AMD's new core for sale

[the Chase]

Maybe Newegg has them mislabeled- I thought they were supposed to be 65nm chips? (which would be really early) 1.2-1.25 volts only....HHHmmmm. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819103741

Edit- Blah, these are just the 65W versions of Windsor that AMD has been hyping for awhile now.....

 

[knightc2]

Do these OC well? The voltage sure is low. I have heard little about these.

 

[the Chase]

Not sure. You would think they would hiiting stock clocks on the lower volts, but who knows. Kinda pricey.

 

[Pabster]

Keep Dreaming

 

[sjwaste]

I dunno, you can undervolt a lot of the current ones pretty well too. I run my Opteron 165 at 2.2 GHz (it can go higher, but HTT 250 gives me an exact divider to run the memory at 200 so I don't push it harder unless I'm just experimenting) and have decreased the voltage to 1.5v, CnQ disabled, with no adverse effects on stability. Temps dropped a bit too.

 

[JAG87]

Definetely not the 65nm part.

AMD barely got their 65nm chips working, they still dont know what the stock voltage is going to be. They were thinking 1.25 but they may end up going as high as 1.4 to get decent clocks out of it. They had stability problems with 1.25

There is no way these things are even produced yet. Thats a labelling error from the egg.

 

[Viditor]

Originally posted by: JAG87
Definetely not the 65nm part.

AMD barely got their 65nm chips working, they still dont know what the stock voltage is going to be. They were thinking 1.25 but they may end up going as high as 1.4 to get decent clocks out of it. They had stability problems with 1.25

There is no way these things are even produced yet. Thats a labelling error from the egg.

Ummm...that was a bogus rumour that was shown to be an early bios problem.

 

[SparkyJJO]

well the egg says brisbane core and 90nm so if brisbane is supposed to be 65nm one of those that newegg wrote down is incorrect

 

[sandorski]

Could it be one of the new reduced power consumption chips? You know, the 38watt X2 chips.

 

[the Chase]

Someone call Newegg up and see if it's really Brisbane or not.....

 

[JAG87]

Originally posted by: Viditor

Originally posted by: JAG87
Definetely not the 65nm part.

AMD barely got their 65nm chips working, they still dont know what the stock voltage is going to be. They were thinking 1.25 but they may end up going as high as 1.4 to get decent clocks out of it. They had stability problems with 1.25

There is no way these things are even produced yet. Thats a labelling error from the egg.

Ummm...that was a bogus rumour that was shown to be an early bios problem.

really, i didnt know that, thanks for the update.

 

[coldpower27]

Newegg is very notorious for getting CPU core names wrong.

 

[Brunnis]

The link says ADO4200CUBOX. Type that in on http://www.amdcompare.com and it shows up as the 65W Energy Efficient 4200+ and it also says that it's manufactured on 90nm SOI.

So, this is not a 65nm part.

 

[CupCak3]

i was hoping they'd have the 3800 version of this

 

[the Chase]

I think they will very soon.

 

[knightc2]

OK. After some research this loooks like this is the energy efficient Windsor core. Wonder how well this will OC.
Anyone know if any of these will be released for 939?