miketheidiot
Lifer
- Sep 3, 2004
- 11,060
- 1
- 0
Do you also think that humans aren't to blame for the arsenic, mercury and other crap in the water?
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Do you also think that humans aren't to blame for the arsenic, mercury and other crap in the water?
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
It's not global warming anymore, it's climate change. The environmentalists got it wrong, so they changed what it's called.
It's clear the evidence keeps changing, and new theories keep arising. Because of this, it is very important we stand back and keep studying. Nothing major has happened yet.
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: aidanjm
The images of parts of the world (huge glaciers, ice shelves, permafrost) just melting away are sombre.
They have been doing that for thousands of years. Perhaps you?ve heard of the cyclical weather pattern known as Ice Ages. We?re coming out of one and will continue to do so until the next one. This has never changed.
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: BlancoNino
It's not global warming anymore, it's climate change. The environmentalists got it wrong, so they changed what it's called.
It's clear the evidence keeps changing, and new theories keep arising. Because of this, it is very important we stand back and keep studying. Nothing major has happened yet.
The globe is warming as an average, however not all places will get warmer. Changing the term was done to avoid a stupid fallacious argument used against global warming.
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Jaskalas
Originally posted by: aidanjm
The images of parts of the world (huge glaciers, ice shelves, permafrost) just melting away are sombre.
They have been doing that for thousands of years. Perhaps you?ve heard of the cyclical weather pattern known as Ice Ages. We?re coming out of one and will continue to do so until the next one. This has never changed.
the ice melting now has been ice for several ice ages. Its a bit unprecedented.
Originally posted by: Deptacon
so tommorow to fix this problem, everyone who is complaining will:
A: walk to work, no matter how far....
B: eat thier cooked food raw
C: eat thier cooled food warm
D: not use any device that use electricity....
maybe, just maybe, you will have a job and not havin food posioning at the end of the day.....thats even if you make it to work....cvause some of us here I bet drive way to far to get to work.
Originally posted by: Deptacon
so tommorow to fix this problem, everyone who is complaining will:
A: walk to work, no matter how far....
B: eat thier cooked food raw
C: eat thier cooled food warm
D: not use any device that use electricity....
maybe, just maybe, you will have a job and not havin food posioning at the end of the day.....thats even if you make it to work....cvause some of us here I bet drive way to far to get to work.
Originally posted by: Legend
Originally posted by: Deptacon
so tommorow to fix this problem, everyone who is complaining will:
A: walk to work, no matter how far....
B: eat thier cooked food raw
C: eat thier cooled food warm
D: not use any device that use electricity....
maybe, just maybe, you will have a job and not havin food posioning at the end of the day.....thats even if you make it to work....cvause some of us here I bet drive way to far to get to work.
Nuclear, hydro, wind power.
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Legend
Originally posted by: Deptacon
so tommorow to fix this problem, everyone who is complaining will:
A: walk to work, no matter how far....
B: eat thier cooked food raw
C: eat thier cooled food warm
D: not use any device that use electricity....
maybe, just maybe, you will have a job and not havin food posioning at the end of the day.....thats even if you make it to work....cvause some of us here I bet drive way to far to get to work.
Nuclear, hydro, wind power.
solar, geothermal
Originally posted by: Deptacon
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Legend
Originally posted by: Deptacon
so tommorow to fix this problem, everyone who is complaining will:
A: walk to work, no matter how far....
B: eat thier cooked food raw
C: eat thier cooled food warm
D: not use any device that use electricity....
maybe, just maybe, you will have a job and not havin food posioning at the end of the day.....thats even if you make it to work....cvause some of us here I bet drive way to far to get to work.
Nuclear, hydro, wind power.
solar, geothermal
nuclear really is the answer, except the very far left goes nutts about it.....even though its so clean, so efficent, so cheap, and 10 times safer then it was just 20 or 30 years ago
solar and wind.... cost per Kwh is too high, geothermal is restricted to location...hydro the same, but we use it where we can
Originally posted by: zephyrprime
Legendkiller, your argument is weak. It prevents a strawman argument because you say that the other side says that "the earth was never warmer in the past" but in reality, the other side has never claimed that. Nobody has ever claimed that.
Everyone knows and accepts that the earth has had periods of cold and warmth and this isn't the hottest period in history by a longshot.
So there you go.
Also, there were no oceans in the midwest tens of thousands of years ago. That was tens of millions of years ago. Back when pangaea broke up, the north america plate started subducting the pacific plate and eventually, all the western and midwestern states were lifted out of the seabed where they had been before.
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Correlation does not infer causation.
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: zephyrprime
Legendkiller, your argument is weak. It prevents a strawman argument because you say that the other side says that "the earth was never warmer in the past" but in reality, the other side has never claimed that. Nobody has ever claimed that.
