• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

amd's 8450 tested

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's 8350 and the "tester" is a Chinese guy who had 3.3Ghz ES and OCed it to "simulate" real FX8350... So even though the end results may be similar to what is shown in the "test", I wouldn't pay much attention to the blog above.

AMD themselves said that PD FX will be 10-15% faster than previous FX so I don't know what the heck that guy is rambling about. PD was never about IPC improvements,it was about power and clock improvements with ironing out some of the quirks in the design.

PS The "blogger" says it's a piece of crap that will sell for 200$ USD while 1 sentence before that he says it competes good with 2600K which is arguably the best desktop CPU on the market now(considering price/perf./OC/power draw). 2600K is MUCH more pricier than projected price for FX8350.
 
Last edited:
inf64 said:
PS The "blogger" says it's a piece of crap that will sell for 200$ USD while 1 sentence before that he says it competes good with 2600K
Click to expand...

Clearly competing in one area is not competing at all so saying it's a piece of crap is definitely the case. U can polish a turd all you want, it's still a turd.
 
ORB.... no thanks.

Rather see if anything showed up on Chiphell or the like, not really too trusting of ORB.
He's been wrong to often, or claimed things that where wrong, or lied/made things up.
That happends when your getting page hits off of rumors, and the more juicy the better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top