• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

And now for a grammar lesson: Photoshop

They are serious. I read at another forum that if a product's name is commonly used as a verb, then they lose exclusive rights to that product name. I am sure there are lots of loopholes in that.
 
Originally posted by: TommyVercetti
They are serious. I read at another forum that if a product's name is commonly used as a verb, then they lose exclusive rights to that product name. I am sure there are lots of loopholes in that.
Really? I hope you're not just anandteching our chains
 
They're serious since you can lose your trademark if it becomes generic.

I'm not too sure, but I think maybe Xerox lost their trademark for photocopiers (when people used to say Xerox for copying) & might have gained it again since it's no longer used commonly. Even if I'm wrong, it's a good example to illustrate the point 🙂 Another example is aspirin, which I think Bayer used to have.
 
Originally posted by: Elitebull
Originally posted by: TommyVercetti
They are serious. I read at another forum that if a product's name is commonly used as a verb, then they lose exclusive rights to that product name. I am sure there are lots of loopholes in that.
Really? I hope you're not just anandteching our chains

lmao!
 
Back
Top