• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

American Student Scarred In Brutal Sharia Attack In London

Status
Not open for further replies.
A US student visiting London, England was attacked by a group of radical Islamists for drinking alcohol. The group didn't like him in their area and that he was drinking alcohol when they decided to brutally beat him and slash him with a beer bottle. The student is now scarred permanently.

The police claimed it was because he wasn't local but there have been sharia patrols before. They attacked him because he was drinking alcohol in a Muslim area.

The BBC and HuffPost both claim it was Asian gangs but they are wrong since other sources show it a Muslim gang. These attacks are going to continue to happen and there will be more sharia patrols. There are already no-go areas in England and it will get worse.

This is again the failure of multiculturalism and refusing to address radical Islam. Unless this is addressed then England will become even worse than it is now.

The thugs responsible need to be locked up and kicked out of the country. Do you agree they should be locked up and England must address the issue of these radicals?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-24635343

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...l-mob-attack-caught-CCTV-days-arrived-UK.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmRoMAo47tY

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...hed-in-london-police-eye-muslims-patrols.html


Once again, the OP makes a bigoted anti-Muslim thread. The first two of his links never even mention the word Muslim; his last link hints that it occurred near an area where there was a problem before related to Muslims - but, it appears that the OP seized on this to make another extraordinary claim. Usually, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; OP has provided zero evidence. It's been refuted by another poster in this thread with 3 sources generally perceived to be reasonable. Should it be demonstrated that there's truth to the OP, it'll be unlocked.-Admin DrPizza
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is absolutely nothing to support what Daily Beast is claiming. They misrepresent statements of police claiming they are calling on the muslim community to help bring these people to justice when the officer they claim made the statement said nothing of the sort.

But all the others must be wrong who stated they were Asian, possibly Bengali, including the police.
 
The guy was drinking in a sharia controlled zone, what did he expect?

Why should there be any religious controlled zone in England? 😕

Since you asked, sharia controlled zones have been going on for several years now,

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...xtremists-set-Sharia-law-zones-UK-cities.html

Reports are the next step would be violence to enforce sharia zones in london.

http://news.asiaone.com/News/Latest+News/World/Story/A1Story20130125-397975.html

I asked WHY should there be an religious, not that are there any.
There should not be in an open religion country.

The locals should not tolerate such and the law should step in if there is any indication.
Apparently, the law enforcement has been crippled by religious tolerance.
 
I asked WHY should there be an religious, not that are there any.
There should not be in an open religion country.

Why?

Because radical islam wishes to impose its will upon others.

The same thing is happening in Australia, France, Sweden,,,,. Its called creeping sharia.
 
The guy was drinking in a sharia controlled zone, what did he expect?

Why are you choosing to believe a highly inflammatory version of the incident, promulgated by master-troll Incorruptible, which may well be completely incorrect, before all of the facts are known?
 
I asked WHY should there be an religious, not that are there any.
There should not be in an open religion country.

The locals should not tolerate such and the law should step in if there is any indication.
Apparently, the law enforcement has been crippled by religious tolerance.

Do you not even care about what the actual truth might be about this incident before jumping to conclusions like this?
 
Another American who thinks American laws apply to him wherever he goes? Color me shocked.

The Shari "law" should not apply to an area in a non-religious preference country.

When going to a Muslim country; alcohol is verboten. USe it, display it and take your chances

In England, it is not; religion should not prevent it in a public area.
 
Last edited:
Do you not even care about what the actual truth might be about this incident before jumping to conclusions like this?

And what is the actual truth?

There have been multiple incidents where the law enforcement has ignored the law of their land to appease the Muslim religious community.
 
BBC is wrong because indigestible says so. Fuck you indigestible, you bigoted little child.

With his wanton disregard for the process of determining what is and isn't true, I can see him in earlier times being the effective leader of a lynch mob.
 
And what is the actual truth?

There have been multiple incidents where the law enforcement has ignored the law of their land to appease the Muslim religious community.

I don't know. And neither do you. Do you really lack the self-discipline to wait until the facts are known about this case?
 
Do you not even care about what the actual truth might be about this incident before jumping to conclusions like this?

The truth is what you believe it to be.


I don't know. And neither do you. Do you really lack the self-discipline to wait until the facts are known about this case?

You know what lack of facts means?

It means you can make up any crap you want, just like what the news media does.
 
I don't know. And neither do you. Do you really lack the self-discipline to wait until the facts are known about this case?

The Muslim community in England seems to be acting like the duck.

Way to many issues to ignore their attitudes/intolerance toward infidels and non-conformists within their own.
 
The Muslim community in England seems to be acting like the duck.

Way to many issues to ignore their attitudes/intolerance toward infidels and non-conformists within their own.

You do realize at this particular minute, they believe it was a group of Asians in their late teens and early 20's. Well at least, BBC and Huffpo do, but you know how biased the BBC can be 🙄
 
You do realize at this particular minute, they believe it was a group of Asians in their late teens and early 20's. Well at least, BBC and Huffpo do, but you know how biased the BBC can be 🙄

Well them and the police actually investigating the matter. But what do they know. Right wing website says otherwise.
 
For the idiots saying it's an Asian gang show me the Hindus, Sikhs and Asians in the attack. I am sure you can find them just like the idiots found them in the case of the so called "Asian" rape gangs.

Remember when I created the thread on sharia patrols and these idiots attacked me only for a short time later I was proven right.

The guy was attacked in an area with a large Muslim population who felt he didn't belong there.
 
The Shari "law" should not apply to an area in a non-religious preference country.

When going to a Muslim country; alcohol is verboten. USe it, display it and take your chances

In England, it is not; religion should not prevent it in a public area.

What *should* be and what *is* are two very different things. Fact is, England tolerates Sharia law to the point they allow areas to be controlled by it. The fact this guy thought it didnt apply to him was his mistake.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top