Americans Unready to Revolt, Despite Revolting Conditions

Specop 007

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2005
9,454
0
0
I was suprised to see any journalist write an article discussing revolution.

But it makes me wonder, how many members here would fight in a revolution? I'm by no means saying lets go revolt, but seriously how many here would pick up a rifle and overthrow the government? Do you think conditions would exist where we would ever truly see a revolution in this country?

I dont think we will ever see another revolution in this country whether or not we "need" one.

Thoughts?

Article

Americans Unready to Revolt, Despite Revolting Conditions
Joel S. Hirschhorn

June 15, 2007
The latest NBC/Wall Street Journal national poll results vividly show a population incredibly dissatisfied with their nation?s political system. In other countries in other times such a depressing level of confidence in government would send a signal to those running the government that a major upheaval is imminent. But not here in the USA. Why?

First, here are the highlights of the poll that surveyed 1,008 adults from June 8-11, with a margin of error of plus-minus 3.1 percentage points.

A whopping 68 percent think the country is on the wrong track. Just 19 percent believe the country is headed in the right direction - the lowest number on that question in nearly 15 years. And most of those with the positive view are probably in the Upper Class.

Bush?s approval rating is at just 29 percent, his lowest mark ever in the survey. Only 62 percent of Republicans approve, versus 32 percent who disapprove. Take Republicans out of the picture and a fifth or less of Americans have a positive view of Bush.

Even worse, only 23 percent approve of the job that Congress is doing. So much for that wonderful new Democratic control of Congress. Bipartisan incompetence is alive and well.

On the economic front, nearly twice as many people think the U.S. is more hurt than helped by the global economy (48 to 25 percent). Globalization does not spread wealth; it channels it to the wealthy, making billionaires out of millionaires.

I have long asserted that Americans live in a delusional democracy with delusional prosperity and these and loads of other data support this view. There is a super wealthy and politically powerful Upper Class that is literally raping the nation. Meanwhile, the huge Lower Class continues to lose economic ground while their elected representatives sell them out to benefit the Upper Class. Yet no rational person thinks that a large fraction of the population is ready to rise up in revolt against the evil status quo political-economic system that so clearly is not serving the interests of the overwhelming majority of Americans. Why not?

For a nation that was built on a revolt against oppressive governance by the British, something has been lost from our political DNA. We apparently no longer have the gene for political rebellion. It has been bred out of most of us. And those of us that urge a Second American Revolution are seen as fringe, nutty subversives.

Part of the genius of our contemporary ruling class elites is that they have engineering a state of political and economic oppression that paradoxically is still embraced by the Lower Class. The rational way to understand this is that ordinary, oppressed Americans are in a deep psychological state of self-delusion. Despite all the empirical, objective evidence of a failed government, they fail to see rebellion opportunities. Many still believe they live in the world?s best democracy. But across all elections considerably less than half the citizens even bother to vote anymore. Yet, as the new NBC/Journal poll results show, people are cognitively aware of just how awful the political-economic system is. Yet they are not feeling enough pain to seriously consider rebellion. And it is visceral pain that must drive people to the daring act of rebellion.


Why is there insufficient pain for revolution? This is a deadly serious issue. What is historically unique about America is that even the most oppressed and unfairly treated people are distracted by affordable materialism, entertainment, sports, gambling, and myriad other aspects of our frivolous, self-absorbed culture. Even failed school and health care systems do not drive people, paying enormous sums to fill up their SUVs, to rebellion. So, Americans are aware of their oppression, but the power elites have successfully drugged them with a plethora of pleasure-producing distractions sufficient to keep them under control. We are free to bitch, but too weak to revolt. The Internet has provided a release valve for some pent up anger and frustration. But it too has mostly become another source of distraction, rather than an effective tool for rebellion.

Though these new poll statistics make news, those in control of the political-economic system are not afraid that the population is on the verge of retaking their constitutionally guaranteed sovereign power and take back their nation. Thousands of people like me keep writing books and articles and creating protest groups and events. Those in power just find new, ingenious ways to keep the population distracted ? if not through pleasure, then certainly through fear of terrorism. Growing economic insecurity also contributes to self-paralysis, as do never-ending political lies.

