anyhoo, I only really hate them a little bitGuess so.
The words that bug me lately are:
anyway
little
bit
I hear them way too much, is my thinking.
anyhoo, I only really hate them a little bitGuess so.
The words that bug me lately are:
anyway
little
bit
I hear them way too much, is my thinking.
Looseness hinders sensation.As for your tightness read above
I took lots of cocaine and won this arguement.in realeatityi lost the arguementt.what i hav realise,is i should take lots more cocaine.
See what I mean? It's namby pamby to fill your sentences with "little," "a bit," "anyway..." Take a stand, goddamnit.anyhoo, I only really hate them a little bit
Efficiency in writing is appreciated with so much to read. I know this may sound ridiculous, but I pare down a lot when I edit, which is almost as fun as the expression. Writing uses a prismatic lexicon, extracting all the colors of the mind, but if you add fluff it never gets read.See what I mean? It's namby pamby to fill your sentences with "little," "a bit," "anyway..." Take a stand, goddamnit.
Yes!There are psychotherapies which direct people to rephrase statements from the use of the word "but" to the use of the word "and". I agree that they are not simply interchangeable, but they are both conjunctions used to join independent clauses. Each independent clause would be accurate as a sentence, so the choice of and or but indicates an attitude toward each clause. Sometimes use of but unfairly invalidates the first clause in a way that is reinforcing of an undesirable behavioral pattern.
For example:
"I really want to change, but I'm too anxious about it"
"I really want to change, and I'm anxious about it"
This also involves removal of the word "too" which changes things further. In either statement, a person could be experiencing anxiety which at that point in time prevents change from occurring. The first statement makes a person unlikely to imagine change could occur. The second allows a person to imagine that it might be possible to untangle anxiety from change.
I had a heart attack and a stroke.
I had a heart attack, but it was a very mild one.
I'm going with "but".
Haven't looked at the second link yet, but that first is fantastic!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erhard_Seminars_Training
Edit: these people did it too. The "notables:"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erhard_Seminars_Training#Notable_participants
One of the brain's jobs is mind. Mind is physical, able to be trained like a muscle, what doesn't serve can be dropped like a hot potato. Mind control is the warmest, most self serving and therefore globally serving, compassionate, educational path.Haven't looked at the second link yet, but that first is fantastic!
Edit: Just finished reading that first link. Erhard gave credit to Zen as the foundation for EST. I've been into Zen since 1970 or so. Back then I read a little book called Zen Flesh, Zen Bones: A Collection of Zen and Pre-Zen Writings. I reacquired the book a few years ago and have been rereading it the last week or so. I suppose, more than anything, it got me into Zen. Also, I'm partial to Alan Watt's teachings, his writings and lectures (many can be found on Youtube). Watts was deeply into Zen. It can be said that he was himself a Zen master.
Edit2: Ah, I see reading further that Erhard credits his intensive experiences directly with Alan Watts in the 1960's having paved the way for his eventual development of EST.
Edit3: Interesting, the link starts with this: Not to be confused with Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP).
It's interesting because I had the idea that this thread probably had something to do with NLP, which is an intriguing area I haven't explored much but I think might be worth considering.
I must assume what you mean when you use that hot button term is not the kind George Orwell addressed in 1984 but a very different kind, i.e. controlling your own mind, or as I've heard it said better I think, controlling your emotions. Your emotions dictate your mind and actions. If you are in command of your emotional life you should have reasonable control of your destiny -- my thinking.One of the brain's jobs is mind. Mind is physical, able to be trained like a muscle, what doesn't serve can be dropped like a hot potato. Mind control is the warmest, most self serving and therefore globally serving, compassionate, educational path.
Controlling one's mind is a better way of saying it. Part of my experience has always been to redefine things that seem unnecessarily fearful, and had a different side to them. "Shrinks" are bad? Snowflakes? Bleeding heart (liberal)? SJW? Sometimes my opinions leak out of my head.I must assume what you mean when you use that hot button term is not the kind George Orwell addressed in 1984 but a very different kind, i.e. controlling your own mind, or as I've heard it said better I think, controlling your emotions. Your emotions dictate your mind and actions. If you are in command of your emotional life you should have reasonable control of your destiny -- my thinking.
C can say it, but you can't say rindfleischetikettierungsüberwachungsaufgabenübertragungsgesetz without a K.i'm not a fan of the letter 'k' i don't think it belongs in the alphabet.