Originally posted by: Whitedog
None of the new P4's are being made with 256k cache are they? (I know, celery, but that doesn't count here) I don't think so... SO WHY THE FARFINUGLE is AMD still putting 256k cache in them? The Dolts! WHy don't they just call the 256k chips Durons.
They've already came out with the 512k chips, so they need to just abandon the idea the 256k L2 is acceptable!
DOWN WITH 256k!!!!!
![]()
P4's have 64kb L1 + 512kb L2 = 576kb
Athlons have 128kb + 256kb = 384kb
Barton 128kb + 512kb = 640kb
And the extra 256kb on the Barton doesn't do all that much (as results have shown) so why bother putting 512kb on when they're gonna be moving on to totally new processors soon.
For Intel is was worthwhile, but now, for AMD, the same isn't quite so true.
