bill of Rights.

But hey, when you can get your entire edumacation from YouTube and stupid websites, why bother reading actual history books written by scholars, historians, and peer reviewed journals.

Far better to listen to everything on the internet, especially with regards to the Constitution, BoR, and finance/economics.

The BoR was largely a product of the anti-federalists and was supported by Jefferson. Madison originally wasn't too hot on the idea but he was eventually persuaded and they got it through the federalist opposition.

 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,101
47,241
136
Originally posted by: Dari
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! A national gun registry. Scary!!:roll:

Considering how it takes the Federal government to get states to cooperate with each other and considering how easy it is for criminals to cross state lines, something like this should've been done ages ago.

A national registry is unacceptable to many people as it would create a list that could one day be used in confiscations.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,101
47,241
136
Originally posted by: Slick5150
Originally posted by: sandorski
...well regulated....

Nonono.. Just ignore that part. That was a Bill of Rights typo.

Define "well regulated" in the context of the constitution for us.
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
More laws...more taxes...more control...isn't America great! :roll: Tell me again...I'm kinda slow...why is this a good thing?
 

NeoV

Diamond Member
Apr 18, 2000
9,504
2
81
hmm...this is relatively tame for the typical AT gun thread

to the op - paranoid much? how about "and more paranoia begins"?



my favorite quote in this thread is "Criminals don't have registered guns. One can go downtown or in the meth hills and buy an AR15 serials wiped for $200 a .45 for $100, etc. This system, like all control and registration measures, will not impact criminals whatsoever."

This highlights the problem with people that are pro-gun without any common sense - are you telling me there is absolutely nothing that can be done to make things more difficult for criminals to acquire guns in this country?

I love the "you can go downtown and buy an AR15 w/serials wiped for $200" myth. Criminals steal guns or buy them, it's a rather simple equation. No, they don't buy them from gun dealers, they buy them from people who legally buy them - and sell them at a profit to criminals - heaven forbid we put any type of restrictions on how many guns you can buy though, wouldn't want to infringe on anyone's rights.........

you continue to believe that guns grow on trees, and that we just have to suck it up and accept that we live in the most violent country on the planet that isn't the site of a war

Just for the record, I'm not for banning guns in this country, but I think we should all be ashamed at the amount of gun-related violence we simply accept here, it's sad really.

Finally - to quote the founding fathers as 'proof' that any imposition on buying a gun is evil - these are the same people who said that women couldn't vote and that slavery was ok.
 

Sedition

Senior member
Dec 23, 2008
271
0
0
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Care to clarify your concern? You have a problem with requiring a license to own a firearm? Why is this a problem? I need a driver's license, I need a fishing license, why would firearms be different?

Driving and fishing aren't in the Bill of Rights?

An activity not being in the Bill of Rights does not mean it isn't a right

Which was exactly the argument Jefferson and others had against even creating a Bill of Rights.

But hey, when you can get your entire edumacation from YouTube and stupid websites, why bother reading actual history books written by scholars, historians, and peer reviewed journals.

Far better to listen to everything on the internet, especially with regards to the Constitution, BoR, and finance/economics.

Jefferson was the major pusher for the Bill of Rights. He refused to sign the Cons until he was guaranteed that one would be drafted.


15. The Bill of Rights

When our Constitution was first established, it was assumed that the description of specific powers granted to the government would leave no doubt as to what the government could and could not do, and that the absence of powers over the rights of the people would leave those rights protected. But Jefferson and others were wary of leaving such important matters up to inference. They insisted on a Bill of Rights that would state in unmistakable terms those rights of the people that must be left inviolate.

Text

Douche Bag. Don't ever lecture people on being educated.
 

Slick5150

Diamond Member
Nov 10, 2001
8,760
3
81
Originally posted by: K1052
Originally posted by: Slick5150
Originally posted by: sandorski
...well regulated....

Nonono.. Just ignore that part. That was a Bill of Rights typo.

Define "well regulated" in the context of the constitution for us.

Well I'd say registering guns is about as basic a form of regulation as you can possibly get?

Your car is registered. Your boat. Your pet. Your marriage. But your gun? The one thing that specifically is referenced as needing regulation in the Bill of Rights? Nah. Bad idea.

Or if you want to go by the presumed intended meaning of the phrase "well regulated (militia)" in the bill of rights, this whole argument is moot.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,101
47,241
136
Originally posted by: NeoV
Finally - to quote the founding fathers as 'proof' that any imposition on buying a gun is evil - these are the same people who said that women couldn't vote and that slavery was ok.

Women not having voting rights wasn't uncommon in the most of the world, a lot of European countries were well behind us on that count as well.

Slavery is a much more complicated issue.