AMD Ryzen (Summit Ridge) Benchmarks Thread (use new thread)

Page 68 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

bjt2

Senior member
Sep 11, 2016
784
180
86
I've seen that slope before.

wTAIFyJ.png


Either the system hits the thermal limit (skin temperature) at 100s mark, or HP has reduced the stock duration (200s) in half.
Obviously the first option isn't too likely, since the time is exactly half :rolleyes:

It's a full notebook... It does not have skin temperature (cit.)...
 

coercitiv

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2014
7,356
17,426
136
This thread has gotten kind of long, are there any verified benchmarks yet or is it still all theoretical.
No verified benches except the AMD demo, and that is of very limited help, since it only exposes the strong points of the new arch, in a controlled software environment, with no info on max clocks / power usage.
 

nismotigerwvu

Golden Member
May 13, 2004
1,568
33
91
Additionally, even if leaks are valid they are running on engineering samples that may or may not have performance relevant bugs. As nice as it would be to have early previews like we saw with Conroe, we're not going to have anything solid until at or EXTREMELY near launch.
 
Mar 10, 2006
11,715
2,012
126
https://www.computerbase.de/2016-11/amd-zen-sr7-sr5-sr3/


3, 5, 7 sounds familiar for a CPU naming scheme, AMD seems to copy Intel once again. If the price is roughly accurate, then it is clear AMD doesn't want to compete with Intels E-lineup. And it doesn't bode well for its performance. >RMB 1500 is just >EUR 200.

RMB 1500 is ~$218. So the lowest-end Summit Ridge SKU will be going up against a 4C/4T Intel processor.

Per core performance really can't be that good if they are trying to fight four non-hyperthreaded cores with eight physical cores (perhaps the lower AMD SKUs won't have SMT).
 

Sweepr

Diamond Member
May 12, 2006
5,148
1,143
136
So from what I gather from the Chiphell thread:

- SR3 and SR5 will be around 1500 RMB
- SR7 above 1500 RMB
- There's 140W TDP SR7
- SR7 launches first, then SR5, then SR3

https://www.chiphell.com/thread-1670005-1-1.html

If that's true they are positioning two SKUs against Kaby Lake-S Core i5. We are talking about 4C/8T or 8C/8T Summit Ridge going up against 4C/4T Kaby Lake. Probably not as close to Intel performance per core as some here expect. If these parts convincingly beat Core i7-7700K they would probably be priced higher.
 

Dresdenboy

Golden Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,730
554
136
citavia.blog.de
Nah, I don't expect any cores within a CCX to be disabled.

I could see 4C/8T, 8C/8T, and 8C/16T parts.
That's my assumption, too.

It seems, ES boost clocks >3.5GHz look better than before. These might be all core or max boost clocks, depending on what "8 core Zen turbo frequency" means).
AMD现在给到的参考,8核Zen的Turbo频率是3.5GHz以上的。
默认上4GHz估计不太可能,但AMD为8核准备了高达140W TDP的散热器,预留空间很大,所以一切皆有可能。
 

AtenRa

Lifer
Feb 2, 2009
14,003
3,362
136
This would fall right in place for $200+, $300+, $400+ tiers, covering i5, 4C i7, 6C i7 and maybe something higher with some binned headline grabbers.

8C 8T at $300 with Ivy-Haswell IPC and more than 4GHz OC capability will certainly stir the x86 Desktop waters.

Lets see.............
 

KTE

Senior member
May 26, 2016
478
130
76
FWIW I'm hearing good news but... I'm not sure how much to say because the person is biased.

From what I'm hearing this is well worth the wait. Unlike anything since AMD 2005.

I'll catchup on posts later at the weekend.

Sent from HTC 10
(Opinions are own)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dresdenboy
Mar 10, 2006
11,715
2,012
126
You should check your hearing then because it doesnt sound like this in any way, it was just a remark from your own and coercitiv's post ;)

I didn't say Haswell IPC nor 4GHz overclock capability. Those are sprinkles of magic that you added to the discussion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.