Originally posted by: Twsmit
Originally posted by: YoshiSato
Originally posted by: Looney
I think this strengthens the rumor of AMD interest in buying ATI.
Why would they buy ATI when they are in bed with Nvidia? ATI doesn't even have a chip set, Nividia does.
If this CPU socketed GPUs and PPUs takes off well, could this make PCIe obsolete?
While your literally wrong.... you have a point, ATI's chipets are somewhat behind nvidia, and for the last 2+ years nvidia has owned the AMD chipset market, and still does pretty much.
Hmm... wrongness enjoys company. As far as I know most ATI chipsets perform equivalently and/or better than their NVIDIA counterparts. In fact, there are several reviews showing that for enthusiasts, the ATI parts overclock far better than NVIDIA's.
Of course ATI has their own issues, such as poor southbridges, lack of SLI support (yes, I know, they have CrossFire, but they don't have SLI), and a few other defficiencies.
Only reason NVIDIA owns the (AMD chipset) market is because they've been in it longer.