Everyone knows and accepts that the earth has had periods of cold and warmth and this isn't the hottest period in history by a longshot.
So there you go.
Also, there were no oceans in the midwest tens of thousands of years ago. That was tens of millions of years ago. Back when pangaea broke up, the north america plate started subducting the pacific plate and eventually, all the western and midwestern states were lifted out of the seabed where they had been before.
The claim is that we have deviated outside the mean, but we really haven't. The other side says that humans are impacting the environment, causing global warming. How can they extrapolate human effects when we are at a peak right now? Just because it's warmer than the past peak doesn't mean that *WE* caused that. Correlation does not infer causation.
Originally posted by: BrownTown
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Correlation does not infer causation.
Yes, thank god more people understand this, i was starting to think i was alone. Just becasue the earth is getting warmer does NOT nescecarrily mean that humans are causing it, it *could* mean that, or it could be a million other things. The little ice age happened during human history, and I don't see everyone blaming it on people. I'm not saying that humans can't influence the enviroment, we all know they can, the ozone hole is proof of that. However, you need some pretty darn good proof that humans are behind global warming before we go changing the entire foundation of our society to try to combat it. Also, you need some good proof that this change is for the worse, everyone assumes change is bad, but again, we need some pretty hard evidence that global warming is gonna casue us great harm before we try to combat it. You have to understand, energy is the basis for everything we do, every good and service relies on affordable energy prices. When energy prices go up the price of EVERYTHING goes up, and im taling about REAL costs, if energy requires more of our resources to produce than thats less resources producing other things you want.
Originally posted by: BrownTown
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Correlation does not infer causation.
Yes, thank god more people understand this, i was starting to think i was alone. Just becasue the earth is getting warmer does NOT nescecarrily mean that humans are causing it, it *could* mean that, or it could be a million other things. The little ice age happened during human history, and I don't see everyone blaming it on people. I'm not saying that humans can't influence the enviroment, we all know they can, the ozone hole is proof of that. However, you need some pretty darn good proof that humans are behind global warming before we go changing the entire foundation of our society to try to combat it. Also, you need some good proof that this change is for the worse, everyone assumes change is bad, but again, we need some pretty hard evidence that global warming is gonna casue us great harm before we try to combat it. You have to understand, energy is the basis for everything we do, every good and service relies on affordable energy prices. When energy prices go up the price of EVERYTHING goes up, and im taling about REAL costs, if energy requires more of our resources to produce than thats less resources producing other things you want.
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: syzygy
afterwards, the scientific concensus claimed by gore is far from true. and, yes, there was a scientific rebuttal to many of the points made in the film.
How can you rebutt something that is here - now - before our eyes?
"Climate change is with us. A decade ago, it was conjecture. Now the future is unfolding before our eyes. Canada's Inuit see it in disappearing Arctic ice and permafrost. The shantytown dwellers of Latin America and Southern Asia see it in lethal storms and floods. Europeans see it in disappearing glaciers, forest fires and fatal heat waves.
Scientists see it in tree rings, ancient coral and bubbles trapped in ice cores. These reveal that the world has not been as warm as it is now for a millennium or more. The three warmest years on record have all occurred since 1998; 19 of the warmest 20 since 1980. And Earth has probably never warmed as fast as in the past 30 years - a period when natural influences on global temperatures, such as solar cycles and volcanoes should have cooled us down. Studies of the thermal inertia of the oceans suggest that there is more warming in the pipeline."
New Scientist
this is really the most pressing issue of our times. God forbid that Greenland melts away - with a 20 foot elevation in the sea level you are looking at hundreds of millions of displaced people. The global community can't even handle a refugee crisis of 100,000 people, let alone 100 million people. The disease and death will be astronomical.
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: zephyrprime
Legendkiller, your argument is weak. It prevents a strawman argument because you say that the other side says that "the earth was never warmer in the past" but in reality, the other side has never claimed that. Nobody has ever claimed that.
Everyone knows and accepts that the earth has had periods of cold and warmth and this isn't the hottest period in history by a longshot.
So there you go.
Also, there were no oceans in the midwest tens of thousands of years ago. That was tens of millions of years ago. Back when pangaea broke up, the north america plate started subducting the pacific plate and eventually, all the western and midwestern states were lifted out of the seabed where they had been before.
The claim is that we have deviated outside the mean, but we really haven't. The other side says that humans are impacting the environment, causing global warming. How can they extrapolate human effects when we are at a peak right now? Just because it's warmer than the past peak doesn't mean that *WE* caused that. Correlation does not infer causation.
Same arguement used for not banning CFCs.
