And.... Google screws up yet another service

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pulsar

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2003
5,224
306
126
So, everyone who uses google shopping already knows they neutered it by including only companies that pay to be included.

Now they've removed the ability to place an upper and lower price limit during a search.

Very nice. Next their going to remove the 'feature' where we can type in what product we're searching for.

First forcing people into google+, then neutering the shopping search, now removing the ability to set an upper limit on price.

At this rate, they'll catch up to microsoft soon in the 'stupid moves' department.

Edit: I found it! They neutered this one too. Just like amazon, you can only find it if you click into a specific 'department'. I'd love to hear the reasoning behind that.
 
Last edited:

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
their shopping search was idiotic from the start, sorting by price would essentially make the results worthless.
 

Red Storm

Lifer
Oct 2, 2005
14,233
234
106
You mean this option?

68y44w.jpg


I did not have to go into any specific area, it was right there after I searched for something.

Screw up not found.
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,600
126
yeah they killed picasa for me too with their G+ integration.
 

QueBert

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
23,015
1,202
126
You mean this option?

68y44w.jpg


I did not have to go into any specific area, it was right there after I searched for something.

Screw up not found.

there's a 50/50 chance a person won't have the same search page as you. Google likes to "test" new versions on random users. At my house it looks like yours, at my work the bar's along the top horizontal and there's different search options. The dynamite thing is you have zero option for picking the other if you don't like the one you have.
 

phucheneh

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2012
7,306
5
0
Google shopping has always been just, like, a google search with worse results.

Google as a whole is pretty much ruined [edit: Google the search engine, that is]. Their search engine has gotten absurd to the point where 90% of my searches turn up 'oh, I'm sorry, I think you meant [insert completely different words]' results. Not the corrections ('Did you mean [blank]?'), but this whole hidden synonym engine that was apparently compiled by some migrant workers that they handed a really shitty Thesaurus to.

It's sad that such an AWESOME framework is ruined by a desire to cater to stupidity.

However, I still have to say I love Google (as a company) for other reasons. Like, where would we be if they hadn't given Apple the giant Android slap upside their fucking faces?

Yeah, they're in it for the money like everyone else, but I'm thankful we still have a company like Google in the tech scene. I think they offer, to some degree, genuine 'innovation' without the consumer rape, patent trolling, ect of most other corporations.

They just need to quit it with the desire to Facebookerize (I'm-a gonna patent that word there) everything to compete with iStuff.
 

KeithP

Diamond Member
Jun 15, 2000
5,664
202
106
Now they've removed the ability to place an upper and lower price limit during a search.

Incorrect.

Edit: I found it! They neutered this one too. Just like amazon, you can only find it if you click into a specific 'department'. I'd love to hear the reasoning behind that.

Still incorrect.

-KeithP
 

Red Storm

Lifer
Oct 2, 2005
14,233
234
106
there's a 50/50 chance a person won't have the same search page as you. Google likes to "test" new versions on random users. At my house it looks like yours, at my work the bar's along the top horizontal and there's different search options. The dynamite thing is you have zero option for picking the other if you don't like the one you have.

Link?
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
their shopping search was idiotic from the start, sorting by price would essentially make the results worthless.
This one is irritating. Some kind of "price:relevance ratio" sort of thing might have worked. And with Google's programming and computational capabilities, I'm sure they could have made it work.
 

Kev

Lifer
Dec 17, 2001
16,367
4
81
oh i thought this thread was going to be about how they raped youtube's interface
 
Status
Not open for further replies.