• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

An asteroid almost hit Earth today

SAWYER

Lifer
A 200-foot wide asteroid zoomed past Earth today at an altitude of 40,000 miles - swerving far enough from our planet to avoid total destruction, officials said.

Dubbed 2009 DD45, the large rock was discovered only Friday by Australian astronomers.

The enormous asteroid narrowly avoided a collision with Earth at 8:44 EST, officials said.

Although 40,000 miles sounds like a safe distance, it's only about one-seventh of the way to the moon and less than twice as far out as most satellites, astronomers said.

Had 2009 DD45 slammed down onto the Earth, it would have exploded with the force of a large nuclear blast somewhere in the Pacific Ocean west of Tahiti.

Astronomers said the asteroid is likely to return for another series of near misses since it's somehow drawn in by our planet's gravity.

Peter Brown, an astronomer at the University of Western Ontario in Canada, said the last rock "as large or larger than this to come this close was in 1973 and the next time will be in 2029 when Apophis makes its close approach."

Apophis initially caused some concern among scientists when its plotted course revealed it to be on a collision trajectory with Earth, but further investigations have since shown it will pass harmlessly by.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/03...isses_earth_157694.htm
 
200 foot wide? Seriously, we've set of a number of nuclear bombs in the last 50 years. What are we looking at, damage wise, from a mere 200 foot asteroid hitting in the ocean? Probably some tsunamis and devestation of islands, likely some coastal damage. Doubt we'd see any serious loss of life along coastal areas. There'd be enough lead time at that point for an evacuation.
 
Not a huge problem. That's comparable to the one that exploded over Siberia. It's the strength of a nuke, but minus the radiation. I'm thinking massive tsunamis, and any boats or islands below the path would be pretty much fucked.
 
Originally posted by: Bateluer
200 foot wide? Seriously, we've set of a number of nuclear bombs in the last 50 years. What are we looking at, damage wise, from a mere 200 foot asteroid hitting in the ocean? Probably some tsunamis and devestation of islands, likely some coastal damage. Doubt we'd see any serious loss of life along coastal areas. There'd be enough lead time at that point for an evacuation.

Yeah how would a 200 foot rock cause a nuclear explosion. B S
 
Originally posted by: Quintox
Originally posted by: Bateluer
200 foot wide? Seriously, we've set of a number of nuclear bombs in the last 50 years. What are we looking at, damage wise, from a mere 200 foot asteroid hitting in the ocean? Probably some tsunamis and devestation of islands, likely some coastal damage. Doubt we'd see any serious loss of life along coastal areas. There'd be enough lead time at that point for an evacuation.

Yeah how would a 200 foot rock cause a nuclear explosion. B S

A lot of it would disintegrate. Not even sure it would cause much damage if it hits some unpopulated area or falls in an ocean.
 
Originally posted by: Quintox
Originally posted by: Bateluer
200 foot wide? Seriously, we've set of a number of nuclear bombs in the last 50 years. What are we looking at, damage wise, from a mere 200 foot asteroid hitting in the ocean? Probably some tsunamis and devestation of islands, likely some coastal damage. Doubt we'd see any serious loss of life along coastal areas. There'd be enough lead time at that point for an evacuation.

Yeah how would a 200 foot rock cause a nuclear explosion. B S

I think they're saying that the impact would be similar, as far as initial destruction is concerned.

And that rock isn't any old 200 foot wide rock. That rock is MOVING.
 
Originally posted by: Quintox
Originally posted by: Bateluer
200 foot wide? Seriously, we've set of a number of nuclear bombs in the last 50 years. What are we looking at, damage wise, from a mere 200 foot asteroid hitting in the ocean? Probably some tsunamis and devestation of islands, likely some coastal damage. Doubt we'd see any serious loss of life along coastal areas. There'd be enough lead time at that point for an evacuation.

Yeah how would a 200 foot rock cause a nuclear explosion. B S

because of its velocity
 
There's always an Arquillian Battle Cruiser, or a Corillian Death Ray, or an intergalactic plague that is about to wipe out all life on this miserable little planet, and the only way these people can get on with their happy lives is that they Do... Not... Know about it!
 
I think the main problem is the massive amount of debris that would be put into the atmosphere after an impact like that.
 
Originally posted by: NL5
I think the main problem is the massive amount of debris that would be put into the atmosphere after an impact like that.

