• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

America to join cyber operations with ... Russia

cytg111

cytg111

Lifer
We heard the unthinkable first time @Helsinki .. and now here it is.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1185012769302728704

This is of course a R news outlet but then again with these things we tend to hear local news from Russia first. Cause Trump is a Russian and all that.

Thoughts? Gonna be good right? 🙂.

Of course this means that Trump was on the phone with Putin last night, again.
 
Last edited:
pcgeek11 said:
Maddow Blog?

OMG.
Click to expand...

I know right? The direct opposite of ie. Hannity.
Maddow = verifiable facts
Hannity = disinformation and lies.

You could source check her your self you know .. Of course we all know how the Taliban feel about a womans role in society, so it makes perfect conservative sense to just belittle her for being born female .. and gay.
Good job sport.
 
pcgeek11 said:
Maddow Blog?

OMG.
Click to expand...


Here you go, since it appears you won't do any damned looking at the source of Maddow's blog. This is the actual Reuter's report that you are being rather dismissive about since it's obvious viewing anything from some woman's blog is repugnant to you, given your comment quoted above.

Russia says it is starting to resume U.S. cyber cooperation: TASS

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia and the United States are gradually starting to resume cooperation on cyber security, TASS news agency cited the head of Russia’s FSB Federal Security Service as saying on Thursday.

Russia’s bilateral relations with the United States are at post-Cold War lows, strained by an array of issues including U.S. allegations that Russia meddled in the U.S. 2016 presidential election.

“...we are restoring these (cyber security) relations,” FSB chief Alexander Bortnikov said.
Click to expand...

www.reuters.com

Russia says it is starting to resume U.S. cyber cooperation: TASS

Russia and the United States are gradually starting to resume cooperation on cyber security, TASS news agency cited the head of Russia's FSB Federal Security Service as saying on Thursday.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com

That assuage your mini-meltdown? Make your reading easier since the article isn't being shown, discussed, and linked by some liberal gay female?
 
I mean .. its right there in the top of the tweet "REUTERS" .. yet some people will just see a smart competent gay female journalist and begin to scream in horror. Conservatives, I am talking about conservatives.
 
What’s job number one for this joint task force? Dig up dirt on Democrats? Is Giuliani’s security firm the prime contractor?

I don’t suppose the Trumpistan government will be very forthcoming about this.
 
Kushner will be spearheading this year of course... Time to take down the Bidens and Clintons once and for all... Also a new fraction will be announced : StalinJugend a collective of the young and brightest to inform on their friends and parents should the oppose the Trump The First & Putin The Eternal alliance.
Time to weed out the weak.
 
s0me0nesmind1 said:
R news outlet? Da fuq?

Is there a crappy joke I'm not seeing or are you seriously suggesting that Reuters is a right-leaning news outlet?
Click to expand...
Almost, dont give up you almost have it 🙂.
R for Russian : Tass
Also R for Republican cause for now the shoe fits.
So your spidey sense picked up sarcasm it was just the wrong joke.
 
cytg111 said:
I know right? The direct opposite of ie. Hannity.
Maddow = verifiable facts
Hannity = disinformation and lies.

You could source check her your self you know .. Of course we all know how the Taliban feel about a womans role in society, so it makes perfect conservative sense to just belittle her for being born female .. and gay.
Good job sport.
Click to expand...


I never have brought up Hannity either...

She is a loon regardless of her sex, or preferences...
 
Meghan54 said:
Here you go, since it appears you won't do any damned looking at the source of Maddow's blog. This is the actual Reuter's report that you are being rather dismissive about since it's obvious viewing anything from some woman's blog is repugnant to you, given your comment quoted above.


That assuage your mini-meltdown? Make your reading easier since the article isn't being shown, discussed, and linked by some liberal gay female?
Click to expand...

It has nothing to do with a female. I find it funny when anyone quotes a blog, anybodies blog. A blog should be dismissed as a source for anything. He should have just quoted the actual article as you did.

Mini-meltdown?
Where did that happen?
 
pcgeek11 said:
It has nothing to do with a female. I find it funny when anyone quotes a blog, anybodies blog. A blog should be dismissed as a source for anything. He should have just quoted the actual article as you did.

Mini-meltdown?
Where did that happen?
Click to expand...
So you dismiss blogs? It's not 2001. Blogs are legitimate ways to communicate information. Lots of corporations maintains blogs written by experts in their fields. They are typically devoid of corporate BS and marketing. Pick you favorite product, technology, or hobby and go look at the blogs. They aren't all written by lay people with some interest in the topics.

So yeah, Maddow has proven her aptitude for reporting facts and analyzing them on tv. She also chooses to use a blog to share information outside of the constraints of a tv show as well.
 
compcons said:
So you dismiss blogs? It's not 2001. Blogs are legitimate ways to communicate information. Lots of corporations maintains blogs written by experts in their fields. They are typically devoid of corporate BS and marketing. Pick you favorite product, technology, or hobby and go look at the blogs. They aren't all written by lay people with some interest in the topics.