What a system.

Even as the population has growing awareness of the dire condition of their nation, the move by the politically powerful on the right and left continues to seek a new immigration law that will solidify the selling out of America. Business interests want more of those fleeing Mexico and other nations to keep wages low. Instead of Mexicans rising up in rebellion against their oppressive government and economic system they escape to the USA. But Americans have no such viable escape solution. Though global warming will certainly make Canada increasingly attractive.

So what do Americans have ? other than a terribly bleak future? Where is hope in our dismal world?

In a bizarre twist of history that further illustrates just how impotent Americans have become, virtually all citizens are either unaware of or unreceptive to the ultimate escape route that the Framers of our Constitution gave us. They anticipated that Americans could become quite dissatisfied with the federal government. They feared that the political system could become incredibly corrupted by moneyed interests. They were right.


So here we sit over 200 years after our nation was created unwilling to use what is explicitly given to us in Article V of the Constitution ? the option to have a convention outside the control of Congress, the President and the Supreme Court to make proposals for constitutional amendments. Do we really believe in the rule of law? If so, then we should understand that the supreme law of the land ? what is in our Constitution ? is the ultimate way to obtain the deep political and government reforms to restore true democracy and economic fairness to our society.

Make no mistake: an Article V convention has been stubbornly opposed by virtually all groups with political and economic power. This is most evidenced by the blatant refusal of Congress to obey the Constitution and give us an Article V convention, even though the single explicit requirement for a convention has been met. This fact alone should tell rational people that they are being screwed and oppressed. The rule of law is trumped by the rule of delusion. Our lawmakers are lawbreakers.

Come learn more about the effort to get an Article V convention at www.foavc.org and become a member. Do not keep witnessing the unraveling of American society, voting for lesser evil candidates, and believing the propaganda that putting different Democrats or Republicans in office will actually improve things for most of us. Choose peaceful rebellion by using what our Constitution gives us. Fight self-delusion.

[Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy (www.delusionaldemocracy.com); and a founder of Friends of the Article V Convention (www.foavc.org).]
 

child of wonder

Diamond Member
Aug 31, 2006
8,307
176
106
Americans are so apathetic that I think the government and big corporations are learning they can get away with more and more and the general populace will do nothing.
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
Because after a person finishes that article and things objectively about their life, realizing that their longevity, personal wealth, job, and other freedoms far exceed those afforded most of the planet, they wonder what the heck the point would be.

Anyway, there is no need for an armed revolt. There are presidential candidates such as ron paul running on a platform of vast changes, but people do not want them, so if they can peacefully get their way and don't, why pick up a rifle?
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
If you want a quick and dirty idea why, consider Maslow's hierarchy of needs: as technology has led to high productivity, most Americans have their basic needs for food and shelter met. That's a change from the days of starvation over political problems.

That may be a reason why Americans have *opinions* that are ripe for revolt, but they can't be bothered.

Bread and Circuses... not a recent invention. Look at our own history - thw two periods we had 'progressive' revolt, the Progressive eras after the turn of the century, and the New Deal after the great depression, were both triggered by pretty catastrophic situations for most Americans. That's what it took just to get some basic reformcs that we think of as very moderate today passwed.

Remember, only a minority of Americans supported even the revolutinary war, supported entering WWI, or WWII as Hitler spent years gaining Europe until Pearl Harbor, the first Iraq war until propaganda lies had enough front page coverage to shift opinion, and so on.

No, we're living in an era of corruption; it's funny how we and the Chinese are moving towards the same point, a society of economic inequality with a weatlhy corporate class who the masses do little about politically, from opposite sides. Look no further than the thread attacking Al Gore for fine examples of how our citizens are often part of the cause.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
The fact is that most democracies modeled after the US constitution have failed on those very points. Right now corporate dominance of national life rivals the conditions of the 1890's. And we got many reforms being finally being totally dismantled in the past few years. And the Great depression of the 1930's could have been another trigger to collapse
our national framework---and for all the conservative hatred of FDR--he saved the system from being swept away in MHO.

