Originally posted by: Vic
How so?
How so? I really don't think you need a lesson on the virtues of saving for the future. Whether it be a rainy day, your dream, or a retirement.
Bear in mind, I don't make any of the "wasteful" purchases here, but that's because I see them as providing poor value to me personally.
That is what the whole article is about. It points out things that people buy, but which might not provide a good value to people who are buying them. Too many people forget to stop and think about the value.If, after, reading the article, people still believe that they are good values, then they should keep buying them.
You made a conscious decision not to spend that much on your wedding. Now you are bashing an article that suggests that people should do exactly what you did: to decide if you are really getting enough value out of what you buy.
And this from the hands of the many to the hands of the "select few rich," WTF is that? Every wedding planner and caterer is rich? Every coffee shop owner, service worker, retail worker, casino security person, sports memorabilia collector/dealer, and car salesman?
No, not every one is rich. But the majority of the purchase there will have a portion of the money listed there are going to the rich. I'm sorry but people who own (stocks or the company outright) businesses mentioned there are not the poorest of America.
I'm not advocating that people spend more than they can or should, or beyond what is prudent, or fail to exercise proper financial judgement and planning. Not at all. But this BS that the media spews that money spent in a fashion they deem for us as improper simply falls into a black hole is just that, total bullsh!t.
This article is just about people spending just what they should. Nothing more. It never said to NOT buy any of those. I'll quote the article. It said go ahead and buy the stuff but first "think about how saving that money might provide a better route to long-term happiness".
Who are you (or the writer of that article) to decide for us?
Again, I never stated that I would decide anything. Please stop reading things into my posts that I don't write. If you have the money, and if you want it, then buy it. But we as a society would be better off if you at least stop to think if there isn't a better value out there that you'll enjoy more. That is all. If people get the most satisisfaction out of their money, then overall, we have done well. What is wrong with advocating that?