Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: Eeezee
Care to clarify your concern? You have a problem with requiring a license to own a firearm? Why is this a problem? I need a driver's license, I need a fishing license, why would firearms be different?
Umm... Just gonna take a stab at this one...
Where in the constitution did our founding fathers feel the need to establish a specific right to go fishing... or drive... ???
They did, however, take the time to write the second amendment. You know... the part where it says that a free populace is dependant on that populace's ability to obtain and possess weapons. That's the problem. That concept is what is under attack.
If you're going to make an argument one way or the other, you might want to compare apples to apples.
but put things in context, that was the 18th century, where an empire loomed at the borders of America to the north. Things are very different now, do you still fear the king of England? The founding fathers also condoned & liberally partook in slavery, so it doesnt follow that everything they said and did was holy. We can question the validity of that amendment in the 21st century, no? i think its quite outdated by today's standards dont you think? im not against guns per say, but i dont think private citizens have any business owning guns, it should be reserved for law enforcement and the military, albeit that just seems like the most logical conclusion. What's your arguement for owning guns aside from this 2nd amendment? (im not american btw, im canadian, and its hard as heck to get a gun here in Toronto, Ontario. most ppl just give up trying from what i hear).