And now the American people will likely come up with new reforms to toss neocon ideas into the trash bin of history---all our constitutions has to do is fail once and its game over.
We rallied around our constitution and gave Nixon the boot in 1974---I sadly don't see that we are made of that same stuff now. But I think national reality will teach us, we can't afford to maintain a national military that allows others nations to under price us in world markets.

The pendulum of history always lags---first you have the abuses---20 or so years later you get the reforms.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
Simply put, people aren't that unhappy with their situation. Most people in America earn a wage that they can live on, most people are free from major governmental oppression. (warrantless wiretapping, etc. are certainly unamerican/unconstitutional/illegal but even I recognize that they aren't exactly Tienanmen Square) More then anything though, people here believe in our type of government. If we were to overthrow the current order, what would we replace it with? Is there a reason to believe it would be something better then the current system?

Also, that author's take on polling numbers is asinine. Just because you don't like the president, globalization, or think the country is on the right track at the current time doesn't mean that you do want or even should want to violently overthrow the government, because it in no way measures the level of individual distaste. If you think the country is 51% on the wrong track, that's a lot different then 100% on the wrong track, yet both would merit a "yes" in that survey.

Let's be honest, while there are a lot of things we don't like about America, overall it's a pretty good place to live. Why would we want to destroy that?
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
The problem is, Eskimospy, that that logic leads to things being a lot worse than they should be, because power will always take all it can until people fight it.

Analogously, it's like living under the mafia; most people aren't terribly hurt by it, they just pay some money or higher prices, and rationalize it, because the few who try to do something are made examples of. It's a lot easier for people to ignore the issue than to try to form the movement, in which people will be killed, to do something about it.

The mafia then pushed things to the line where the public has some people battling the mafia and getting killed, but not so many that the mafia's power is threatened. That's the balance that gets set up, and it's pretty bad compared to how things should be set up.

It's the same in any control situation; in WWII, the Nazis tried to keep the French people behaving by using the huge number of French prisoners they had, releasing more of them for good behavior by the French people, and punishing them for bad behavior. They tried to make it a lot easier to not battle the Nazi occupation than to battle it. It largely worked, as it usually does.

Think about it - the US government could get away with a lot, including the imprisonment and killing of some political opponents, before the American people would literally 'take to arms' to try to stop it. If that were the way the policies were set, we'd have terrible things going on. Policies have to be set a long way from where the people revolt.

And that requires, as our founding fathers said, 'eternal vigilance' by the people not to put up with the abuses.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: Specop 007
I was suprised to see any journalist write an article discussing revolution.

But it makes me wonder, how many members here would fight in a revolution?

We have the power to have a "revolution" at the ballot box (theoretically at least).

If people can't be bothered to vote, do you think they could be bothered to grab weapons and march on Washington DC?

If people were actually UNITED in their objectives, we could change things- the means are there. But IMO, we're not united in anything other than our digust for these Wshington DC clowns. I think we're all mad at them for different things. take the immigration bill for example: some are angry the border's not secured, others don't like the points system, others the guest worker program etc. But we (the populace) don't like the compromise. So, we can't agree, we don't wanna compromise - how we gonna unite for a revolution?

And I mean REALLY, who would we install after we overthrew this bunch? I see no way to agree on that either.

Fern
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
The bottom line is while people are displeased it isnt that bad, honestly. Anybody who has done some traveling around world will know there arent many places better to live than this country. I think most people understand this and wouldnt revolt because of that.

 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
why revolt when there are elections every two years?

I think something crazy bad would have to happen to inspire a revolt, like conditions worse than the depression or a president trying to turn himself into a Caesar.
 

keird

Diamond Member
Jan 18, 2002
3,714
9
81
This quoted article lost it's credibility at,

"The rational way to understand this is that ordinary, oppressed Americans are in a deep psychological state of self-delusion."

I think that is a false statement and misapplied logic.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,288
136
Originally posted by: Craig234
The problem is, Eskimospy, that that logic leads to things being a lot worse than they should be, because power will always take all it can until people fight it.

Analogously, it's like living under the mafia; most people aren't terribly hurt by it, they just pay some money or higher prices, and rationalize it, because the few who try to do something are made examples of. It's a lot easier for people to ignore the issue than to try to form the movement, in which people will be killed, to do something about it.

