AMD Ryzen (Summit Ridge) Benchmarks Thread (use new thread)

Page 231 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
The Hype is real...

https://twitter.com/VideoCardz/status/832583990284517381

5GHz faces??

C43uh18WEAEROnq.jpg
 

Doom2pro

Senior member
Apr 2, 2016
587
619
106
It could be a PRO 1600 assuming the frequencies are accurate for the OPNs, 1500 is supposedly 3.4/3.2 and 1600x is correct frequency 3.7/3.3 but the TDP is too high at 95W, so that leaves the PRO 1600 in the middle but we don't have clocks for that, or any PRO model for that matter, so I don't think it's too far of a stretch to assume the PRO (Business) models have the same base/boost as their X counterparts albeit just without XFR enabled and possibly not over clockable allowing it to fall into the 65W TDP bracket.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drazick

bjt2

Senior member
Sep 11, 2016
784
180
86
I've heard otherwise, but I'm not sure if it is depending on the region.

Anyway, the alledged leaks we've seen so far are not done on review parts.

It seems that chinese firm has it. No ES code: http://imgur.com/a/yM9l4

R5 1400X (4c/8t 65W) rated 4GHz by windows. Included a screen with lightly loaded CPU and mean clock of 4.52GHz (XFR in action i presume)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Face2Face

OrangeKhrush

Senior member
Feb 11, 2017
220
343
96
In the first Independance Day movie, there is a part where Dr Okin says to them "ever since they showed up, the last few weeks have been really exciting" Thats how I feel on it. It has been a mad rush of beyond my wildest dreams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crumpet

lolfail9001

Golden Member
Sep 9, 2016
1,056
353
96
it is fake, see l1 and l2 caches
4x64 (Zen has 32 d/i each, right?) = 256 L1
4x256 = 1MB L2
1 CCX = 8 MB L3

It is better of fake than you think it is.

EDIT: Never mind, i forgot that it is 512kb L2. Yep, fake.
 
Last edited:

looncraz

Senior member
Sep 12, 2011
722
1,651
136
Then OEMs and component makers are screwed because they couldn't validate with production silicon.

Wouldn't be a problem if AMD simply internally gimped memory performance... Would be pretty easy to do, but they still wouldn't be able to hide their full performance.
 

CentroX

Senior member
Apr 3, 2016
351
152
116
kcfqPPI.png


I guess I need to buy the 1800X to feel the upgrade. I hate the X79 chip so no loss upgrading anyway.
 
Last edited:

Justinbaileyman

Golden Member
Aug 17, 2013
1,980
249
106
Could some one with a 6700k or 7700k run the cpuz bench and post a picture of it please so I can see where it stands vs. what has been posted? Pretty pretty please?? Thanks!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.