It's not that big, and the ocean is pretty deep.
 
Originally posted by: Quintox
Originally posted by: Bateluer
200 foot wide? Seriously, we've set of a number of nuclear bombs in the last 50 years. What are we looking at, damage wise, from a mere 200 foot asteroid hitting in the ocean? Probably some tsunamis and devestation of islands, likely some coastal damage. Doubt we'd see any serious loss of life along coastal areas. There'd be enough lead time at that point for an evacuation.

Yeah how would a 200 foot rock cause a nuclear explosion. B S

It doesn't cause a nuclear explosion. It would release a similar amount of energy to a nuclear explosion.

According to this site, an impact would have been near 1 megaton. (I assumed dense rock, 17 km/sec)
 
Originally posted by: flunky nassau
Had that slammed into the Pacific, I would have been fucked.

<--- from Bay Area, CA.

I highly doubt it. By the time it got to you it would probably be a few ankle high waves.
 
Originally posted by: Bateluer
200 foot wide? Seriously, we've set of a number of nuclear bombs in the last 50 years. What are we looking at, damage wise, from a mere 200 foot asteroid hitting in the ocean? Probably some tsunamis and devestation of islands, likely some coastal damage. Doubt we'd see any serious loss of life along coastal areas. There'd be enough lead time at that point for an evacuation.

200ft wide slamming into the ocean would probably, definitely send some tsunamis to all the coasts, can't make a guess how big though. They say half of an island in the Canary Island chain, if it broke off of the island itself and slid into the ocean, would cause would could potentially be a tsunami hundreds of feet tall by the time it hit the US East Coast.
200ft would be far smaller than that, but have far more energy than a large chunk of island, already at sea level, falling into the ocean.

If that 200ft wide hit land? Probably something to the tune of the Tunguska Event. Granted, that event was an explosion above land, estimated a couple miles above, and not a direct strike on land. But basically, that size would destroy a large city area, maybe one of our smaller state's in size, with a crater maybe a mile across, and potentially up to 2.5 MT of destructive energy, about 150 times that of the Hiroshima bomb.

Wiki has this quote, but it's not cited
The blast and thermal energy released by the impact would certainly have been lethal to living creatures within a wide area. All life within a radius of three to four kilometers (1.9-2.5 miles) would have been killed immediately. The impact produced a fireball hot enough to cause severe flash burns at a range of up to 10 km (7 miles). A shock wave moving out at 2,000 km/h (1,200 mph) leveled everything within a radius of 14-22 km (8.5-13.5 miles), dissipating to hurricane-force winds that persisted to a radius of 40 km (25 miles)
Barringer Meteor Crater.

They estimate that impact was from a slighter smaller, but very dense object.
 
The scariest part is that apparently it was only spotted a few days ago. It's kind of crazy that an asteroid large enough to wipe us out could be on the way and we might not notice it until days or weeks before it was supposed to hit.

Another site mentioned that it was about the same size as the one responsible for the explosion at Tunguska.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event
 
Originally posted by: MotF Bane
Originally posted by: NL5
I think the main problem is the massive amount of debris that would be put into the atmosphere after an impact like that.

It's not that big, and the ocean is pretty deep.

and it's moving really really fast.

kinetic energy = 0.5 * mass * velocity^2
the mass is big, but the velocity is even bigger. big times bigger-squared equals earth-changing.
 
I don't want to close my eyes, I don't want to fall asleep.
 
Originally posted by: MotF Bane
Originally posted by: NL5
I think the main problem is the massive amount of debris that would be put into the atmosphere after an impact like that.

It's not that big, and the ocean is pretty deep.

Not really. The ocean is what 1-2 km deep over most of it? When the asteroid is moving at 20 km/s that's less than 0.1 seconds to get through it.
 
Originally posted by: Quintox
Originally posted by: Bateluer
200 foot wide? Seriously, we've set of a number of nuclear bombs in the last 50 years. What are we looking at, damage wise, from a mere 200 foot asteroid hitting in the ocean? Probably some tsunamis and devestation of islands, likely some coastal damage. Doubt we'd see any serious loss of life along coastal areas. There'd be enough lead time at that point for an evacuation.

Yeah how would a 200 foot rock cause a nuclear explosion. B S

OMG REED BOOOKS AN U KIN FIND OUT.
 
Back
Top