Jaskalas
Lifer
Anatomy of War in the 21st Century
Struggle for willingness to fight back
Terrorists are proxy groups for a people to wage war in an attempt to avoid responsibility falling on their government or their people. A new unconventional method of warfare playing to both the world crowd and to continue fighting under the radar of conventional armies. Their opponent?s armies would otherwise press a button and decimate them with extremely powerful explosives if they mobilized into a conventional army.
They mask their identities, pretending to be innocents and setting up base of operations in everyday neighborhoods where they conduct sniper attacks on easily identified conventional forces. Return fire against these groups causes, as they desire, a larger than normal loss of life among innocents. This causes wide public support for the ?freedom fighters? while causing condemnation for the nation they wage war against.
This is the insanity of it all, the world will give them extra protections when they purposefully endanger and kill innocents
Conventional Armies fighting these unconventional forces is a bloody mess. Like the British during the revolution standing in perfectly organized rows waiting to be picked apart, we march our soldiers out into the streets as if they are policemen against local thugs. When fighting a war, we could not do more to pose a great risk of life and injury to our soldiers as they battle a foe they cannot see.
Then even when we are attacked and can see the enemy, not one terrorist will die wearing a uniform. Nothing will tell the cameras who was innocent or not, but they camera will pick up the loss of apparent civilian life and condemn the conventional army. Worst yet, there really WILL be innocents killed as the unconventional forces hide among them and target them for the slaughter, it will remain the conventional force that the world crowd likes to blame.
Recently in Iraq, nothing could be further proof that conventional methods of combating a new unconventional war machine are a complete disaster. The conventional forces are then pressured into surrender by the world crowd, and terrorism grows ever more popular due to apparent victories.
Resolution of war comes when both sides cease fire. This is usually caused by diplomacy, or when one side surrenders to another. The very basics are that you must make your opponent want to surrender. You must wound them so grievously that they cannot continue to kill your people.
How soon we forget the requirements for victory in World War 2. We carpet bombed entire towns into rubble. We purposefully fire bombed Tokyo, and then unleashed the nuclear weapon. Victory then required that we brutalize our enemy to the point of their surrender. Why should it be today that we are the ones who are unwilling to fight brutally against a brutal enemy?
They abuse civilian populations, aim for innocents to die, we should do everything within our power to defeat them and force every last one of the soldiers of an unconventional war machine to either surrender or die. This is very difficult to do without involving the innocents they drag into the war zone. The battle lines have to be drawn, and everyone needs to understand the consequences of living within a mile of an unconventional army waging war in your own neighborhood. Anyone who can do so should flee. Others should stand and revolt against these unconventional forces; we must apply the pressure for causing this.
Brutal Measures do not have to ensure the loss of all innocent lives. However, they must be strong enough to ensure that the opponent surrenders their hostilities and will stop targeting innocent lives.
I propose that we turn entire towns into rubble, piece by piece, until the will to combat us is crushed. The buildings can, for the most part, remain standing. However, the entire infrastructure must be removed. Utilities, such as electricity, cell phone towers, roads, ports, airports. Towns from which unconventional armies wage war must be brought to suffer for being the host. This is the pressure that will set an example world wide that no one wants to have their neighbor bring our wrath upon them.
This will no doubt result in some loss of lives, uninhabitable war zones are not easy to survive in, but it gives them time to truly be innocent and leave without their weapons cache. This is not unlike a siege, against a position too heavily fortified to destroy head on. Which in this case, is a position in which an unconventional army MUST be rooted out.
To do anything less gives them a signal that utilizing an unconventional warfare that purposefully kills innocents will give them an advantage over us, and possibly even victory. Before the delusion becomes reality we are the ones who must turn their brutal measures back on them. It is us who must devise a strategy for ensuring that our kids are not that ones who inherit a world in which it?s a proven normal to use them as human shields for someone else?s unconventional war machine.
A quick note regarding this post. I do not claim my idea of responding to them and all its details to be flawless, or certain resolution. However, I do know we are ensured defeat if we support our opponent?s unconventional forces by allowing them safe haven. By allowing them morale equivalency, as if in some way without them using innocents as human shields that we would still end up killing the innocents.
We must meet their brutality with a crushing force or give them the satisfaction of knowing that terrorism is our bane and that they should exploit it further. To lose now, is to ensure they continue this tactic. As of yet, I have never seen the world respond properly to this unconventional method of waging war. It is on the rise because of these failures.