The mafia then pushed things to the line where the public has some people battling the mafia and getting killed, but not so many that the mafia's power is threatened. That's the balance that gets set up, and it's pretty bad compared to how things should be set up.

It's the same in any control situation; in WWII, the Nazis tried to keep the French people behaving by using the huge number of French prisoners they had, releasing more of them for good behavior by the French people, and punishing them for bad behavior. They tried to make it a lot easier to not battle the Nazi occupation than to battle it. It largely worked, as it usually does.

Think about it - the US government could get away with a lot, including the imprisonment and killing of some political opponents, before the American people would literally 'take to arms' to try to stop it. If that were the way the policies were set, we'd have terrible things going on. Policies have to be set a long way from where the people revolt.

And that requires, as our founding fathers said, 'eternal vigilance' by the people not to put up with the abuses.

An important point though is that there is no particularly good reason to believe that what we would replace our current government with would be any better. When you're revolting against genocidal Nazis, you've got a pretty good chance that what you end up with on the other side will be an improvement. That's not so in this case.

There are a lot of things that I don't like about America, but considering the enormous cost in both lives, chaos, and economic catastrophe that would likely result from a revolution, I simply don't think things in America come close to being bad enough for me to endorse that. There are many ways to fight abuses of power other then violent overthrow, and luckily our system of government has many of those protections built into it. I'll agree that right now they are functioning rather poorly against an out of control executive, but things in government tend to move slowly.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: Specop 007
I was suprised to see any journalist write an article discussing revolution.

But it makes me wonder, how many members here would fight in a revolution?

We have the power to have a "revolution" at the ballot box (theoretically at least).

If people can't be bothered to vote, do you think they could be bothered to grab weapons and march on Washington DC?

If people were actually UNITED in their objectives, we could change things- the means are there. But IMO, we're not united in anything other than our digust for these Wshington DC clowns. I think we're all mad at them for different things. take the immigration bill for example: some are angry the border's not secured, others don't like the points system, others the guest worker program etc. But we (the populace) don't like the compromise. So, we can't agree, we don't wanna compromise - how we gonna unite for a revolution?

And I mean REALLY, who would we install after we overthrew this bunch? I see no way to agree on that either.

Fern

:thumbsup:

You are exactly right. Who would we install? How exactly would this person get the the majority of the country behind him/her without overthrowing him/her? And what about the military?

*shrug* I *do* believe Americans, in general, are complacent. That said, most Americans know that our system, flaws included, is the best around. I always think of stories my wife tells me about the Philippines. Now, they are a "Democratic" government ('scuse me while I cough), but every election year candidates freely solicit voters to vote for them - by offering $$$ in exhcange for their vote. Here's some money, we'll take your vote right now for me, and we'll drop it in the ballot box on election day. Another example, and one I have witnessed first hand, is it is a given ANY polititian, including police and judges, can be bought. ANY. I know so many examples of this.

Anyway. Sure we have our issues, and our disagreements. But all in all theyre pretty insignificant. With few exceptions there really isnt any trends right now that will break the good 'ol US of A.
 

Zedtom

Platinum Member
Nov 23, 2001
2,146
0
0
The idea of a massive reorganization of our system of government is an attractive idea to the majority of individuals who take an active interest in politics. The process involved in achieving that dream varies from a conservative approach of working for change within the system by electing innovative leaders all the way to revolution and a complete change of government.

I personally would like to see a constitutional convention to redesign archaic aspects of our system of government. This would be a long, drawn-out political fight but would eventually lead to some reforms.

The alternative of open rebellion does not excite me. Our power structure is designed to repress active revolt. The government would institute martial law, the military would enforce order and control movement, and the utility companies would be nationalized.

The prospect of rationed gasoline, electrical blackouts, and restriction of vehicle access to secured areas would deter most rebels. We Americans are too spoiled to do without our lavish lifestyles.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Originally posted by: Zedtom
The idea of a massive reorganization of our system of government is an attractive idea to the majority of individuals who take an active interest in politics. The process involved in achieving that dream varies from a conservative approach of working for change within the system by electing innovative leaders all the way to revolution and a complete change of government.

