Anandtech Forums during Rush-hours: Packet Loss Galore.. [] Post your ping-times!

Elledan · Jun 4, 2001

And I wondered why I kept getting time-outs:

=======================

Ping - Monday, June 04, 2001 20:17:15
Generated by CyberKit Version 2.5
Copyright © 1996-2000 by Luc Neijens

Address: forums.anandtech.com
Number of Packets: 10
Packet size: 64
Timeout: 15
Delay: 1000
Resolve Addresses: Yes
Don't Fragment: No

#1 No response (): , ttl=, ms
#2 No response (): , ttl=, ms
#3 forums.anandtech.com (216.151.100.125): Echo Reply, ttl=236, 340 ms
#4 forums.anandtech.com (216.151.100.125): Echo Reply, ttl=236, 340 ms
#5 forums.anandtech.com (216.151.100.125): Echo Reply, ttl=236, 340 ms
#6 No response (): , ttl=, ms
#7 No response (): , ttl=, ms
#8 No response (): , ttl=, ms
#9 No response (): , ttl=, ms
#10 No response (): , ttl=, ms

Statistics: Out 10, in 3, loss 70%, times (min/avg/max) 340/340/340 ms

nateholtrop · Jun 4, 2001

why did you use a program why not dos!?

nate

spidey07 · Jun 4, 2001

dos ping pretty muchs sucks, very inaccurate.

nateholtrop · Jun 4, 2001

dos is fine and the results can be trusted

nate

kami · Jun 4, 2001

no PL here...

Amused · Jun 4, 2001

Pinging forums.anandtech.com [216.151.100.125] from ***** with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=52 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=49 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=51 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=51 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=54 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=51 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=51 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=50 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=57 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=51 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=51 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=54 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=50 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=51 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=50 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=52 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=52 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=51 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=50 (ms)
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 TTL=241 time=50 (ms)

Sent=20 Received=20 Loss=%0 Time(min/avg/max)=49/51/57 (ms)

AT&T @home cable modem... Using @home network diagnostics v2.2

Not bad, but the forums do seem slow to me sometimes.

Actually, my ping rules. You all may bow to my ping 😀

koldklock · Jun 4, 2001

Pinging forums.anandtech.com [216.151.100.125] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=241
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=131ms TTL=241
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=241
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=241

Ping statistics for 216.151.100.125:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 122ms, Maximum = 131ms, Average = 126ms

Amused · Jun 4, 2001

Hey, Elledan maybe you could change the thread title to say "everyone post your AT ping" or something like that?

spidey07 · Jun 4, 2001

looks like there was some kind of routing mix up between uunet and stargate.

purrin along now though.

DannyLove · Jun 4, 2001

but can you explain that in spanish?

danny~!

Viper GTS · Jun 4, 2001

Pinging forums.anandtech.com [216.151.100.125] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=240ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=281ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=240ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=241ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=230ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=231ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=240ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=251ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=240ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=240ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=240ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=230ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=241ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=240ms TTL=240
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=261ms TTL=240

Workin' fine here.

Viper GTS

goldboyd · Jun 4, 2001

Yup, you're right, definately problems:

179 packets transmitted, 179 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 35.618/36.874/52.893/1.632 ms

Jothaxe · Jun 4, 2001

Pinging forums.anandtech.com [216.151.100.125] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=234
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=234
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=234
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=234

Ping statistics for 216.151.100.125:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 115ms, Maximum = 127ms, Average = 120ms

Sacotool · Jun 4, 2001

C:\>ping forums.anandtech.com

Pinging forums.anandtech.com [216.151.100.125] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=242
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=242
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=242
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=242

Ping statistics for 216.151.100.125:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 23ms, Maximum = 26ms, Average = 24ms

C:\>

kami · Jun 4, 2001

C:\WINDOWS>ping forums.anandtech.com

Pinging forums.anandtech.com [216.151.100.125] with 32 by

Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=235
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=235
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=235
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=235

Ping statistics for 216.151.100.125:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 114ms, Maximum = 120ms, Average = 115ms

Amused · Jun 4, 2001

<< C:\>ping forums.anandtech.com

Pinging forums.anandtech.com [216.151.100.125] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=242
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=242
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=242
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=242

Ping statistics for 216.151.100.125:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 23ms, Maximum = 26ms, Average = 24ms

C:\> >>

ACK!!! My ping is no longer king 🙁

blueghost75 · Jun 4, 2001

Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=250ms TTL=242
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=242
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=242
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=242

Pepsi90919 · Jun 4, 2001

Pinging forums.anandtech.com [216.151.100.125] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=238
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=238
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=238
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=238

Ping statistics for 216.151.100.125:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 44ms, Maximum = 48ms, Average = 46ms

gittyup · Jun 4, 2001

Pinging forums.anandtech.com [216.151.100.125] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=239
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=239
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=239
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=239

Ping statistics for 216.151.100.125:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 50ms, Maximum = 71ms, Average = 57ms

johneetrash · Jun 4, 2001

C:\>ping forums.anandtech.com

Pinging forums.anandtech.com [216.151.100.125] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=239
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=239
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=239
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=239

Ping statistics for 216.151.100.125:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 90ms, Maximum = 90ms, Average = 90ms

C:\>

rootaxs · Jun 4, 2001

No probs here either. It's *very* consistent on my end.

Pinging forums.anandtech.com [216.151.100.125] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=243

Ping statistics for 216.151.100.125:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 60ms, Average = 60ms

MajesticMoose · Jun 4, 2001

I had an average of 175ms on a 56k (0% loss).

BTW, 2:20 pm is by no means rush hour on the forums.

m00se

snakesnfrogs · Jun 4, 2001

Pinging forums.anandtech.com [216.151.100.125] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=242
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=242
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=242
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=242

Ping statistics for 216.151.100.125:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 106ms, Maximum = 110ms, Average = 107ms

reitz · Jun 4, 2001

<< C:\WINDOWS>ping -t forums.anandtech.com

Pinging forums.anandtech.com [216.151.100.125] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=251
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=251
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=251
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=251
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=251
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=251
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=251
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=251
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=251

Ping statistics for 216.151.100.125:
Packets: Sent = 9, Received = 9, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 1ms, Average = 0ms
Control-C >>

I think I am the winner. 😀

kassy · Jun 4, 2001

C:\WINDOWS>ping forums.anandtech.com

Pinging forums.anandtech.com [216.151.100.125] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=83ms TTL=243
Reply from 216.151.100.125: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=243

Ping statistics for 216.151.100.125:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 83ms, Maximum = 96ms, Average = 92ms

Anandtech Forums during Rush-hours: Packet Loss Galore.. [] Post your ping-times!

Banned

Diamond Member

No Lifer

Diamond Member

Lifer

Elite Member

Banned

Elite Member

No Lifer

Lifer

Lifer

Golden Member

Golden Member

Platinum Member

Lifer

Elite Member

Golden Member

Lifer

Diamond Member

Diamond Member

Platinum Member

Diamond Member

Banned

Elite Member

Guest