Originally posted by: DearQT
Originally posted by: Trygve
I don't know if it has anything to do with "American" or not, but the trend I've seen is for women to be looking to keep living the "romance novel" adventure with someone who's new, exciting, and where the fantasy they have about that person is still stronger in their minds than the reality.
Trouble is, it's pretty much physically impossible for a guy to remain new, exciting, and different indefinitely. Sooner or later, the reality starts to shine through and the world is full of new and exciting fantasies that look much more appealing.
Seriously, DougK and I had a
discussion about this. He thought that I was too demanding for the reasons you gave above. He said people change. Well, you know what crossed my mind but I didn't bother posting: Assuming his theory is true about young girls not wanting to settle until they've kissed a number of guys--
no wonder! There's no way in hell I would like to submit myself to a boring relationship. What is to stop someone from dumping an old lover for a new one if through this process she could always renew the feeling she desired and with little burden?
Why shouldn't I continue to enjoy the affections, courtesy, compliments, respect, flowers, help, care and other things? I would hope to maintain the same attitude toward him, so why can't he do the same? Really though, isn't a relationship also about sacrifices? I may not feel too good, but I love and respect someone enough to go out of my way to make sure he enjoys what he's earned. Why must these things stop suddenly? And if they must stop, what is to stop me from leaving for a new relationship where my deeds and feelings (emotional, physical, and spiritual) are reciprocated? I understand that things change (e.g., aging, babies, bills to pay), but it shouldn't stop the love from flowing in action. It should only make people change the way they do just a
few things--not most or everything. I think often than not, it's just plain laziness and getting too comfortable (i.e., interpreting comfort as having no obligations anymore). Really, I don't see the benefit of a relationship if all either of us gets from it is stress, no time for the other person, no affections etc. He isn't my family member--he's my lover or spouse. It should stay that way. I would much rather not commit myself to a
particular man if it can't be that way. Call it idealism or romanticism, but that's what I want and expect--a mutual feeling, understanding, respect, courtesy and a display of affections.