American INjustice System Hard at work - Georgia: 12 Yr old cold blooded kills 8 yr old and it is not even a Felony

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Georgia - Load a Screensaver, face 120 Years Prison, strangle an 8 yr old girl, get a slap on the wrist.

4-29-2004 Suspect to be Tried as a Juvenile

District Attorney Pete Skandalakis said he had no choice under Georgia law but to try the boy as a juvenile. State law says a person may only be tried as an adult if he is at least 13 years old.

"There is no option. There's nothing available to us without the law being changed," Skandalakis said.

The law also does not consider murder a felony for juvenile suspects. Consequently, if the suspect is convicted, he would serve a maximum of two years.

The family ?cannot comprehend why in Georgia someone charged with murder would only be subject to a two-year penalty,? he said. ?They didn?t say they wanted a maximum penalty of life in prison, but they could not understand how it could only be a two-year penalty.?

The boy was described as a home-schooled child who bummed cigarettes from neighbors and was known for causing disturbances along with a couple of teenagers in the Twin Oaks Mobile Home Park. They sometimes stole things or broke into vacant mobile homes, neighbors said.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4-29-2004 Woman, 97, Handcuffed Over Ticket

HIGHLAND PARK, Texas ? Police say they had no choice but to go by the book when they handcuffed a 97-year-old woman and took her to jail for failing to pay a traffic ticket.

"All of our enthusiasm should be tempered with judgment, and therein lies my problem with this, and basically Mother's problem with it, too," he said.

Her other son, David, is a state district judge. He said it would be inappropriate for him to discuss the arrest.
 
Jan 12, 2003
3,498
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Georgia - Load a Screensaver, face 120 Years Prison, strangle an 8 yr old girl, get a slap on the wrist.

I wish you would bring a copy of your 'DNC Spin-Meister Guide' up here for me to read...you, sir, have a future in politics :)
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: dmcowen674

Georgia - Load a Screensaver, face 120 Years Prison, strangle an 8 yr old girl, get a slap on the wrist.

I wish you would bring a copy of your 'DNC Spin-Meister Guide' up here for me to read...you, sir, have a future in politics :)

Funny you mention that. I was seriously considering signing papers at the Secretary Of State Office to run for a State Representative position. Qualifying ends tomorrow.

It's a $400 application Fee and we are already Economically strapped so not going to do it.

If I did do it, there is no doubt I would most likely be labeled as the poorest Politician in America.
 

Rastus

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
4,704
3
0
Police say they had no choice but to go by the book when they handcuffed a 97-year-old woman and took her to jail for failing to pay a traffic ticket

All police departments have a policy that they handcuff everybody they arrest. I had a friend that was a deputy in a small town in the '70's. He got beat up by a little old lady when he arrested her and didn't handcuff her when he was transporting her.
 

totalcommand

Platinum Member
Apr 21, 2004
2,487
0
0
If you think a 12 year old should be able to be tried as an adult for murder, a 12 year old should be able to vote in elections. The reason a 12 year old cannot be tried as an adult is because it is assumed that he/she has not fully developed as a moral human being. And this is the same reason that a 12 year old cannot vote in an election. As for the 97-yearold, it has been generally decided that anybody after the age of 16 has the moral sense to know that failing to follow a traffic ticket is wrong. Where would you propose the cutoff for giving a ticket to be? 100 years old? 99? 98? 97? How do you decide? How about a 20 year old?
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: totalcommand
If you think a 12 year old should be able to be tried as an adult for murder, a 12 year old should be able to vote in elections. The reason a 12 year old cannot be tried as an adult is because it is assumed that he/she has not fully developed as a moral human being. And this is the same reason that a 12 year old cannot vote in an election. As for the 97-yearold, it has been generally decided that anybody after the age of 16 has the moral sense to know that failing to follow a traffic ticket is wrong. Where would you propose the cutoff for giving a ticket to be? 100 years old? 99? 98? 97? How do you decide? How about a 20 year old?

No one said that you cannot give a ticket to the 97 yr old. Simply that the cuffs were not neccessary for failure to pay said ticket.

No one is saying neccessarilly that the 12 year old be considered an adult. Just don't let that 12 year old out of custody in 2 years and with no record of what he had done.

That "child" will be and "adult" to look out for in very few short years.


Edit: This 12 year old already had a history of stealing, vandilizing and bums cigarettes. An obvious product of zero adult supervision and "Trailer Park Trash".

This occured in a Trailer Park BTW.
 

Spagina

Senior member
Dec 31, 2000
565
0
0
Anyone who knowingly committed murder, especially strangling someone to death, needs to be REMOVED from society, especially if they began at such a young age. Look right here folks, this is the next serial killer for the new generation slipping through our fingers.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: totalcommand
If you think a 12 year old should be able to be tried as an adult for murder, a 12 year old should be able to vote in elections. The reason a 12 year old cannot be tried as an adult is because it is assumed that he/she has not fully developed as a moral human being. And this is the same reason that a 12 year old cannot vote in an election. As for the 97-yearold, it has been generally decided that anybody after the age of 16 has the moral sense to know that failing to follow a traffic ticket is wrong. Where would you propose the cutoff for giving a ticket to be? 100 years old? 99? 98? 97? How do you decide? How about a 20 year old?

Not being able to make an educated decision when voting, which most don't do anyways, is just a tad different than murdering someone. I don't care how old he is, he should be in prison for the rest of his life.
 

joshw10

Senior member
Feb 16, 2004
806
0
0
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: totalcommand
If you think a 12 year old should be able to be tried as an adult for murder, a 12 year old should be able to vote in elections. The reason a 12 year old cannot be tried as an adult is because it is assumed that he/she has not fully developed as a moral human being. And this is the same reason that a 12 year old cannot vote in an election. As for the 97-yearold, it has been generally decided that anybody after the age of 16 has the moral sense to know that failing to follow a traffic ticket is wrong. Where would you propose the cutoff for giving a ticket to be? 100 years old? 99? 98? 97? How do you decide? How about a 20 year old?

Not being able to make an educated decision when voting, which most don't do anyways, is just a tad different than murdering someone. I don't care how old he is, he should be in prison for the rest of his life.

So what should the age be? 12? 10? 4? You think for what this kid did at age 12, he should be in prison for the rest of his life? Possibly in 60, 70 years still alive and in prison? Here's my idea. You should not be sentenced for a period longer than you have been alive. That would mean this kid could spend a maximum of 12 years in jail, getting out at 24. Sounds fair to me for murder at his age.

But anyway sending him to prison will probably make him more likely to commit crimes once he's released. Yeah, take a juvenile criminal and stick him with a bunch of experienced criminals for many years. Then let him out. That'll work...
 

bozack

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2000
7,913
12
81
Originally posted by: joshw10
So what should the age be? 12? 10? 4? You think for what this kid did at age 12, he should be in prison for the rest of his life? Possibly in 60, 70 years still alive and in prison? Here's my idea. You should not be sentenced for a period longer than you have been alive. That would mean this kid could spend a maximum of 12 years in jail, getting out at 24. Sounds fair to me for murder at his age.

But anyway sending him to prison will probably make him more likely to commit crimes once he's released. Yeah, take a juvenile criminal and stick him with a bunch of experienced criminals for many years. Then let him out. That'll work...

they should atleast have a public record of it...it is murder no matter what the age.