So yeah, Maddow has proven her aptitude for reporting facts and analyzing them on tv. She also chooses to use a blog to share information outside of the constraints of a tv show as well.
Click to expand...


There are also a lot of lunatics writing blogs that are in no way associated with the truth.

I have a different opinion of Maddow's reporting.
 
pcgeek11 said:
I never have brought up Hannity either...

She is a loon regardless of her sex, or preferences...
Click to expand...

And if she was a member here I assume you would get an infraction for a baseless personal attack.

pcgeek11 said:
It has nothing to do with a female. I find it funny when anyone quotes a blog, anybodies blog. A blog should be dismissed as a source for anything. He should have just quoted the actual article as you did.

Mini-meltdown?
Where did that happen?
Click to expand...
I know what standard we are operating at here but still this is disappointing... you said "Maddow blog bleh" not "Some blog bleh". Who are you trying to fool? Its not us.. So maybe its yourself, who knows.
It is also a well documented fact that Trump Loyalists have been indoctrinated to hate a great number of truth tellers, among those Maddows reporting, show, blog, books or otherwise. So dont worry, it comes as a surprise to no-one. We get it.
 
Last edited:
cytg111 said:
And if she was a member here I assume you would get an infraction for a baseless personal attack.


I know what standard we are operating at here but still this is disappointing... you said "Maddow blog bleh" not "Some blog bleh". Who are you trying to fool? Its not us.. So maybe its yourself, who knows.
It is also a well documented fact that Trump Loyalists have been indoctrinated to hate a great number of truth tellers, among those Maddows reporting, show, blog, books or otherwise. So dont worry, it comes as a surprise to no-one. We get it.
Click to expand...

If she were a member here.... LOL. Well I guess I'm lucky that she isn't a member.

I'm not trying to fool anyone. I say what I think. Sorry it doesn't meet with Your Standards.

Enjoy the Blogs. 😛
 
pcgeek11 said:
I've watched her show a few times. It is my opinion based on watching her show.
Click to expand...

didn't answer the question. why is she a loon? basically--what do you consider a loon?

again, you can't defend a stupid statement that has no basis in the same facts that we all understand, simply by calling a stupid statement "an opinion."

It's like: "Yes, I admit that I am passing off a lie and/or a completely stupid thing as a system of belief, but it's OK and equally valid because I will now call it an opinion."

It isn't a blanket defense for disregarding accepted, unassailable truths.

I'm not sure why you dismiss her journalism when she has been shown to have an extremely high degree of accuracy and honesty. Why would you dismiss such a high standard? It must be some other reason,because so far your arguments aren't really based on the content, but the individual.

That's why I'm curious about what you call "a loon."
 
pcgeek11 said:
If she were a member here.... LOL. Well I guess I'm lucky that she isn't a member.

I'm not trying to fool anyone. I say what I think. Sorry it doesn't meet with Your Standards.

Enjoy the Blogs. 😛
Click to expand...

Yes, we know you "say what you think."

The question is why you think anything you say is of equal validity to what someone else says, simply because you say it, when to this point your MO is that you simply don't care about evidence or facts in support of the things you say, when responding in kind to those that bring evidence to the table for discussion, when forming their arguments.

It doesn't work that way, and I'm not sure if you still don't understand that.

You routinely dismiss others when they form arguments and opinions based on solid evidence and reason, by simply stating "I disagree," with never an argument couched in evidence or logic, as to why you disagree. You only ever argue against evidence-based argument by claiming that your belief-based opinions are equal in measure...seemingly because you think that the mere "holding of an opinion" is validation in itself of that opinion.

This isn't how adults talk about real issues.
 
zinfamous said:
didn't answer the question. why is she a loon? basically--what do you consider a loon?

again, you can't defend a stupid statement that has no basis in the same facts that we all understand, simply by calling a stupid statement "an opinion."

It's like: "Yes, I admit that I am passing off a lie and/or a completely stupid thing as a system of belief, but it's OK and equally valid because I will now call it an opinion."

It isn't a blanket defense for disregarding accepted, unassailable truths.

I'm not sure why you dismiss her journalism when she has been shown to have an extremely high degree of accuracy and honesty. Why would you dismiss such a high standard? It must be some other reason,because so far your arguments aren't really based on the content, but the individual.

That's why I'm curious about what you call "a loon."
Click to expand...


Because Maddow is just the other side of the same coin as Hannity.

Simple as that.
 
zinfamous said:
This isn't how adults talk about real issues.
Click to expand...

I guess you think I should foam at the mouth, call posters with different opinions names and berate them as many were known to do quite often before the rule changes.

Is that how adults talk about real issues?
I could gather a few quotes, but I won't. We all know the truth.
 
pcgeek11 said:
Because Maddow is just the other side of the same coin as Hannity.

Simple as that.
Click to expand...
Difference:
Hannity : Emotion
Maddow : Logic
You know I dont like more much of Maddows format either, but going by experience, verifiable facts and predictions that has come to pass..... Shit, catch the highlights from her show online for a week and tell me if the shit she is talking about isnt real. I dare you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top