I personally would like to see a constitutional convention to redesign archaic aspects of our system of government. This would be a long, drawn-out political fight but would eventually lead to some reforms.

The alternative of open rebellion does not excite me. Our power structure is designed to repress active revolt. The government would institute martial law, the military would enforce order and control movement, and the utility companies would be nationalized.

The prospect of rationed gasoline, electrical blackouts, and restriction of vehicle access to secured areas would deter most rebels. We Americans are too spoiled to do without our lavish lifestyles.

Unfortunately this breaks down to about 5% of the American people. Not exactly a convincing uprising.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Utter crap. There is much wrong in American government today, and much that needs to be done, but there is absolutely no need for violent revolution so long as the economic and democratic freedoms and means are still readily available, which they obviously still are (think about it for just one minute, would we even be discussing this issue on a public internet message board if they weren't?). Public apathy has nothing to do with that, beyond the whining of a few internet would-be dictators unhappy that democracy means that the public doesn't always see things their way.


edit: BTW, it's nice to see Craig finally come out and admit that he's a true marxist-leninist communist (meaning that he supports violent revolution as the best means of acheiving economic equality, this differs from the socialist who is after the same goal but opposed to violence in favor of political reforms). I knew it all along. Heh... I wonder if the OP did this on purpose...
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,778
6,338
126
"Violence" or "Revolution" don't necessarily mean Guns and Bullets. In fact, it doesn't necessarily need/mean violence at all. The Civil Rights movement showed how disruption of the system could affect positive change, but before such a movement can exist it requires a Leader of significant dedication and charisma to get it started. Of course the problem boils down to apathy and the cause of that apathy can be many things.

I think the first thing that needs to be done is to rid yourselves of the Republicans and Democrats. An entrenched 2 Party system is really only slightly better than a single Party system.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: keird
This quoted article lost it's credibility at,

"The rational way to understand this is that ordinary, oppressed Americans are in a deep psychological state of self-delusion."

I think that is a false statement and misapplied logic.

I wouldn't expect any of the resident Republicans to get this one because it is they that are self deluded.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,733
6,758
126
When you feel like the worst person in the world you don't put a lot of faith in the notion it could be better. There is only the impelling certainty, a self fulling prophesy, that things will definitely get worse.
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
very few members here have the balls to do anything worth while, let alone actually fight for anything.
 

bamacre

Lifer
Jul 1, 2004
21,029
2
81
There is no need for a violent revolution, at least yet. :D

The problems with our government are mostly our own damn fault. The fact that we voted for Bush, twice, is proof of that. But it goes much further than Bush. We vote in criminals not just on the federal level, but in our own town and cities. From what I hear, most employees of the Memphis Police department believe our mayor is the city's biggest crack dealer. How messed up is that?

The government only has as much power as we allow it to have, and they suck up as much as we give them. Unfortunately, we allow it to have too much. We don't protest enough, we don't vote well, we don't question, etc., and all that just gives the government more power, and the citizens, less.

It is really unbelieveable how much we have allowed our government to get away with. JFK, Kent State murders, and Iraq is just amazing. At least regarding Vietnam, we were fighting Communism. We weren't fighting terrorists in Iraq until we got there.

Originally posted by: palehorse74
very few members here have the balls to do anything worth while, let alone actually fight for anything.

Just like a little fanatical Republican, always looking to pick up a gun.

If there is ever a revolution in this country, I hope it comes via someone like Gandhi. We have the opportunity to fix things here, and peacefully. It takes a braver person to not fight, to take a punch in the face without fighting back. And in this country, at the current time at least, we have the ability to do it that way. We don't need guns, we need brains. We don't need IED's, we need education. We need courage, poster boards, sit-ins. And unfortunately, we also need leadership, and that is something we lack.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
When you feel like the worst person in the world you don't put a lot of faith in the notion it could be better. There is only the impelling certainty, a self fulling prophesy, that things will definitely get worse.

Why do you always have some kind of weird tangent to batsh!t crazy psychology for explaining everything?