Analyze the Morality of this

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,213
14
81

I downloaded this incredible high Quality Rip of Yes's famous 90125 Album and my buddy told me technically that was illegal.

Hell, I own the vinyl album and the CD but I could NEVER get a rip that sounded this fabulous.

I don't understand why I would be in the wrong if I OWN the album but my buddy insists the act of downloding it from (unnamed place) is illegal.

I think it is B.S. myself....


Ausm
 

Spikesoldier

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 2001
6,766
0
0
it would be the same as if you backed up that vinyl record yourself.

i dont understand, but your buddy is a moron.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,398
8,568
126
downloading isn't the illegal part, redistributing is
 

Just because you have cookies in your house, you're not allowed to walk into a store, grab a box of cookies, and walk out. Owning something is not an excuse for stealing an identical item.
 

toekramp

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2001
8,426
2
0
Originally posted by: jumpr
Just because you have cookies in your house, you're not allowed to walk into a store, grab a box of cookies, and walk out. Owning something is not an excuse for stealing an identical item.

your analysis makes 0 sense, the store is now without that product and no one can buy those cookies..
 

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,213
14
81
Originally posted by: jumpr
Just because you have cookies in your house, you're not allowed to walk into a store, grab a box of cookies, and walk out. Owning something is not an excuse for stealing an identical item.



Jumpr my buddy thinks the same way you do but I have a hard time understanding his way of thinking.

No Slam on you BTW, that is why I wanted to discusss this.


Ausm
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
It's not "wrong", even if it is illegal. Legality and morality have a lot of overlap, but are rarely perfectly in line.

Jumpr your analogy is not very good ;)
 

Originally posted by: Skoorb
It's not "wrong", even if it is illegal. Legality and morality have a lot of overlap, but are rarely perfectly in line.

Jumpr your analogy is not very good ;)
Well that's the way I understand it! :)

Seriously though, I realize that there are unlimited copies of the music b/c it's in digital format, but I just don't think it's right, from a moral standpoint, since it's technically taking 'property' that's not yours.

BTW, if you own the CD AND the vinyl, how is it impossible for you to get a high-quality rip from it? Can't you just encode in WMA lossless? Or is there something I'm missing here.
 

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,213
14
81
Originally posted by: jumpr
Originally posted by: Skoorb
It's not "wrong", even if it is illegal. Legality and morality have a lot of overlap, but are rarely perfectly in line.

Jumpr your analogy is not very good ;)
Well that's the way I understand it! :)

Seriously though, I realize that there are unlimited copies of the music b/c it's in digital format, but I just don't think it's right, from a moral standpoint, since it's technically taking 'property' that's not yours.

BTW, if you own the CD AND the vinyl, how is it impossible for you to get a high-quality rip from it? Can't you just encode in WMA lossless? Or is there something I'm missing here.



I tried various programs and tools but it never really sounds that good. The rip I aquired sounds like you are in the studio... simply amazing.

Ausm
 

tk149

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2002
7,253
1
0
Morally, it's fine.

Legally, it's wrong IMHO. You're allowed to make backup copies of your OWN CD's for home use under the Fair Use provisions of the Copyright Code, but you're not allowed to copy someone else's.

Stupid laws.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Originally posted by: jumpr
Originally posted by: Skoorb
It's not "wrong", even if it is illegal. Legality and morality have a lot of overlap, but are rarely perfectly in line.

Jumpr your analogy is not very good ;)
Well that's the way I understand it! :)

Seriously though, I realize that there are unlimited copies of the music b/c it's in digital format, but I just don't think it's right, from a moral standpoint, since it's technically taking 'property' that's not yours.

BTW, if you own the CD AND the vinyl, how is it impossible for you to get a high-quality rip from it? Can't you just encode in WMA lossless? Or is there something I'm missing here.
Well, let's assume that he can't rip for some reason. Now, what's wrong with DLing a copy? Nobody is selling a special high-quality version. All they're selling is vinyl, CD, etc. He already bought those, so how can he possibly give the owner of the material a single penny more? He can't, and they are not losing out on anything by him DLing a higher quality version. They lose nothing at all (whereas if you steal cookies from a store, that costs the money), PLUS they can't gain a single thing by him not doing it and buying it (since it can't be bought), and thus he should DL with abandon.

 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
I'm pretty sure it's technically a copyright violation, but I agree with Skoorb that it is not wrong in an ethical sense.
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
No, it's not a morality issue at all. What you are doing would be like saying you couldn't rip your Yes album very well but then took it to a friend to rip because he has much better software to do it.
 

brigden

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2002
8,702
2
81
Originally posted by: jumpr
Just because you have cookies in your house, you're not allowed to walk into a store, grab a box of cookies, and walk out. Owning something is not an excuse for stealing an identical item.

Wrong logic. There is nothing wrong with what Ausm has done.
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
As a certified Goody Two-Shoes I say this is neither immoral nor unethical.

Legally, who knows.

Ethically, you own a license to the music, in fact you say you have already bought _2_ licenses.
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,998
126
You're allowed to have a digital backup of a CD you own. What's the difference between ripping it yourself or using somebody else's rip? There's nothing wrong morally with downloading a copy rather than making your own. The guy you downloaded from might be on shaky moral ground, you're not.

It does raise the question as to why you're not able to easily duplicate the quality of somebody elses rip though.
 
Mar 22, 2002
10,483
32
81
Actually, the law says that if you own a CD or that music, you are allowed to have the mp3s. By either downloading them or ripping them, you can do this. Your buddy is in the wrong. I had a cop come in my house and he saw all my burned CDs and made a comment, and then I showed him all the other original CDs that were scratched beyond repair. He said "Oh, ok, that's good. You're probably the only person I know who knows how the mp3 system works."

+Brent
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
Make sure to yell at your buddy if he ever goes 1mph over the limit, does a rolling stop, jaywalks, or any other event warranting of rubbing his overly pious face in his own junk. :p

- M4H
 

Stark

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2000
7,735
0
0
to any reasonable human being, you did nothing wrong

to the RIAA, you're going to hell.