• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Anand benches with BD hotfixes

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
well, with intel content to keep mainstream buyers hamstrung with 4 cores, AMD could theoretically make a comeback with the enthusiasts if they can offer a platform that doesn't cost $1000 just to get started.

As software becomes more and more multithread aware they won't have to compete with intel's sheer single thread or even IPC dominance if AMD can offer a brute force multi core solution that won't break the bank.

I'm extremely happy with my Sandybridge 2600K, but when I look down the road all I see form intel with Ivy and Haswell on a mainstream platform is the same 4 core strategy with all the emphasis on developing the integrated GPU, basically only progressive clockrate increases... That leaves us with socket 2011 with its current vastly overpriced chipset and CPUs that start @ $600 if you want something that can distinguish itself from the mainstream lineups.

While BD looks like a complete failure to me right now, I could very well see myself being enticed by a future version of the product right around the time Haswell hits if AMD can tighten up some things and make an attractive solution for a reasonable price, as I'm currently not at all happy with what Intel has done with s2011 in general, and I won't be content with mere clockrate and IPC increases from s1155 or s1150 with Haswell.

Nobody is going to give a damn about # of cores, they care about performance and # cores are just one variable in that equation. To say AMD is going to dominate in the future because they have "MOOAR CORES!" is wishful thinking at best.
 
The problem with BD is what it is up against with. Intel is just on a roll and has a excellent line up right now.

That is kind of what I was thinking about with BD. If AMD would have been able to keep BD's orginal time line( I can not remember when it was first supposed to come out) it would have been up againts lesser Intel CPU's. Intel has been on their A game from Conroe on, but with all the SoC and going for lower power Intel will slow CPU performance down to do this. It will open the door for AMD and GF to fine tune BD or BD+ to get back in the game with Intel.
 
It will open the door for AMD and GF to fine tune BD or BD+ to get back in the game with Intel.
nope amd is left too behind with the bulldozer project.
130 watt vs 77 watt of the coming ivy bridge!?!?!?!
so even if bd2? bd3? or waht ever come to match sandy bridge perfomanse
then intel will simply raise the clockspeed and the power consumption to 130 watt. so thats 68% more clockspeed
sooooooooo amd is 68% behind (cause tdp) + 30 in perfomanse so thats hmmmmmmmmmm 100% worse than intel
lol i do not think ever the perfomanse diferense was that huge as it is right now
so why intel rush!?!?!?!??!
make cpu that consume less and earn even more cause intel will sell them with extremely cheap coolers more $$$ to be earned there
and if by any case amd or somewhere else comes ohhhhhhhh well raise tdp
 
Back
Top