Struggle for willingness to fight back
Terrorists are proxy groups for a people to wage war in an attempt to avoid responsibility falling on their government or their people. A new unconventional method of warfare playing to both the world crowd and to continue fighting under the radar of conventional armies. Their opponent?s armies would otherwise press a button and decimate them with extremely powerful explosives if they mobilized into a conventional army.
They mask their identities, pretending to be innocents and setting up base of operations in everyday neighborhoods where they conduct sniper attacks on easily identified conventional forces. Return fire against these groups causes, as they desire, a larger than normal loss of life among innocents. This causes wide public support for the ?freedom fighters? while causing condemnation for the nation they wage war against.
This is the insanity of it all, the world will give them extra protections when they purposefully endanger and kill innocents
Conventional Armies fighting these unconventional forces is a bloody mess. Like the British during the revolution standing in perfectly organized rows waiting to be picked apart, we march our soldiers out into the streets as if they are policemen against local thugs. When fighting a war, we could not do more to pose a great risk of life and injury to our soldiers as they battle a foe they cannot see.
Then even when we are attacked and can see the enemy, not one terrorist will die wearing a uniform. Nothing will tell the cameras who was innocent or not, but they camera will pick up the loss of apparent civilian life and condemn the conventional army. Worst yet, there really WILL be innocents killed as the unconventional forces hide among them and target them for the slaughter, it will remain the conventional force that the world crowd likes to blame.
Recently in Iraq, nothing could be further proof that conventional methods of combating a new unconventional war machine are a complete disaster. The conventional forces are then pressured into surrender by the world crowd, and terrorism grows ever more popular due to apparent victories.
Resolution of war comes when both sides cease fire. This is usually caused by diplomacy, or when one side surrenders to another. The very basics are that you must make your opponent want to surrender. You must wound them so grievously that they cannot continue to kill your people.
How soon we forget the requirements for victory in World War 2. We carpet bombed entire towns into rubble. We purposefully fire bombed Tokyo, and then unleashed the nuclear weapon. Victory then required that we brutalize our enemy to the point of their surrender. Why should it be today that we are the ones who are unwilling to fight brutally against a brutal enemy?
They abuse civilian populations, aim for innocents to die, we should do everything within our power to defeat them and force every last one of the soldiers of an unconventional war machine to either surrender or die. This is very difficult to do without involving the innocents they drag into the war zone. The battle lines have to be drawn, and everyone needs to understand the consequences of living within a mile of an unconventional army waging war in your own neighborhood. Anyone who can do so should flee. Others should stand and revolt against these unconventional forces; we must apply the pressure for causing this.
Brutal Measures do not have to ensure the loss of all innocent lives. However, they must be strong enough to ensure that the opponent surrenders their hostilities and will stop targeting innocent lives.
I propose that we turn entire towns into rubble, piece by piece, until the will to combat us is crushed. The buildings can, for the most part, remain standing. However, the entire infrastructure must be removed. Utilities, such as electricity, cell phone towers, roads, ports, airports. Towns from which unconventional armies wage war must be brought to suffer for being the host. This is the pressure that will set an example world wide that no one wants to have their neighbor bring our wrath upon them.
This will no doubt result in some loss of lives, uninhabitable war zones are not easy to survive in, but it gives them time to truly be innocent and leave without their weapons cache. This is not unlike a siege, against a position too heavily fortified to destroy head on. Which in this case, is a position in which an unconventional army MUST be rooted out.
To do anything less gives them a signal that utilizing an unconventional warfare that purposefully kills innocents will give them an advantage over us, and possibly even victory. Before the delusion becomes reality we are the ones who must turn their brutal measures back on them. It is us who must devise a strategy for ensuring that our kids are not that ones who inherit a world in which it?s a proven normal to use them as human shields for someone else?s unconventional war machine.
A quick note regarding this post. I do not claim my idea of responding to them and all its details to be flawless, or certain resolution. However, I do know we are ensured defeat if we support our opponent?s unconventional forces by allowing them safe haven. By allowing them morale equivalency, as if in some way without them using innocents as human shields that we would still end up killing the innocents.
We must meet their brutality with a crushing force or give them the satisfaction of knowing that terrorism is our bane and that they should exploit it further. To lose now, is to ensure they continue this tactic. As of yet, I have never seen the world respond properly to this unconventional method of waging war. It is on the rise because of these failures.
